Views of diagnosis distribution in primary care in 2.5 million encounters in Stockholm: A comparison between ICD-10 and SNOMED CT

Informatics in Primary Care

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 17-29

  Vikström, Anna ^a   Nyström, Mikael ^c   Ahlfeldt, Hans ^b   Strender, Lars Erik ^c   Nilsson, Gunnar H ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Classification; Diagnosis; ICD 10; Medical records systems computerised; Primary care; SNOMED CT

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; SWEDEN; SYSTEMATIZED NOMENCLATURE OF MEDICINE;

DIAGNOSIS; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; STATE MEDICINE; SWEDEN; SYSTEMATIZED NOMENCLATURE OF MEDICINE;

EID: 77951779694     PISSN: 14760320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v18i1.750     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Nilsson GH, Strender LE, Mansson J, Ahlfeldt H and Gunnarsson G. Patients general practitioners diseases and health problems in urban general practice: a cross-sectional study on electronic patient records. Primary Health Care Research and Development 2008;9:119-125
2. Njalsson T, Sigurdsson JA and McAuley RG. Health problems in family practice: an Icelandic multicentre study. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 1996;14:4-12.
3. Grimsmo A, Hagman E, Falko E, Matthiessen L and Njalsson T. Patients diagnoses and processes in general practice in the Nordic countries. An attempt to make data from computerised medical records available for comparable statistics. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 2001;19:76-82.
4. Schers H, Bor H, van den Hoogen H and van Weel C. What went and what came? Morbidity trends in general practice from the Netherlands. European Journal of General Practice 2008;14:1,13-24.
5. Surjan G. Questions on validity of International Classification of Diseases-coded Diagnoses. International Journal of Medical Informatics 1999;54:77-95.
6. O'Malley JK, Cook FK, Price DM, Wildes R, Hurdle FJ and Ashton MC. Measuring Diagnoses: ICD code accuracy. 634 HSR: Health Services Research 40:5 Part II (October 2005).
7. Stausberg J, Lehmann N, Kaczmarek D and Stein M. Reliability of diagnoses coding with ICD-10. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2008;77:50-57
8. Hoddevik GH. Diagnose versus kode. Tidsskrift for Den norste lœgeforening 2005;125:2973-2974
9. Nilsson G, Ahlfeldt H and Strender LE. Textual content health problems and diagnostic codes in electronic patient records in general practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 2003;21:33-36
10. Henderson T, Shepheard J and Sundararajan V. Quality of diagnosis and procedure coding in ICD-10 administrative data. Medical Care 2006;44:1011-1019
11. Jakobsen KD, Frederiksen JN, Hansen T, Jansson LB, Parnas J and Werge T. Reliability of clinical ICD-10 schizophrenia diagnoses. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 2005;59:209-212
12. International Classification of Diseases (ICD). www.who.int/ classifications/icd/en/index.html
13. Klassifikation av sjukdomar och hälsoproblem 1997 - Primärvård. KSH97-P. Socialstyrelsen. www.socialstyrelsen.se/Lists/ Artikelkatalog/Attachments/12706/1997-4-1199741.pdf
14. Inpatient Diseases in Sweden 1987-2007. Socialstyrelsen. www.socialstyrelsen.se/Lists/Artikelkatalog/Attachments/8714/ 2008-125-15-200812515-rev.pdf
15. Héja G, Varga P and Surjan G. Design principles of DOLCE-based formal representation of ICD10. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2008;136:821-826
16. de Lusignan S and van Weel C. The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges. Family Practice 2006;23: 253-263
17. Rossi Mori A, Consorti F and Galeazzi E. Standards to support development of terminological systems for healthcare telematics. Methods of Information in Medicine 1998;37:551-563
18. Gersenovic M. The ICD Family of Classifications. Methods of Information in Medicine 1995;34:172-175
19. SNOMED CT. International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation (IHTSDO). www.ihtsdo.org
20. Nationellt fackspråk för vård och omsorg.www. socialstyrelsen.se/halsoinformatik/nationelltfacksprak
21. SNOMED Clinical Terms® Technical Reference Guide. IHTSDO July 2008. www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct/snomed-ct-publications/
22. SNOMED Clinical Terms® User Guide. IHTSDO July 2008. www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct/snomed-ct-publications/
23. Bowman S. Coordinating SNOMED-CT and ICD-10: getting the most out ofelectronic health record systems. Journal of the American Health Information Management Association 2005;76:60-61
24. Foley MM and Garrett SG. Code ahead: key issues shaping clinical terminology and classification. Journal of the American Health Information Management Association 2006;77:24-30.
25. Vikström A, Skåntir Y, Strender LE and Nilsson GH. Mapping the categories of the Swedish primary health care version of ICD-10 to SNOMED CT concepts: rule development and intercoder reliability in a mapping trial. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2007;7:9.
26. Nyström M, Vikström A, Nilsson GH, Åhlfeldt H and Örman H. Enriching a Primary Health Care Version of ICD-10 using SNOMED CT Mapping. Unpublished material.
27. General Practice - Practice Team Information Scotland 2006/074. Top Ten Conditions, Ranked by Annual Contact Rate by GPs. www.isdscotland.org/isd/3687. html
28. Cimino JJ. Desiderata for controlled medical vocabularies in the twenty-first century. Methods of Information in Medicine 1998;37:394-403.
29. Rector A. Terminology codes and classifications in perspective: the challenge of re-use. British Journal of Health Care and Information Management 2000;17: 20-23
30. Assaf AR, Lapane KL, McKenney JL and Carleton RA. Possible influence of the prospective payment system on the assignment of discharge diagnoses for coronary heart disease. New England Journal of Medicine 1993;329: 931-935
31. Wang Y, Patrick J, Miller G and O'Hallaran J. A computational linguistics motivated mapping of ICPC-2 PLUS to SNOMED CT. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2008;8(Suppl 1):S5.