Numerical investigation of the effect of hypertensive blood pressure on cerebral aneurysm - Dependence of the effect on the aneurysm shape

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 54, Issue 6-8, 2007, Pages 995-1009

  Torii, Ryo ^a   Oshima, Made ^b   Kobayashi, Toshio ^c   Takagi, Kiyoshi ^d   Tezduyar, Tayfun E ^e  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE   (Japan)

^c JAPAN AUTOMOBILE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^d Ogura Hospital   (Japan)

^e Rice University   (United States)

Author keywords

Aneurysm shape; Cardiovascular modelling; Fluid structure interaction; Hypertension; Patient specific computation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLOW PATTERNS; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION; HEMODYNAMICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

ANEURYSM SHAPE; CARDIOVASCULAR MODELLING; CEREBRAL ANEURYSM; HYPERTENSIVE BLOOD PRESSURE; PATIENT-SPECIFIC COMPUTATION;

BLOOD PRESSURE;

BLOOD PRESSURE; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLOW PATTERNS; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION; HEMODYNAMICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 34347355219     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1497     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. van Gijn J, Rinkel GJE. Subarachnoid hemorrhage: diagnosis, cause and management. Brain 2001; 124:249-278.
2. Steiger HJ. Pathophysiology of development and rupture of cerebral aneurysms. Acta Neurochirurgica Suppliment 1990; 48:1-57.
3. Lehoux S, Tronc F, Tedgui A. Mechanisms of blood flow-induced vascular enlargement. Biorheology 2002; 39:319-324.
4. Ujiie H, Tachibana H, Hiramatsu O, Hazel A, Matsumoto T, Ogasawara Y, Nakajima H, Hori T, Takakura K, Kajiya F. Effects of size and shape (aspect ratio) on the hemodynamics of saccular aneurysms: a possible index for surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1999; 45:119-130.
5. Russel SM, Lin K, Hahn SA, Jafar JJ. Smaller cerebral aneurysms producing more extensive subarachnoid hemorrhage following rupture: a radiological investigation and discussion of theoretical determinants. Journal of Neurosurgery 2003; 99:248-253.
6. Tateshima S, Murayama Y, Villablanca JP, Morino T, Takahashi H, Yamauchi T, Tanishita K, Vinuela F. Intraaneurysmal flow dynamics study featuring an acrylic aneurysm model manufactured using a computerized tomography angiogram as a mold. Journal of Neurosurgery 2001; 95:1020-1027.
7. Burleson AC, Strother CM, Turitto VT. Computer modeling of intracranial saccular and lateral aneurysms for the study of their hemodynamics. Neurosurgery 1995; 37:774-783.
8. Foutrakis GN, Yonas H, Sclabassi RJ. Saccular aneurysm formation in curved and bifurcating arteries. American Journal of Neuroradiology 1999; 20:1309-1317.
9. Shojima M, Oshima M, Takagi K, Torii R, Hayakawa M, Katada K, Morita M, Kirino T. Magnitude and role of wall shear stress on cerebral aneurysm: computational fluid dynamic study of 20 middle cerebral artery aneurysms Stroke 2004; 35:2500-2505.
10. Cebral JR, Castro MA, Burgess JE, Pergolizzi RS, Sheridan MJ, Putman CM. Characterization of cerebral aneurysms for assessing risk of rapture by using patient-specific computational hemodynamics models. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2005; 26:2550-2559.
11. Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE. Fluid-structure interaction modeling of aneurysmal conditions with high and normal blood pressures. Computational Mechanics 2006; 38:482-490.
12. Zakaria H, Yonas H, Robertson AM. Analysis of the importance of the ratio of aneurysm size to parent artery diameter on hemodynamic condition. Journal of Biomechanics 2006; 39:S272.
13. Taylor CA, Draney MT, Ku JP, Parker D, Steele BN, Wang K, Zarins CK. Predictive medicine: computational techniques in therapeutic decision-making. Computer Aided Surgery 1999; 4:231-247.
14. Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE. Computer modeling of cardiovascular fluid-structure interactions with the deforming-spatial-domain/stabilized space-time formulation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195:1885-1895.
15. Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Zhang Y, Hughes TJR. Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction analysis with applications to arterial blood flow. Computational Mechanics 2006; 38:310-322.
16. Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE. Influence of wall elasticity in patient-specific hemodynamic simulations. Computers and Fluids 2007; 36:160-168.
17. Tada S, Tarbel JM. Oxygen mass transport in a compliant carotid bifurcation model. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2006; 34. Available online.
18. Tezduyar TE. Stabilized finite element formulations for incompressible flow computations. Advances in Applied Mechanics 1992; 28:1-44.
19. Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Liou J. A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces - the deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure: I. The concept and the preliminary numerical tests. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1992; 94:339-351.
20. Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Mittal S, Liou J. A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces - the deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure: II. Computation of free-surface flows, two-liquid flows, and flows with drifting cylinders. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1992; 94:353-371.
21. Mittal S, Tezduyar TE. Parallel finite element simulation of 3D incompressible flows - fluid-structure interactions. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1995; 21:933-953.
22. Kalro V, Tezduyar TE. A parallel 3D computational method for fluid-structure interactions in parachute systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2000; 190:321-332.
23. Tezduyar T, Osawa Y. Fluid-structure interactions of a parachute crossing the far wake of an aircraft. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2001; 191:717-726.
24. Stein KR, Benney RJ, Tezduyar TE, Leonard JW, Accorsi ML. Fluid-structure interactions of a round parachute: modeling and simulation techniques. Journal of Aircraft 2001; 38:800-808.
25. Tezduyar TE. Computation of moving boundaries and interfaces and stabilization parameters. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2003; 43:555-575.
26. Michler C, van Brummelen EH, Hulshoff SJ, de Borst R. The relevance of conservation for stability and accuracy of numerical methods for fluid-structure interaction. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2003; 192:4195-4215.
27. van Brummelen EH, de Borst R. On the nonnormality of subiteration for a fluid-structure interaction problem. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2005; 27:599-621.
28. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Keedy R, Stein K. Space-time finite element techniques for computation of fluid-structure interactions. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195:2002-2027.
29. Khurram RA, Masud A. A multiscale/stabilized formulation of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations for moving boundary flows and fluid-structure interaction. Computational Mechanics 2006; 38:403-416.
30. Masud A. Effects of mesh motion on the stability and convergence of ALE based formulations for moving boundary flows. Computational Mechanics 2006; 38:430-439.
31. Kuttler U, Forster C, Wall WA. A solution for the incompressibility dilemma in partitioned fluid-structure interaction with pure Dirichlet fluid domains. Computational Mechanics 2006; 38:417-429.
32. Masud A, Bhanabhagvanwala M, Khurram RA. An adaptive mesh rezoning scheme for moving boundary flows and fluid-structure interaction. Computers and Fluids 2007; 36:77-91.
33. Sawada T, Hisada T. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of the two dimensional flag-in-wind problem by an interface tracking ALE finite element method. Computers and Fluids 2007; 36:136-146.
34. Wall WA, Genkinger S, Ramm E. A strong coupling partitioned approach for fluid-structure interaction with free surfaces. Computers and Fluids 2007; 36:169-183.
35. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S. Modeling of fluid-structure interactions with the space-time finite elements: solution techniques. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2007. DOI: 10.1002/fld.1430
36. Taylor CL, Yuan Z, Selman WR, Ratcheson RA, Rimm AA. Cerebral arterial aneurysm formation and rupture in 20,767 elderly patients: hypertension and other risk factors. Journal of Neurosurgery 1995; 83:812-819.
37. Karino T, Takeuchi S, Kobayashi N, Motomiya M, Mabuchi S. Fluid dynamics of cerebrovascular disease (in Japanese). Neurosurgeons 1993; 12:15-24.
38. Hughes TJR, Brooks AN. A multi-dimensional upwind scheme with no crosswind diffusion. In Finite Element Methods for Convection Dominated Flows, Hughes TJR (ed.), AMD, vol. 34. ASME: New York, 1979; 19-35.
39. Brooks AN, Hughes TJR. Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1982; 32:199-259.
40. Tezduyar TE, Mittal S, Ray SE, Shih R. Incompressible flow computations with stabilized bilinear and linear equal-order-interpolation velocity-pressure elements. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1992; 95:221-242.
41. Tezduyar T, Aliabadi S, Behr M, Johnson A, Mittal S. Parallel finite-element computation of 3D flows. Computer 1993; 26:27-36.
42. Tezduyar TE, Aliabadi SK, Behr M, Mittal S. Massively parallel finite element simulation of compressible and incompressible flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1994; 119:157-177.
43. Tezduyar T, Aliabadi S, Behr M, Johnson A, Kalro V, Litke M. Flow simulation and high performance computing. Computational Mechanics 1996; 18:397-412.
44. Tezduyar TE. CFD methods for three-dimensional computation of complex flow problems. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 1999; 81:97-116.
45. Tezduyar TE. Finite element methods for flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 2001; 8:83-130.
46. Tezduyar TE. Interface-tracking and interface-capturing techniques for finite element computation of moving boundaries and interfaces. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195:2983-3000.
47. Tezduyar TE. Finite elements in fluids: stabilized formulations and moving boundaries and interfaces. Computers and Fluids 2007; 36:191-206.
48. Tezduyar TE. Finite elements in fluids: special methods and enhanced solution techniques. Computers and Fluids 2007; 36:207-223.
49. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Stein K. Solution techniques for the fully-discretized equations in computation of fluid-structure interactions with the space-time formulations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195:5743-5753.
50. Tezduyar TE. Finite element methods for fluid dynamics with moving boundaries and interfaces. In Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics, Volume 3: Fluids. Chapter 17, Stein E, De Borst R, Hughes TJR (eds). Wiley: New York, 2004.
51. Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Mittal S, Johnson AA. Computation of unsteady incompressible flows with the finite element methods - space-time formulations, iterative strategies and massively parallel implementations. New Methods in Transient Analysis, PVP-vol. 246/ AMD-vol. 143. ASME: New York, 1992; 7-24.
52. Loremson WE, Cline HE. Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. Computer Graphics 1987; 21:163-169.
53. Wells Jr RE, Merrill EW. Shear rate dependence of the viscosity of whole blood and plasma. Science 1961; 133:763-764.
54. Womersley JR. Method for the calculation of velocity, rate of flow and viscos drag in arteries when the pressure gradient is known. Journal of Physiology 1955; 127:553-563.