EA as a tool in change and coherency management - A case of a local government

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Valtonen, Katariina ^a   Korhonen, Ismo ^b   Rekonen, Riku ^b   Leppänen, Mauri ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION RESEARCH; CHANGE MANAGEMENT; ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE; FINLAND; FINNISH; GRID ADAPTATION; IN-SITU; INFORMATION USABILITY; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; OPERATION MODEL; STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES; TARGET STATE;

PLANNING;

EID: 77951762864     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2010.166     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Ala-Mutka, J. Strategiamalli. Talentum, Helsinki. 2008. (Book titled as 'Strategy model' in Finnish).
2. Ala-Mutka, Jukka. 2005. Strategic Management of High Growth Ventures - A Venture-to-Capital Framework for Professional Entrepreneurship, Tampere: Tampere University of Technology. Publication 565 (dissertation).
3. The Association of Finnish Local and Regional Authorities, 2008. "Project to restructure local government." http://www.kunnat.net/k- perussivu.asp?path=1;161;279;280; 60954;58893;105989.
4. Braun C., and R. Winter, A Comprehensive Enterprise Architecture Metamodel and Its Implementation Using a Metamodeling Platform, Workshop in Klagenfurt, GI-Edition Lecture Notes, 2005, 64-79.
5. BSC online learning center, Palladium Group, Inc. 2009. http://www.bscol.com/bsc-online.
6. The Chief Information Officers Council. Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework Version 1.1 Sept. 1999.
7. The CIO Council. US Federal EA Program Management Office. FEA Consolidated Reference Model, Vers. 2.0. 2006.
8. City of Kouvola, 2009. The town by the Kymi river. http://www.kouvola.fi/ inenglish.html. Accessed 12.6.2009.
9. Christiansen, P.E., and J. Gotze, (2006) International Enterprise Architecture Survey - Trends in Governmental Enterprise Architecture on a National Level, http://www.easurvey.org/06-easurveyreport-ver01.pdf
10. P.E. Christiansen, and J. Gotze, "Trends in Governmental Enterprise Architecture: Reviewing National EA Programs - Part 1", Journal of EA 3(1), 2007, pp. 8-18.
11. A. Cordella, "E-government: Towards the e- Bureaucratic Form?", Journal of Information Technology 22(3), 2007, pp. 265-274.
12. G.Doucet, J. Gøtze, P. Saha, S. Bernard, Coherency Management: Using Enterprise Architecture for Alignment, Agility, and Assurance. Journal of EA, May, 2008.
13. Finlex, Law on Local Government Reform9.2.2007/169.
14. P. Harmon, 2004, a BPT book review on Kaplan and Norton. Business Process Trends. 2004.
15. Hay, D.C., A Different Kind of Life Cycle: The Zachman Framework. Essential Strategies, Inc., 2000. URL: http://www.essentialstrategies.com/ publications/methodology/zachman.htm, Accessed:11.6.2009.
16. Hirvonen, A., and M. Pulkkinen, A Practical Approach to EA Planning and Development: the EA Management Grid, BIS'04, Poznan, Poland, 2004, 284-302.
17. Hirvonen, A., M. Pulkkinen, J.J. Ahonen and V. Halttunen, The Gap between Strategies and Implementation - Methodic Support for EA Projects as a Bridge. IBIMA 2003.
18. Hirvonen, A., M. Pulkkinen, and K. Valtonen, Selection Criteria for Enterprise Architecture Methods, ECIME conference 2007, Montpellier, France, 2007.
19. Järvinen, P., On Research Methods, Opinpaja Oy, Tampere, 2003.
20. Kaplan R.S. and Norton D.P. 2004. Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Harvard Business School Press, 2004, 454 pages.
21. Kaplan, Robert S. and David P. Norton. The Balanced Scorecard - Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review. Jan-Feb 1992.
22. Lane, J. New public management. Routledge. 2000.
23. Leist, S., and G. Zellner, Evaluation of Current Architecture Frameworks, SAC'06, Dijon, France, 2006.
24. Leppänen, M., An Ontological Framework and a Methodical Skeleton for Method Engineering, Jyväskylä Studies in Computing 52, University Dissertation, 2005.
25. Ministry of Finance, Government Policy Decision on the Development of IT Management in State Administration, Public Management Department Publications 3c/2006.
26. Ministry of Finance, The GEA Method, User manual 1.0, 29.6.2007, in Finnish.
27. OpenGroup, The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) Version 8.1 "Enterprise Edition".
28. Peristeras, V. and Tarabanis, K. (2004) Governance enterprise architecture (GEA): domain models for e-governance, ICEC'2004. Ed.: Marijn Janssen, Henk G. Sol, and Rene W. Wagenaar. pp. 471-479.
29. Pulkkinen, M., Enterprise Architecture as a Collaboration tool: Discursive Process for Enterprise Architecture Management, Planning and Development, Jyväskylä studies in Computing 93, University of Jyväskylä, Dissertation, 2008.
30. th HICSS 2005.
31. th HICSS 2006.
32. C. Riege and S. Aier, A Contingency Approach to Enterprise Architecture Method Engineering. In ICSOC 2008, LNCS 5472, pp. 388-399. Springer-Verlag 2009.
33. Riel, M. (2007) Understanding Action Research, Center for Collaborative Action Research. Pepperdine University. Accessed online on [15.6.2009] from http://cadres.pepperdine.edu/ccar/define.html
34. Reason & Bradbury, Handbook of Action Research. London: Sage, 2001.
35. Rood, M., Enterprise Architecture: Definition, Content, and Utility. IEEE 3rd Workshop on Enabling Technologies. Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, IEEE 1994, pp. 106-111.
36. Ross J., Weill P., Robertson D., Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Harvard School Business Process. 2006.
37. Schekkerman., J., How to Survive in the Jungle of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks. Creating or Choosing an Enterprise Architecture Framework. Trafford, 2003.
38. J.F. Sowa and J. Zachman (1992). Extending and Formalizing the Framework for Information Systems Architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 31(3), 1992. p.590-616.
39. S. Spewak and S.C. Hill. Enterprise Architecture Planning: Developing a Blueprint for Data, Applications, and Technology. John Wiley & Sons, New York City. 1995.
40. Tarabanis, K., Peristeras, V., Fragidis, G. 2001. Building an Enterprise Architecture for Public Administration: A High-level Data Model for Strategic Planning. ECIS: "Global Co-Operation in the New Millennium". June 27-29 2001. Bled, Slovenia.
41. Treasury Board of Canada, 2004. Business Transformation Enablement Program. Accessed Oct.30, 2009, from http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/btep-pto/index-e. asp.
42. US Department of the Treasury Chief Information Officer Council (2000). Treasury Enterprise Architecture Framework. Version 1, July 2000. Accessed 13.6.2009. http://www.eaframeworks.com/TEAF/teaf.doc
43. Valtonen, K., and M. Leppänen, Business Architecture Development at Public Administration - Insights from Government EA Method Engineering Project in Finland. ISD'08 Conference, Pafos, Cyprus 2008.
44. Valtonen, K., and V. Seppänen, Adaptation and Adoption of Finnish Government EA Method, Public Management Department Publications 4/2008, Ministry of Finance, 29.1.2008. In Finnish, English summary.
45. Valtonen, K., Seppänen V., Leppänen M. Government Enterprise Architecture grid adaptation in Finland. HICSS'42 in January 5-8th 2009, Hawaii, USA.
46. Ward J. and Peppard J. 2002. Strategic Planning for Information Systems. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
47. J.A. Zachman, A Framework for Information Systems Architecture, IBM Systems Journal 26(3), 1987, pp. 276-292.