Selection criteria for enterprise architecture methods

ECIME 2007: European Conference on Information Management and Evaluation

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 227-236

  Hirvonen, Ari ^a   Pulkkinen, Mirja ^b   Valtonen, Katariina ^b  

^a TietoEnator GMR Ltd   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

E Government; Enterprise architecture; Evaluation; Method; Method selection

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH; TOOLS;

E-GOVERNMENT; ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE; EVALUATION; METHOD; METHOD SELECTION;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84877096176     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Agilense Inc. Woodbridge Virginia. (2007) "Agilense Enterprise Architecture Frameworks." from http://www.agilense.com/documents/agilense_frameworks.doc. Accessed 7.5.2007.
2. Argyris, C., Putman, R. & McLain Smith, D. (1985) Action Science. Concepts, Methods and Skills for Research and Intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
3. Argyris, C., and Schon, D. (1978) Organisational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley.
4. Atkinson C.J. (2000) The 'Soft Information Systems and Technologies Methodology' (SISTeM): an actor network contingency approach to integrated development. In: European Journal of Information Systems (2000) 9, 104-123.
5. Avison, D. and Fitzgerald, G. (2003) Information Systems Development. Methodologies, Techniques and Tools. (3rd ed) McGraw-Hill, London.
6. Aydin Mehmet Nafiz (2006) Decision-Making and Support for Method Adaptation, Dissertation Thesis. CTIT Ph.D.-thesis Series 1381-3617. CTIT 05-87. University of Twente.
7. Gabel, D. (1995) An Introduction to Action Research. National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco. [Accessed 10.2.2004] http://physicsed.buffalostate.edu/danowner/actionrsch.html
8. Baskerville, R. (1999) "Investigating Information Systems with Action Research." Communications of the Association for Information Systems 2.
9. Baskerville, R. L. and Wood-Harper, A. T. (1996) A Critical Perspective on Action Research as a Method for Information Systems Research. Journal of Information Technology 11, 235-246.
10. Bielkowicz, P., Patel, P. and Tun, T. T. (2002) Evaluating Information Systems Development Methods: A New Framework. In Z. Bellahsene, D. Patel & C. Rolland (Eds.) Proc. of the 8th Int. Conf. on Object-Oriented Information Systems (OOIS'2002). LNCS 2425, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 311-322.
11. Blum, B. (1994) "2." Comm. of the ACM 37(11): 82-94.
12. Checkland, P. and J. Scholes (1990) "Soft Systems Methodology In Action."
13. Gemino, A., and Wand, Y., (2004) "A Framework for Empirical Evaluation of Conceptual Modelling Techniques." Requirements Engineering 9: 248-260.
14. Hay, D.C. (2003) Requirements Analysis. From Business Views to Architecture. Prentice Hall.
15. Hirvonen, A., P. (2005) Enterprise Architecture Planning in Practice: Perspectives of Information and Communication Technology Service Provider and End-User. In Jyväskylä Studies in Computing, 48.
16. IDABC (2004) EIF for pan-European eGovernment Services, v. 1.0. [Accessed 12.5.2007] http://europa.eu.int/idabc/en/document/3473/5585.
17. Jayaratna, N., Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies (1994) NIMSAD - A Systemic Framework. New York, McGraw-Hill.
18. Law D. (1988) Methods for Comparing Methods, Techniques in Software Development. NCC Publications, The National Computing Centre Limited, Oxford Road, Manchester M1 7ED, England.
19. Leppänen, M. (2005) An Ontological Framework and a Methodical Skeleton for Method Engineering, Dissertation Thesis. Jyväskylä Studies in Computing 52. Finland, University of Jyväskylä.
20. Moody, D. L. (2003a) The Method Evaluation Model: A Theoretical Model for Validating Information Systems Design Methods. In Ivan et al. (eds): Proceedings of the European Conference of Information Systems.
21. Moody, D. L. (2003b) "Measuring the quality of data models: an empirical evaluation of the use of quality metrics in practice. In Ivan et al. (Eds.) Proceedings of the European Conference of Information Systems."
22. van Offenbeek, M. A. G., Koopman, P. L. (1996) "Scenarios for System Development: Matching Context and Strategy." Behaviour & Information Technology, 15:4, 250-265 15(4): 250-265.
23. Olle, T. W., Hagelstein, J. et al. (1998) Information Systems Methodologies. A Framework for Understanding. New York, International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP)/Addison-Wesley.
24. Rechtin, E. (1992) "The Art of Systems Architecting." IEEE Spectrum (October 1992): 66-69.
25. Sowa, J.F., Zachman, J.A. (1992) Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 590-616.
26. Schekkerman, J., (ed.) (2007) "Enterprise Architecture Tool Selection Guide v 4.0. Institute For Enterprise Architecture Developments." http://www.enterprise-architecture.info/ Accessed 7.5.2007.
27. Schekkerman, J. (2006) How to survive in the jungle of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks. Trafford.
28. ValtITa (2007) Methodology project progress report. Not published project document from Finnish National Enterprise Architecture Development Project.
29. ValtITb (2007) Methodology evaluation report. Not published project document from Finnish National Enterprise Architecture Development Project.
30. Whitman, L., K. Ramachandran, et al. (2001) A Taxonomy of a Living Model of the Enterprise. Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE.
31. Zachman, J.A. (1987) A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 276-292.