Evaluation of current architecture frameworks

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 1546-1553

  Leist, Susanne ^a   Zellner, Gregor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Architecture; Method

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE; ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT;

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 33751044155     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1141277.1141635     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Architecture Board ORMSC, Model Driven Architecture (MDA), Miller, J., Mukerji, J. (Eds.), 2001, http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/apps/doc?ormsc/01-07-01. pdf, (Access: 17. July 2005).
2. Blevins, T.J., Spencer, J., Waskiewicz, F., TOGAF ADM and MDA, 2004, http://www.opengroup.org/cio/MDA-ADM/MDA-TOGAF-R1-070904.pdf. (Access: 17. July 2005).
3. Brancheau, J.C., Building and implementing an information architecture, DATA BASE, Summer (1989), 9-17.
4. Brinkkemper, S., Method Engineering with Web-enabled Methods, in: Brinkkemper, S., Lindencrona, E., Solvberg, A. (Eds.), Information Systems Engineering: State of the Art and Research Themes (Springer, London, 2000), 123-133.
5. Brinkkemper, S., Method Engineering: Engineering of Information Systems Development Methods and Tools, Journal of Information and Software Technology, Vol. 38, Nr. 4 (1996), 275-280.
6. CIO (Chief Information Officer) Council, A Practical Guide to Federal Enterprise Architecture, Version 1.0, (February 2001).
7. Department of the Treasury (CIO (Chief Information Officer) Council), Treasury Enterprise Architecture Framework, Version 1, July 2000, 2000, http://www.eaframeworks.com/TEAF/teaf.doc, (Access: 15. July 2005).
8. DoD Architecture Framework Working Goup, DoD Architecture Framework Version 1.0 - Volume I: Definitions and Guidlines, 2004, http://www.tricare.osd. mil/jmis/download/DoDArchitectureFrameworkVersion1Feb2004.pdf, (Access: 26. August 2005).
9. DoD Architecture Framework Working Goup, DoD Architecture Framework Version 1.0 - Volume II: Product Descriptions, 2004, http://www.defenselink.mil/ nii/doc/DoDAF_ vl_Volume_II.pdf, (Access: 26. August 2005).
10. Enterprise Architecture Community, What is Enterprise Architecture?, 2001, http://network.sharedinsights.com/ea, (Access: 15. July 2005).
11. Ferstl, O.K., Sinz, E.J., SOM Modeling of Business Systems, in: Bernus, P., Mertins, K., Schmidt, G. (Eds.), Handbook of Architecture of Information Systems (Springer, Berlin et al., 1998), 339-358.
12. Frankel, D.S., Harmon, P., Mukerji, J., Odell, J., Owen, M., Rivitt, P., Rosen, M., Soley, R.M., The Zachman Framework and the OMG's Model Driven Architecture, Business Process Trends (2003).
13. Goethals, F., An Overview of Enterprise Architecture Framework Deliverables, 2003, http://www.econ.kuleuven.be/leerstoel/sap/downloads/ Goetbals%20Overview%20existing%20frameworks.pdf, (Access: 20. September 2005).
14. Gutzwiller, T.A., Das CC RIM-Referenzmodell für den Entwurf von betrieblichen, transaktionsorientierteri Informationssystemen (Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1994).
15. Harmsen, F., Saeki, M., Comparison of four method engineering languages, in: Brinkkemper, S., Lyytinen, K., Welke, R.J. (Eds.), Method Engineering, Principles of Method Construction and Tool Support, Proceedings of the IFIP TC8, WG8.1/8.2 Working Conference on Method Engineering (Chapman & Hall, Atlanta, USA, 1996), 209-231.
16. Heym, M., Methoden-Engineering (Rosch-Buchbinderei, Hallstadt, 1993).
17. Hong, S., van den Goor, G., Brinkkemper, S., A Formal Approach to the Comparison of Object-Oriented Analysis and Design Methodologies, in: Proceedings of the 26th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, Vol. Vol. IV (1993), 689-698.
18. IEEE, IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems, 2000, h http://www.idi.ntnu.no/~letizia/swarchi/ IEEE1471.pdf, (Access: 25. June 2003).
19. Kueng, P., Bichler, P., Kawalek, P., Schrefl, M., How to compose an object-oriented business process model?, in: Brinkkemper, S., Lyytinen, K., Welke, R.J. (Eds.), Method Engineering, Principles of Method Construction and Tool Support, Proceedings of the IFIP TC8, WG8.1/8.2 Working Conference on Method Engineering (Chapman & Hall, Atlanta, USA, 1996), 94-110.
20. Marttiin, P., Harmsen, F., Rossi, M., A Functional Framework for Evaluating Method Engineering Environments: the Case of Maestro II / Decamerone and MetaEdit+, in: Brinkkemper, S., Lyytinen, K., Welke, R.J. (Eds.), Method Engineering, Principles of Method Construction and Tool Support, Proceedings of the IFIP TC8, WG8.1/8.2 Working Conference on Method Engineering (Chapman & Hall, Atlanta, USA, 1996), 63-85.
21. OMG, MDA Guide Version 1.0.1, Miller, J., Mukerji, J. (Eds.), 2003, http://www.omg.org/does/omg/03-06-01.pdf, (Access: 15. July 2005).
22. Pereira, C.M., Sousa, P., A Methode to Define an Enterprise Architecture using the Zachman Framework, in: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM symposium on Applied computing, SESSION: Organizational engineering (OE) (ACM Press, New York, NY, Nicosia, Cyprus, 2004), 1366-1371.
23. Powell, A., Vickers, A., Williams, E., Cooke, B., A practical strategy for evaluation of software tools, in: Brinkkemper, S., Lyytinen, K., Welke, R.J. (Eds.), Method Engineering, Principles of Method Construction and Tool Support, Proceedings of the IFIP TC8, WG8.1/8.2 Working Conference on Method Engineering (Chapman & Hall, Atlanta, USA, 1996), 165-185.
24. Rolland, C., Prakash, N., A proposal for context-specific method engineering, in: Brinkkemper, S., Lyytinen, K., Welke, R.J. (Eds.), Method Engineering, Principles of Method Construction and Tool Support, Proceedings of the IFIP TC8, WG8.1/8.2 Working Conference on Method Engineering (Chapman & Hall, Atlanta, USA, 1996), 191-208.
25. Scheer, A.-W., ARIS - Business Process Frameworks, 3rd completely revised and enlarged edition (Springer, Berlin et al., 1999).
26. Schekkerman, J., How to survive in the jungle of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks - Creating or choosing an Enterprise Architecture Framework, Second Edition (Trafford, Canada, 2004).
27. Siegel, J., Developing in OMG's Model-Driven Architecture, Object Management Groupt White Paper, OMG Staff Strategy Group, Revision 2.6, (November 2001).
28. Sinz, E.J., Architektur von Informationssystemen, in: Rechenberg, P., Pomberger, G. (Eds.), Informatik-Handbuch (Hanser-Verlag, Munchen, 1997), 875-887.
29. Smolander, K., Lyytinen, K., Tahvanainen, V.-P., Marttiin, P., Meta-Edit - A Flexible Graphical Environment for Methodology Modelling, in: Andersen, R., Bubenko jr., J.A. (Eds.), Advanced Information System Engineering, 3rd International Conference, CAiSE '91, Vol. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 498 (Springer, Trondheim, Norway, 1991), 168-193.
30. Sowa, J.F., Zachman, J.A., Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture, IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 31, No. 3 (1992), 590-616.
31. System and Software Consortium, Zachman, 2004, http://www.software.org/ pub/architecture/zachman.asp, (Access: 15. July 2005).
32. The Open Group, Other Architectures and Architectural Frameworks, 2002, http://www.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf8-doc/arch/p4/others/others.htm, (Access: 29. June 2005).
33. The Open Group, Welcome to TOGAF - The Open Group Architectural Framework, 2002, http://www.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf8-doc/arch/p1/ preface.htm, (Access: 5. July 2005).
34. Tolvanen, J.-P., Method engineering: current research directions and implications for future research, in: Brinkkemper, S., Lyytinen, K., Welke, R.J. (Eds.), Method Engineering - Principles of Method Construction and Tool Support, Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 WG8.1/8.2 Working Conference on Method Engineering (Chapmann Hall, Atlanta, USA, 1996), 296-317.
35. Zachman, J.A., A framework for information systems architecture, IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 26, No. 3 (1987), 276-295.