The green IT practices of Nokia, Samsung, Sony, And Sony Ericsson: Content analysis approach

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Wati, Yulia ^a   Koo, Chulmo ^a  

^a Chosun University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTENT ANALYSIS; CONTENT ANALYSIS METHOD; ELECTRONIC COMPANIES; ELECTRONICS COMPANY; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES; ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT; ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY; GREEN IT; IT INDUSTRY; PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION; REGULATIONS AND POLICY; SAMSUNG; SONY ERICSSON;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY;

ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS;

EID: 77951745981     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2010.480     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Hendry, Jamie R., P. A. Vesilind. Ethical motivations for green business and engineering. Clean Techn Environ Policy 7: 2005, pp. 252-258.
2. Pujari, Devashish, Gillian Wright, Ken Peattie. Green and competitive influences on environmental new product development performance. Journal of Business Research 56, 2003, pp. 657-671. (Pubitemid 36688440)
3. Murugesan, San. Harnessing Green IT: Principles and Practices. IT Pro January/February 2008.
4. Heart, Sunil. Sustainability management of electronic waste (e-Waste). Clean 2007, 35 (4), pp. 305-510.
5. Newton, Tim, George Harte. Green Business: Technicist Kitsch? J. of Management Studies 34, 2003.
6. Maxwell, James, Sandra Rothenberg, Forrest Briscoe, Alfred Marcus. California Management Review, Vol. 39, No. 3, 1997.
7. Rugman, Alan M., Alain Verbeke. Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organizing framework. Strategic management journal, Vol. 19, 1998, pp. 363-375. (Pubitemid 128469374)
8. OpinionWire by Butler Group (www.butlergroup.com). Datamonitor, March 2007. Marketwatch Technology. www.datamonitor.com
9. Porter, Michael E, Claas V.D. Linde. Toward a new conception of the environment Competitiveness relationship. Journal of economic perspectives, Vol. 9, No. 4, 1995, pp. 97-118.
10. www.greenpeace.org/electronics
11. Krippendorff, Klaus. Content Analysis; An Intro. to its Methodology, Beverly Hills CA: Sage, 1980.
12. Weber, Robert Philip. Basic Content Analysis. 2nd ed., Newbury Park, CA: Sage 1990.
13. Bryman A, Bell E. Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2003.
14. Fraser, Janet Haddock, Lain Fraser. Assessing corporate environmental reporting motivations: Differences between close to market and business to business companies. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management 15, 2008, pp. 140-155.
15. Kolbe, Richard H, Melissa S. Burnett. Content analysis research: an examination of applications with directives for improving research reliability and objectivity. The Journal of Customer Research, Vol. 18, No.2, 1991, pp. 243-250.
16. Lijphart, Arend. Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. American Political Science Review, 65 September 1971, pp. 682-693.
17. Cameron, Kirk W. Green Introspection. Published by the IEEE Computer Society, 2009.
18. 2008 Samsung electronic sustainability report
19. Sony CSR Report 2008
20. Nokia CSR Report 2007
21. Sony Ericsson CSR Report Online 2008
22. Neuendorf, K. A. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, 2002, CA: sage.
23. Haberman, S.J. Electronic Essay Grading. Handbook of Statistics Vol. 26 Psychometrics, Edited by C.R. Rao and Sandip Sinharay, North Holland Publisher, 2007.
24. Riffe, Daniel. Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content analysis in Research (Lea Communication Series), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2 edition, 2005
25. United Nations, ESCAP, available at http://www.greengrowth.org/policies. asp