Controlling invasive species in complex social landscapes

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 210-216

  Epanchin Niell, Rebecca S ^a   Hufford, Matthew B ^a   Asian, Clare E ^a   Sexton, Jason P ^a   Port, Jeffrey D ^a   Waring, Timothy M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; COLLECTIVE ACTION; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; HERB; INCENTIVE; INVASIVE SPECIES; LAND CLASSIFICATION; LAND MANAGEMENT; LAND USE CHANGE; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; PROPAGULE; RESTORATION ECOLOGY;

CALIFORNIA; SIERRA NEVADA [CALIFORNIA]; UNITED STATES;

CENTAUREA; CENTAUREA SOLSTITIALIS;

EID: 77951727484     PISSN: 15409295     EISSN: 15409309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/090029     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Asian C, Hufford M, Epanchin-Niell R, et al. 2009. Practical challenges in private stewardship of rangeland ecosystems: yellow starthistle control in Sierra Nevadan foothills. Rangeland Ecol Manag 62: 28-37.
2. Bean J. 2006. Growth of the CWMA concept. Seventh Annual National Invasive Weeds Awareness Week; 2 Mar 2006; Washington, DC. Bozeman, MT: Center for Invasive Plant Management. www.weedcenter.org/cwmas/docs/J%20Bean% 20Growth%20of%20the%20CWMA%20Concept.pdf. Viewed 1 May 2009.
3. Beatley T and Manning K. 1997. The ecology of place: planning for environment, economy, and community. Washington, DC: Island Press.
4. Bhat MG, Huffaker RG, and Lenhart SM. 1996. Controlling transboundary wildlife damage: modeling under alternative management scenarios. Ecol Model 92: 215-224 (Pubitemid 27019225)
5. Dehnen Schmutz K, Perrings C, and Williamson M. 2004. Controlling Rhododendron ponticum in the British Isles: an economic analysis. J Environ Manage 70: 323-332 (Pubitemid 38444397)
6. Dietz T, Ostrom E, and Stern PC. 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302: 1907-1912
7. DiTomaso JM. 2005. Yellow starthistle. In: Duncan CL and Clark JK (Eds). Invasive plants of range and wildlands and their environmental, economic, and societal impacts. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America.
8. DiTomaso JM, Kyser GB, and Pitcairn MJ. 2006. Yellow starthistle management guide. Berkeley, CA: California Invasive Plant Council. Cal-IPC Publication 2006-2103
9. Fiege M. 2005. The weedy west: mobile nature, boundaries, and common space in the Montana landscape. Western Hist Quart 36: 22-47.
10. Hackett SC. 1992. Heterogeneity and the provision of governance for common-pool resources. J Theor Polit 4: 325-342
11. Hardin G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243-1248
12. Hershdorfer ME, Fernandez-Gimenez ME, and Howery LD. 2007. Key attributes influence the performance of local weed management programs in the southwest United States. Rangeland Ecol Manag 60: 225-234
13. Higgins A, Serbesoff-King K, King M, and O'Reilly-Doyle K. 2007. The power of partnerships: landscape scale conservation through public/private collaboration. Nat Area J 27: 236-250 (Pubitemid 47106300)
14. John D, Wu C, Horta K, et al. 2006. Top-down, grassroots, and civic environmentalism: three ways to protect ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 4: 45-51.
15. Klepeis P, Gill N, and Chisholm L. 2009. Emerging amenity landscapes: invasive weeds and land subdivision in rural Australia. Land Use Policy 26: 380-392
16. Lodge DM, Williams S, Maclsaac HJ, et al. 2006. Biological invasions: recommendations for US policy and management. Ecol Appl 16: 2035-2054
17. Lubell M, Schneider M, Scholz JT, and Mete M. 2002. Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions. Am J Polit Sci 46: 148-163 (Pubitemid 33374092)
18. Midwest Invasive Plant Network. 2006. CWMA cookbook: a recipe for success. www.mipn.org/MIPN%20Cookbook.pdf. Viewed 23 Mar 2009.
19. Olson M. 1965. The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21. Ostrom E, Burger J, Field CB, et al. 1999. Sustainability - revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science 284: 278-282
22. Schneider M, Scholz J, Lubell M, et al. 2003. Building consensual institutions: networks and the national estuary program. Am J Polit Sci 47: 143-158
23. Simberloff D, Parker IM, and Windle PN. 2005. Introduced species policy, management, and future research needs. Front Ecol Environ 3: 12-20. (Pubitemid 40335931)
24. Standiford RB, Klein J, and Garrison B. 1996. Sustainability of Sierra Nevada hardwood rangelands. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: final report to Congress, vol III. Assessments and scientific basis for management options. Davis, CA: University of California, Davis.
25. Stokes KE, O'Neill KP, Montgomery WI, et al. 2006. The importance of stakeholder engagement in invasive species management: a cross-jurisdictional perspective in Ireland. Biodivers Conserv 15: 2829-2852
26. US Department of Agriculture-National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2005. County agricultural commissioners' data. www.nass.usda.gov. Viewed 16 Apr 2008.
27. Wilen J. 2007. Economics of spatial-dynamic processes. Am J Agr Econ 89:1134-1144
28. Williams JA and West CJ. 2000. Environmental weeds in Australia and New Zealand: issues and approaches to management. Austral Ecol 25:425-444