Communities, clustering phase transitions, and hysteresis: Pitfalls in constructing network ensembles

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2010, Pages

  Foster, David ^a   Foster, Jacob ^a   Paczuski, Maya ^a   Grassberger, Peter ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AVERAGE DEGREE; CLUSTER CORES; CLUSTERED NETWORKS; ERGODICITY; FIRST ORDER TRANSITIONS; IDENTICAL DEGREE; INTERCONNECTED NODES; MULTIPLE JUMPS; NETWORK ENSEMBLE; NULL MODEL; ORDER PARAMETER; REAL-WORLD; REAL-WORLD NETWORKS; REGULAR GRAPHS; SAMPLING TIME; SCALE-FREE;

DRUG PRODUCTS PLANTS; HYSTERESIS;

PHASE TRANSITIONS;

EID: 77951709870     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.046115     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. R. Guimera, L. Danon, A. Diaz-Guilera, F. Giralt, and A. Arenas, Phys. Rev. E 68, 065103 (R) (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.065103
2. M. E. J. Newman and J. Park, Phys. Rev. E 68, 036122 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.036122
3. J. Davidsen, H. Ebel, and S. Bornholdt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 128701 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.128701
4. A. Broder, R. Kumar, F. Maghoul, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, R. Stata, A. Tomkins, and J. Wiener, Comput. Netw. 33, 309 (2000). 10.1016/S1389-1286(00) 00083-9
5. M. Baiesi and M. Paczuski, Phys. Rev. E 69, 066106 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066106
6. J. Davidsen, P. Grassberger, and M. Paczuski, Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L11304 (2006). 10.1029/2006GL026122
7. D. Hughes, M. Paczuski, R. O. Dendy, P. Helander, and K. G. McClements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 131101 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.131101
8. H. Jeong, B. Tombor, R. Albert, Z. N. Oltvai, and A. Barabási, Nature (London) 407, 651 (2000). 10.1038/35036627
9. M. E. J. Newman, S. H. Strogatz, and D. J. Watts, Phys. Rev. E 64, 026118 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.026118
10. M. E. J. Newman, Phys. Rev. E 68, 026121 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevE.68. 026121
11. S. Wasserman and K. Faust, Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1994).
12. M. E. J. Newman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 208701 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 89.208701
13. M. E. J. Newman and M. Girvan, Phys. Rev. E 69, 026113 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113
14. J. G. Foster, D. V. Foster, P. Grassberger, and M. Paczuski, Phys. Rev. E 76, 046112 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.046112
15. P. Erdos and A. Renyi, Publ. Math. (Debrecen) 6, 156 (1959).
16. A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert, Science 286, 509 (1999). 10.1126/science.286.5439.509
17. R. Milo, S. Shen-Orr, S. Itzkovitz, N. Kashtan, D. Chklovskii, and U. Alon, Science 298, 824 (2002). 10.1126/science.298.5594.824
18. M. Molloy and B. Reed, Random Struct. Algorithms 6, 161 (1995).
19. S. Maslov and K. Sneppen, Science 296, 910 (2002). 10.1126/science. 1065103
20. K. Baskerville, P. Grassberger, and M. Paczuski, Phys. Rev. E 76, 036107 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.036107
21. S. N. Dorogovtsev, J. F. F. Mendes, and A. N. Samukhin, Phys. Rev. E 63, 062101 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.062101
22. P. Holme and B. J. Kim, Phys. Rev. E 65, 026107 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.026107
23. A. Barrat and R. Pastor-Satorras, Phys. Rev. E 71, 036127 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.036127
24. E. Volz, Phys. Rev. E 70, 056115 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.056115
25. M. A. Serrano and M. Boguñá, Phys. Rev. E 72, 036133 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.036133
26. B. Bollobas, Random Graphs (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2001).
27. J. Berg and M. Lässig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 228701 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.228701
28. J. Park and M. E. J. Newman, Phys. Rev. E 70, 066117 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066117
29. Z. Burda, J. Jurkiewicz, and A. Krzywicki, Phys. Rev. E 69, 026106 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026106
30. J. Park and M. E. J. Newman, Phys. Rev. E 72, 026136 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.026136
31. This transition can also be seen as a first order percolation transition, since a giant percolating cluster is formed when the triangle fugacity is increased through the critical point. It is, however, substantially different from 'explosive percolation' in Achlioptas processes, which is also a first order percolation transition. While the Strauss model is a genuine thermodynamic model with Hamiltonian structure, and the phase transition happens as a true control parameter is increased, explosive percolation is a strictly nonequilibrium process where the control is done via a density of established bonds. One could also try to control the bond density in the Strauss model. This would lead to a continuous transition with phase coexistence, as in any system that undergoes a thermodynamic first order transition.
32. H. D. Young, R. A. Freedman, T. R. Sandin, and A. L. Ford, Sears and Zemansky's University Physics, 10th ed. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1999).
33. O. Perković, K. Dahmen, and J. P. Sethna, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4528 (1995). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4528
34. P. Cizeau, S. Zapperi, G. Durin, and H. E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4669 (1997). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.4669
35. A. Clauset, M. E. J. Newman, and C. Moore, Phys. Rev. E 70, 066111 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066111
36. M. A. Serrano and M. Boguñá, Phys. Rev. E 74, 056114 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.056114
37. M. E. J. Newman and G. T. Barkema, Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics (Oxford University Press, New York, 1999).
38. A. Jamakovic, P. Mahadevan, A. Vahdat, M. Boguñá, and D. Krioukov, e-print arXiv:0908.1143.
39. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, Nature (London) 393, 440 (1998). 10.1038/30918
40. A. Barrat and M. Weigt, Eur. Phys. J. B 13, 547 (2000). 10.1007/s100510050067
41. C. E. Porter, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10, 00 (2004).
42. S. Fortunato, Phys. Rep. 486, 75 (2010). 10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002
43. M. E. J. Newman, Phys. Rev. E 69, 066133 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevE.69. 066133
44. W. K. Hastings, Biometrika 57, 97 (1970). 10.1093/biomet/57.1.97
45. M. E. J. Newman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 404 (2001). 10.1073/pnas.021544898
46. A. Gavin, Nature (London) 415, 141 (2002). 10.1038/415141a
47. M. Newman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 8577 (2006). 10.1073/pnas.0601602103
48. E. Ravasz and A. L. Barabási, Phys. Rev. E 67, 026112 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.026112
49. S. N. Soffer and A. Vázquez, Phys. Rev. E 71, 057101 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.057101
50. E. Ravasz, A. L. Somera, D. A. Mongru, Z. N. Oltvai, and A.-L. Barabási, Science 297, 1551 (2002). 10.1126/science.1073374
51. E. A. Leicht, P. Holme, and M. E. J. Newman, Phys. Rev. E 73, 026120 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.026120
52. Y. Ahn, J. Bagrow, and S. Lehmann, arXiv:0903.3178 (unpublished).
53. M. E. J. Newman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 058701 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.058701
54. D. Achlioptas, R. D'Souza, and J. Spencer, Science 323, 1453 (2009). 10.1126/science.1167782
55. D. V. Foster (unpublished).