Psychological distance to a prospective memory cue influences the probability of fulfilling a delayed intention

Memory

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 284-292

  Rummel, Jan ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Construal level theory; Cue specificity; Delayed intention; Prospective memory

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; MEMORY; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; REACTION TIME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CUES; HUMANS; MEMORY; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 77951696795     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: 14640686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09658211003601514     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 609-622.
2. Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Algom, D. (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(4), 610-622.
3. Cherry, K. E., Martin, R. C., Simmons-D'Gerolamo, S. S., Pinkston, J. B., Griffing, A., & Gouvier, W. D. (2001). Prospective remembering in younger and older adults: Role of the prospective cue. Memory, 9(3), 177-193.
4. Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (2005). Associating a time-based prospective memory task with an expected context can improve or impair intention completion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 345-360.
5. Einstein, G. O., Holland, L. J., McDaniel, M. A., & Guynn, M. J. (1992). Age-related deficits in prospective memory: The influence of task complexity. Psychology and Aging, 7(3), 471-478.
6. Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 717-726.
7. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Richardson, S. L., Guynn, M. J., & Cunfer, A. R. (1995). Aging and prospective memory: Examining the influences of self-initiated retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 996-1007.
8. Ellis, J., & Milne, A. (1996). Retrieval cue specificity and the realization of delayed intentions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49(4), 862-887.
9. Hannon, B., & Daneman, M. (2007). Prospective memory: The relative effects of encoding, retrieval, and the match between encoding and retrieval. Memory, 15(5), 572-604.
10. Liberman, N., Trope, Y., McCrea, S. M., & Sherman, S. J. (2007a). The effect of level of construal on the temporal distance of activity enactment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(1), 143-149.
11. Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. (2007b). Psychological distance. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (Vol. 2, pp. 353-381). New York: Guilford Press.
12. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Cook, G. I. (2006). Task interference from prospective memories covaries with contextual associations of fulfilling them. Memory & Cognition, 34(5), 1037-1045.
13. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Cook, G. I., Hansen, J. S., & Pallos, A. L. (2003). Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an eventbased intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(5), 861-870.
14. McDaniel, M. A., Robinson-Riegler, B., & Einstein, G. O. (1998). Prospective remembering: Perceptually driven or conceptually driven processes? Memory & Cognition, 26(1), 121-134.
15. McGann, D., Ellis, J. A., & Milne, A. (2002). Conceptual and perceptual processes in prospective remembering: Differential influence of attentional resources. Memory & Cognition, 30(7), 1021-1032.
16. McGann, D., Ellis, J. A., & Milne, A. (2003). Conceptual and perceptual processing in prospective remembering. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15(1), 19-41.
17. Meacham, J. A., & Leiman, B. (1982). Remembering to perform future actions. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts (pp. 327-336). San Francisco: Freeman.
18. Meier, B., Zimmermann, T. D., & Perrig, W. J. (2006). Retrieval experience in prospective memory: Strategic monitoring and spontaneous retrieval. Memory, 14(7), 872-889.
19. Meiser, T., & Schult, J. C. (2008). On the automatic nature of the task-appropriate processing effect in event-based prospective memory. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 290-311.
20. Nowinski, J. L., & Dismukes, K. R. (2005). Effects of ongoing task context and target typicality on prospective memory performance: The importance of associative cueing. Memory, 13(6), 649-657.
21. Otani, H., Landau, J. D., Libkuman, T. M., St Louis, J. P., Kazen, J. K., & Throne, G. W. (1997). Prospective memory and divided attention. Memory, 5(3), 343-360.
22. Raven, J. C. (1962). Advanced progressive matrices: Set II. London: Lewis.
23. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray,W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), 382-439.
24. Sugimori, E., & Kusumi, T. (2008). Relationship between cue word activation and prospective memory performance. Psychological Reports, 102(1), 317-327.
25. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403-421.
26. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.