Quantitative genetic effects of bottlenecks: Experimental evidence from a wild plant species, nigella degenii

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 101, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 298-307

  Andersson, Stefan ^a   Ellmer, Maarten ^a   Jorgensen, Tove H ^b   Palmé, Anna ^c  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^c STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bottleneck; Evolutionary constraint; G matrix; Genetic drift; Nigella degenii

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BOTTLENECK POPULATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HEREDITY; HERITABILITY; NIGELLA; NIGELLA DEGENII; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL; WILD PLANT;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; FLOWERS; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC VARIATION; MODELS, GENETIC; NIGELLA; PLANT LEAVES; POPULATION DYNAMICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

NIGELLA DEGENII;

EID: 77951694935     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: 14657333     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esp108     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Andersson S. 1997. Genetic constraints on phenotypic evolution in Nigella (Ranunculaceae). Biol J Linn Soc. 62:519-532.
2. Arnold SJ, Bürger R, Hohenlohe PA, Ajie BC, Jones AG. 2008. Understanding the evolution and stability of the G-matrix. Evolution. 62:2451-2461.
3. Avery PJ, Hill WG. 1977. Variability in genetic parameters among small populations. Genet Res. 29:193-213.
4. Barton NH, Turelli M. 2004. Effects of genetic drift on variance components under a general model of epistasis. Evolution. 58:2111-2132.
5. Bittkau C, Comes HP. 2005. Evolutionary processes in a continental island system: molecular phylogeography of the Aegean Nigella arvensis alliance (Ranunculaceae) inferred from chloroplast DNA. Mol Ecol. 14:4065-4083.
6. Briggs WH, Goldman IL. 2006. Genetic variation and selection response in model breeding populations of Brassica rapa following a diversity bottleneck. Genetics. 172:457-465.
7. Bryant EH, McCommas SA, Combs LM. 1986. The effect of an experimental bottleneck upon quantitative genetic variation in the housefly. Genetics. 114:1191-1211.
8. Carson HL, Templeton AR. 1984. Genetic revolutions in relation to speciation phenomenon: the founding of new population. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 15:97-131.
9. Cheverud JM, Vaughn TT, Pletscher LS, King-Ellison K, Bailiff J. 1999. Epistasis and the evolution of additive genetic variance in populations that pass through a bottleneck. Evolution. 53:1009-1018.
10. Cohan FM. 1984. Can uniform selection retard random genetic divergence between isolated conspecific populations? Evolution. 38:495-504.
11. Comes HP, Tribsch A, Bittkau C. 2008. Plant speciation in continental island floras as exemplified by Nigella in the Aegean archipelago. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 363:3083-3096.
12. Ellmer M, Andersson S. 2004. Inbreeding depression in Nigella degenii (Ranunculaceae): fitness components compared with morphological and phenological characters. Int J Plant Sci. 165:1055-1061.
13. Falconer SD, Mackay TFC. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Harlow (UK): Longman.
14. Fernández A, Toro MA, López-Fanjul C. 1995. The effect of inbreeding on the redistribution of genetic variance of fecundity and viability in Tribolium castaneum. Heredity. 75:376-381.
15. Flury B. 1988. Common principal components and related multivariate methods. New York: Wiley.
16. Friar EAT, Ladoux T, Roalson EH, Robichaux RH. 2000. Microsatellite analysis of a population crash and bottleneck in the Mauna Kea silversword, Argyranthemum sandwicense ssp. sandwicense (Asteraceae), and its implication for reintroduction. Mol Ecol. 9:2027-2034.
17. Goodnight C. 1988. Epistasis and the effect of founder events on the additive genetic variance. Evolution. 42:441-454.
18. Hewitt GM. 1999. Post-glacial re-colonization of European biota. Biol J Linn Soc. 68:87-112.
19. Houle D, Mezey J, Galpern P. 2002. Interpretation of the results of common principal components analyses. Evolution. 56:433-440.
20. Jones AG, Arnold SJ, Bürger R. 2003. Stability of the G-matrix in a population experiencing pleiotropic mutation, stabilizing selection and genetic drift. Evolution. 57:1747-1760.
21. Jorgensen TH, Richardson DS, Andersson S. 2006. Comparative analyses of population structure in two subspecies of Nigella degenii: evidence for diversifying selection on pollen-colour dimorphisms. Evolution. 60:518-528.
22. Lande R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain:body size allometry. Evolution. 33:402-416.
23. Leberg PL. 1992. Effects of population bottlenecks on genetic diversity as measured by allozyme electrophoresis. Evolution. 46:477-494.
24. Lee CE. 2002. Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol Evol. 17:386-391.
25. López-Fanjul C, Fernandéz A, Toro MA. 2004. Epistasis and the temporal change in the additive variance-covariance matrix induced by drift. Evolution. 58:1655-1663.
26. López-Fanjul C, Villaverde A. 1989. Inbreeding increases genetic variance for viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution. 43:1800-1804.
27. Lynch M. 1988. Design and analysis of experiments on random drift and inbreeding depression. Genetics. 120:791-807.
28. Lynch M, Walsh B. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
29. Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R. 1975. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution. 29:1-10.
30. Newman D, Pilson D. 1997. Increased probability of extinction due to decreased genetic effective population size: experimental populations of Clarkia pulchella. Evolution. 51:354-362.
31. Phillips PC. 1998a. CPCrand: randomization test of the CPC hierarchy [Internet]. [2009 Apr 5]. Available from: http://www.uoregon.edu/;pphil/ software.html.
32. Phillips PC. 1998b. H2boot: bootstrap estimates and tests of quantitative genetic data [Internet]. [2009 April 5]. Available from: http://www.uoregon. edu/;pphil/software.html.
33. Phillips PC, Arnold SJ. 1999. Hierarchical comparison of genetic variancecovariance matrices. I. Using the Flury hierarchy. Evolution. 53:1506-1515.
34. Phillips PC, Whitlock MC, Fowler K. 2001. Inbreeding changes the shape of the genetic covariance matrix in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 158:1137-1145.
35. Robertson A. 1952. The effect of inbreeding on the variation due to recessive genes. Genetics. 37:189-207.
36. Saccheri IJ, Kuussaari M, Kankare M, Vikman P, Fortelius W. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature. 392: 491-494.
37. Saccheri IJ, Nichols RA, Brakefield PM. 2001. Effects of bottlenecks on quantitative genetic variation in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Genet Res. 77:167-181.
38. Strid A. 1969. Evolutionary trends in the breeding system of Nigella (Ranunculaceae). Bot Notiser. 122:380-396.
39. Strid A. 1970. Studies in the Aegean flora. XVI. Biosystematics of the Nigella arvensis complex. Opera Bot. 28:1-169.
40. Swindell WR, Bouzat JL. 2005. Modeling the adaptive potential of isolated populations: experimental simulations using Drosophila. Evolution. 59:2159-2169.
41. van Heerwaarden B, Willi Y, Kristensen TN, Hoffmann AA. 2008. Population bottlenecks increase additive genetic variance but do not break a selection limit in rain forest Drosophila. Genetics. 179:2135-2146.
42. Wade MJ, Shuster SM, Stevens L. 1996. Inbreeding: its effect on response to selection for pupal weight and the heritable variance in fitness in the flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Evolution. 50:723-733.
43. Wang JL, Cabellero A, Keightley PD, Hill WG. 1998. Bottleneck effect on genetic variance: a theoretical investigation of the role of dominance. Genetics. 150:435-447.
44. Whitlock MC. 1995. Variance-induced peak shifts. Evolution. 49: 252-259.
45. Whitlock MC, Fowler K. 1999. The changes in genetic and environmental variance with inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 152:345-353.
46. Whitlock MC, Phillips PC, Fowler K. 2002. Persistence of changes in the genetic covariance matrix after a bottleneck. Evolution. 56:1968-1975.
47. Widén B, Andersson S, Rao GY, Widén M. 2002. Population divergence of genetic (co)variance matrices in a subdivided plant species, Brassica cretica. J Evol Biol. 15:961-970.
48. Willi Y, Van Buskirk J, Hoffmann AA. 2006. Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 37:433-458.
49. Willis JH, Orr HA. 1993. Increased heritable variation following population bottlenecks: the role of dominance. Evolution. 47:949-957.
50. Wright S. 1951. The genetical structure of populations. Ann Eugen. 15:323-354.
51. Wright S. 1978. Evolution and the genetics of populations. Vol.3. Experimental results and evolutionary deductions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52. Zeng Z-B, Cockerham CC. 1991. Variance of neutral genetic variances within and between populations for a quantitative character. Genetics. 129:535-553.