Modeling the adaptive potential of isolated populations: Experimental simulations using Drosophila

Evolution

Volumn 59, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 2159-2169

  Swindell, William R ^a   Bouzat, Juan L ^a  

^a BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Drift; Genetic variation; Heritability; Heterozygosity; Inbreeding; Selection

Indexed keywords

GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC VARIATION; HETEROZYGOSITY; POPULATION SIZE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MALE; MUTATION;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENETIC DRIFT; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; VARIATION (GENETICS);

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 27644575967     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1554/05-097.1     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Allendorf, F. W. 1986. Genetic drift and the loss of alleles versus heterozygosity. Zoo Biol. 5:181-190.
2. Atkins, K. D., and R. Thompson. 1986. Predicted and realized responses to selection for an index of bone length and body weight in Scottish blackface sheep. I. Responses in the index and component traits. Anim. Prod. 43:421-435.
3. Bouzat, J. L., H. A. Lewin, and K. N. Paige. 1998. The ghost of genetic diversity past. Am. Nat. 152:1-6.
4. Bryant, E. H., and L. M. Meffert. 1993. The effect of serial founder-flush cycles on quantitative genetic variation in the housefly. Heredity 70:122-129.
5. _. 1996. Nonadditive genetic structuring of morphometric variation in relation to a population bottleneck. Heredity 77:168-176.
6. Bryant, E. H., S. A. McCommas, and L. M. Combs. 1986. The effect of an experimental bottleneck upon quantitative genetic variation in the housefly. Genetics 114:1191-1211.
7. Bulmer, M. G. 1972. The genetic variability of polygenic characters under optimizing selection, mutation and drift. Genet. Res. 19:17-25.
8. _. 1985. The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
9. Burger, R., and R. Lande. 1994. On the distribution of the mean and variance of a quantitative trait under mutation-selection-drift balance. Genetics 138:901-912.
10. Burger, R., and M. Lynch. 1995. Evolution and extinction in a changing environment - a quantitative-genetic analysis. Evolution 49:151-163.
11. Buri, P. 1956. Gene frequency in small populations of mutant Drosophila. Evolution 10:367-402.
12. Cheverud, J. M., T. T. Vaughn, L. S. Pletscher, K. King-Ellison, J. Bailiff, E. Adams, C. Erickson, and A. Bonislawski. 1999. Epistasis and the evolution of additive genetic variance in populations that pass through a bottleneck. Evolution 53:1009-1018.
13. Clayton, G. and A. Robertson. 1955. Mutation and quantitative variation. Am. Nat. 89:151-158.
14. Conner, J. K. 2003. Artifical selection: a powerful tool for ecologists. Ecology 84:1650-1660.
15. Crnokrak, P., and S. C. H. Barrett. 2002. Purging the genetic load: a review of experimental evidence. Evolution 56:2347-2358.
16. Crow, J. F., and N. E. Morton. 1955. Measurement of gene frequency drift in small populations. Evolution 9:202-214.
17. Earnhardt, J. M., S. D. Thompson, and K. Schad. 2004. Strategic planning for captive populations: projecting changes in genetic diversity. Anim. Conserv. 7:9-16.
18. Ehiobu, N. G., M. E. Goddard, and J. F. Taylor. 1989. Effect of rate of inbreeding on inbreeding depression in Drosophila melanogaster. Theor. Appl. Genet. 77:123-127.
19. England, P. R., G. H. R. Osler, L. M. Woodworth, M. E. Montgomery, D. A. Briscoe, and R. Frankham. 2003. Effects of intense versus diffuse population bottlenecks on microsatellite genetic diversity and evolutionary potential. Conserv. Genet. 4:595-604.
20. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Longman, Harlow, U.K.
21. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.
22. Frankham, R. 1980. The founder effect and response to artificial selection in Drosophila. Pp. 87-90 in A. Robertson, ed. Selection experiments in laboratory and domestic animals. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, U.K.
23. Frankham, R., K. Lees, M. E. Montgomery, P. R. England, E. H. Lowe, and D. A. Briscoe. 1999. Do population size bottlenecks reduce evolutionary potential? Anim. Conserv. 2:255-260.
24. Frankham, R., J. D. Ballou, and D. A. Briscoe. 2002. Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
25. Franklin, I. R. 1980. Evolutionary change in small populations. Pp. 135-150 in M. E. Soulé and B. A. Wilcox eds. Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
26. Franklin, I. R. and R. Frankham. 1998. How large must populations be to retain evolutionary potential. Anim. Conserv. 1:69-71.
27. Fry, J. D., K. A. Deronde, and T. F. C. Mackay. 1995. Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogasster. Genetic analysis of selection lines. Genetics 139:1293-1307.
28. Fuerst, P. A. and T. Maruyama. 1986. Considerations on the conservation of alleles and of genic heterozygosity in small managed populations. Zoo Biol. 5:171-179.
29. Garcia, N., C. Lopez-Fanjul, A. Garcia-Dorado. 1994. The genetics of viability in Drosophila melanogaster: effects of inbreeding and artificial selection. Evolution 48:277-1285.
30. Garcia-Dorado, A., J. Fernandez, and C. Lopez-Fanjul. 2000. Temporal uniformity of the spontaneous mutational variance of quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetic. Res. 75:47-51.
31. Geber, M. A., and T. E. Dawson. 1993. Evolutionary responses of plants to global change. Pp. 179-197 in P. M. Kareiva, J. G. Kingsolver, and R. B. Huey, eds. Biotic interactions and global change. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
32. Goodnight, C. J. 1988. Epistasis and the effect of founder events on the additive genetic variance. Evolution 42:441-454.
33. Hill, W. G. 2000. Maintenance of quantitative genetic variation in animal breeding programmes. Live. Prod. Science 63:99-109.
34. Hill, W. G., and A. Caballero. 1992. Artifical selection experiments. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23:287-310.
35. Hoffman, A. A., and P. A. Parsons. 1991. Evolutionary genetics and environmental stress. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
36. Hoffman, A. A., and M. W. Blows. 1993. Evolutionary genetics and climate change: Will animals adapt to global warming? Pp. 165-178 in P. M. Kareiva, J. G. Kingsolver, and R. B. Huey, eds. Biotic interactions and global change. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
37. Houle, D. 1989. The maintainance of polygenic variation in finite populations. Evolution 43:1767-1780.
38. Houle, D., B. Morikawa, and M. Lynch. 1996. Comparing mutational variabilities. Genetics 143:1467-1483.
39. Hummel, T. J., and J. Sligo. 1971. Empirical comparison of univariate and multivariate analysis of variance procedures. Psych. Bull. 76:49-57.
40. James, J. W. 1971. The founder effect and response to artificial selection. Genet. Res. Camb. 16:241-250.
41. Kerr, S. E., and S. Wright. 1954. Experimental studies of the distribution of gene frequencies in very small populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Forked. Evolution 8:172-177.
42. Kimura, M. 1965. A stochastic model concerning the maintainance of genetic variability in quantitative characters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 54:731-736.
43. _. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
44. Kimura, M. and J. F. Crow. 1964. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49:725-738.
45. Lande, R. 1976. Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30:314-334.
46. _. 1981. The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation between and within populations. Genetics 99:541-553.
47. _. 1995a. Mutation and conservation. Conserv. Biol. 9:782-791.
48. _. 1995b. Breeding plans for small populations based on the dynamics of quantitative genetic variance. Pp. 318-314 in J. D. Ballou, M. Gilpin, and T. J. Foose, eds. Population management for survival and recovery: analytical methods and strategies in small population conservation. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
49. Lande, R., and G. F. Barrowclough. 1987. Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population management. Pp. 87-123 in M. E. Soulé, ed. Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
50. Latter, B. D. H. 1970. Selection in finite populations with multiple alleles. II. Centripetal selection, mutation, and isoallelic variation. Genetics 66:165-186.
51. Leberg, P. L. 1992. Effects of population bottlenecks on genetic diversity as measured by allozyme electrophoresis. Evolution 46:477-494.
52. Lopez-Fanjul, C., J. Guerra, and A. Garcia. 1989. Changes in the distribution of the genetic variance of a quantitative trait in small populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Sel. Evol. 21:159-168.
53. Lopez, M. A. and C. Lopez-Fanjul. 1993. Spontaneous mutation for a quantitative trait in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Distribution of mutant effects on the trait and fitness. Genet. Res. 61:117-126.
54. Lynch, M. 1988. The rate of polygenic mutation. Genet. Res. 51:137-148.
55. _. 1996. A quantitative-genetic perspective on conservation issues. Pp. 471-501 in J. Avise and J. Hamrick, eds. Conservation genetics: case histories from nature. Chapman and Hall, New York.
56. Lynch, M., and W. G. Hill. 1986. Phenotypic evolution by neutral mutation. Evolution 40(5):915-935.
57. Lynch, M., and R. Lande. 1993. Evolution and extinction in response to environmental change. Pp. 234-250 in P. M. Kareiva, J. G. Kingsolver, and R. B. Huey, eds. Biotic interactions and global change. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
58. _. 1998. The critical size for a genetically secure population. Anim. Conserv. 1:70-72.
59. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
60. Mackay, T. F. C. 1980. Genetic variance, fitness, and homeostasis in varying environments: an experimental check of the theory. Evolution 34:1219-1222.
61. Mackay, T. F. C., R. F. Lyman, M. S. Jackson, C. Terzian, and W. G. Hill. 1992. Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster. estimates from divergence among inbred strains. Evolution 46:300-316.
62. Mackay, T. F. C., J. D. Fry, R. F. Lyman, and S. V. Nuzhdin. 1994. Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: estimates from response to selection of inbred strains. Genetics 136:937-951.
63. Mackay, T. F. C., R. F. Lyman, and W. G. Hill. 1995. Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: nonlinear divergence among unselected strains. Genetics 139(2):849-859.
64. Mousseau, T. A. and D. A. Roff. 1987. Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity 59:181-197.
65. Nei, M., T. Maruyama, and R. Chakraborty. 1975. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29:1-10.
66. O'Brien, S. J. 1994. Genetic and phylogenetic analyses of endangered species. Annu. Rev. Genet. 28:467-489.
67. Reed, D. H., E. H. Lowe, D. A. Briscoe, and R. Frankham. 2003. Fitness and adaptation in a novel environment: effect of inbreeding, prior environment, and lineage. Evolution 57:1822-1828.
68. Rencher, A. C. 2002. Methods of multivariate analysis, second edition. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
69. Robertson, A. 1952. The effect of inbreeding on the variation due to recessive genes. Genetics 37:189-207.
70. Ruano, R. G., L. S. Silvela, C. Lopez-Fanjul, and M. A. Toro. 1996. Changes in the additive variance of a fitness-related trait with inbreeding in Tribolium castaneum. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 113:93-97.
71. Saccheri, I. J., R. A. Nichols, P. M. Brakefield. 2001. Effects of bottlenecks on quantitative genetic variation in the butterfly Bi-cyclus anynana. Genet. Res. Camb. 77:167-181.
72. Shaffer, M. K. 1981. Minimum viable population sizes for species conservation. Bioscience 31:131-134.
73. Sherwin, W. and C. Moritz. 2000. Managing and monitoring genetic erosion. Pp. 9-34 in Genetics, demography, and viability of fragmented populations. A. G. Young and G. M. Clarke, eds. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
74. Soulé, M. E. 1987. Introduction. Pp. 1-10 in M. E. Soulé, ed. Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
75. Taylor, A. C., W. B. Sherwin, and R. K. Wayne. 1994. Genetic variation of microsattelite loci in a bottlenecked species: the northern hairy nosed wombat Lasiorhinus krefftii. Mol. Ecol. 7:381-397.
76. Turelli, M. 1984. Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. Theor. Popul. Biol. 25:138-193.
77. Wade, M. J., S. M. Schuster, and L. Stevens. 1996. Inbreeding: its effect on response to selection for pupal weight and the heritable variance in fitness in the flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Evolution 50:723-733.
78. Whitlock, M. C., and K. Fowler. 1999. The changes in genetic and environmental variance with inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 152:345-353.
79. Wright, S. 1951. The genetical structure of populations. Ann. Eugen. 15:323-354.
80. Wright, S., and W. E. Kerr. 1954. Experimental studies of the distribution of gene frequencies in very small populations of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Bar. Evolution 8:225-240.
81. Zeng, Z. B., D. Houle, and C. C. Cockerham. 1990. How informative is wright estimator of the number of genes affecting a quantitative character. Genetics 126:235-247.