A xenon-based molecular sensor assembled on an MS2 viral capsid scaffold

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 132, Issue 17, 2010, Pages 5936-5937

  Meldrum, Tyler ^a,b   Seim, Kristen L ^a,b   Bajaj, Vikram S ^a,b   Palaniappan, Krishnan K ^a,b   Wu, Wesley ^a,b   Francis, Matthew B ^a,b   Wemmer, David E ^a,b   Pines, Alexander ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMICAL STRUCTURES; CHEMICAL MOIETIES; CONTRAST AGENT; DETECTION OF CHEMICALS; HOST GUEST COMPLEXES; HYPERPOLARIZED XENON; MOLECULAR IMAGING; MOLECULAR SENSORS; MOLECULAR TARGETS; MULTIVALENCY; SENSOR MOLECULES; SIGNAL AMPLIFICATIONS; VIRAL CAPSIDS;

AMPLIFICATION; CHEMICAL DETECTION; MAGNETIC PROPERTIES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SCAFFOLDS; SENSORS; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

XENON;

APTAMER; CELL RECEPTOR; CONTRAST MEDIUM; MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD; NANOPARTICLE; XENON;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOSENSOR; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; DEVICE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POLARIZATION; PROTEIN BINDING; SOLUBILITY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SYNTHESIS; TARGET CELL; VIRUS CAPSID;

CAPSID; CONTRAST MEDIA; LEVIVIRUS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; XENON ISOTOPES;

EID: 77951675207     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: 15205126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja100319f     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Hendrick, R. E. and Haacke, E. M. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1993, 3, 137-148
2. Sherry, A. D. and Woods, M. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2008, 10, 391-411
3. Zhang, S., Merritt, M., Woessner, D., Lenkinski, R. E., and Sherry, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 783-790
4. Berthault, P., Huber, G., and Desvaux, H. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2009, 55, 35-60
5. Goodson, B. J. Magn. Reson. 2002, 155, 157-216
6. Seward, G. K., Wei, Q., and Dmochowski, I. J. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008, 19, 2129-2135
7. Tong, G. J., Hsiao, S. C., Carrico, Z. M., and Francis, M. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 11174-11178
8. Allen, M., Bulte, J., Liepold, L., Basu, G., Zywicke, H., Frank, J., Young, M., and Douglas, T. Magn. Reson. Med. 2005, 54, 807-812
9. Datta, A., Hooker, J., Botta, M., Francis, M., Aime, S., and Raymond, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2546-2552
10. Hooker, J. M., Datta, A., Botta, M., Raymond, K. N., and Francis, M. B. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 2207-2210
11. Prasuhn, D., Jr., Yeh, R., Obenaus, A., Manchester, M., and Finn, M. Chem. Commun. 2007, 1269-1271
12. Wu, W., Hsaio, S. C., Carrico, Z. M., and Francis, M. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9493-9497
13. Spence, M. M., Rubin, S. M., Dimitrov, I. E., Ruiz, E. J., Wemmer, D. E., and Pines, A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98, 10654-10657
14. Schröder, L., Lowery, T., Hilty, C., Wemmer, D., and Pines, A. Science 2006, 314, 446-449
15. Ruppert, K., Brookeman, J. R., Hagspiel, K. D., and Mugler, J. P. I. Magn. Reson. Med. 2000, 44, 349-357
16. Schröder, L., Meldrum, T., Smith, M., Lowery, T., Wemmer, D., and Pines, A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 257603(4)
17. Refinements to the xenon delivery system plus an increase of the xenon gas concentration from 1% to 2% have reduced shot noise and increased signal considerably.
18. Bajaj, V. S., Meldrum, T., Wemmer, D. E., and Pines, A. J. Magn. Reson. 2010, in press.
19. Mynar, J. L., Lowery, T. J., Wemmer, D. E., Pines, A., and Fréchet, J. M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6334-6335
20. Ersoy, H. and Rybicki, F. J. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007, 26, 1190-1197
21. Wei, Q., Seward, G., Hill, P., Patton, B., Dimitrov, I., Kuzma, N., and Dmochowski, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 9, 13274-13283
22. Lerouge, F., Melnyk, O., Durand, J., Raehm, L., Berthault, P., Huber, G., Desvaux, H., Constantinesco, A., Choquet, P., and Detour, J. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 379-386
23. Zhou, X., Graziani, D., and Pines, A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106, 16903-16906
24. Schrank, G., Ma, Z., Schoeck, A., and Saam, B. Phys. Rev. A 2009, 80, 063424(10)