Effect of conical configuration of fixture on the maintenance of marginal bone level: Preliminary results at 1 year of function

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 439-444

  Kim, Jung Joo ^a   Lee, Dong Won ^a   Kim, Chong Kwan ^b   Park, Kwang Ho ^a   Moon, Ik Sang ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University College of Dentistry   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Conical neck; Implant; Marginal bone; Micro thread; Straight neck

Indexed keywords

AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 77951638085     PISSN: 09057161     EISSN: 16000501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01871.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. Tissue characteristics at microthreaded implants: an experimental study in dogs. Clinical Implant Dentistry & Related Research 2006, 8:107-113.
2. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. Effects of different implant surfaces and designs on marginal bone-level alterations: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2009, 20((Suppl. 4)):207-215.
3. Armitage G. Development of a classification system for periodontal disease and conditions. Annals of Periodontology 1999, 4:1-6.
4. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lindhe J. Bone reactions to longstanding functional load at implants: an experimental study in dogs. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2005, 32:925-932.
5. Brägger U, Häfeli U, Huber B, Hämmerle CHF, Lang NP. Evaluation of postsurgical crestal bone levels adjacent to non-submerged dental implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 1998, 9:218-224.
6. Bratu EA, Tandlich M, Shapira L. A rough surface implant neck with microthreads reduces the amount of marginal bone loss: a prospective clinical study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2009, 20:827-832.
7. Cardaropoli G, Wenström JL, Lekholm U. Peri-implant bone alterations in relation to inter-unit distances. A 3-year retrospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2003, 14:430-436.
8. Engquist B, Åstrand P, Dahlgren S, Engquist E, Feldmann H, Gröndahl K. Marginal bone reaction to oral implants: a prospective comparative study of Astra Tech and Brånemark system implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2002, 13:30-37.
9. Glantz PO, Nyman S. Technical aspects of crown and bridge therapy. Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry 1998, 727-740. In, Lindhe, J, Karring, T., Lang, N.P., eds, 3rd edition, Copenhagen, Munksgaard
10. Guo XE, Cowin SC. Mechanical properties of cortical bone and cancellous bone tissue. Bone Mechanics Handbook 2001, 1-23. ed, 2nd edition, Boca Raton, F lorida, CRC Press
11. Hansson S. The implant neck: smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach. Clinical Oral Implants Research 1999, 10:394-405.
12. Hansson S. Implant-abutment interface: biomechanical study of flat top versus conical. Clinical Implant Dentistry & Related Research 2000, 2:33-41.
13. Hansson S. A conical implant-abutment interface at the level of the marginal bone improves the distribution of stresses in the supporting bone. An axisymmetric finite element analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2003, 14:286-293.
14. Hansson S, Werke M. The implant thread as a retention element in cortical bone: the effect of thread size and thread profile: a finite element study. Journal of Biomechanics 2003, 36:1247-1258.
15. Huang HL, Chang CH, Hsu JT, Fallagatter AM, Ko CC. Comparison of implant body designs and threaded designs of dental implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2007, 22:551-562.
16. Jung YC, Han CH, Lee KW. A 1-year radiographic evaluation of marginal bone around dental implants. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1996, 11:811-818.
17. Kong L, Sun Y, Hu K, Liu Y, Li D, Qiu Z, Liu B. Selections of the cylinder implant neck taper and implant end fillet for optimal biomechanical properties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Journal of Biomechanics 2008, 41:1124-1130.
18. Lee DW, Choi YS, Park KH, Kim CS, Moon IS. Effect of micro-thread on the maintenance of marginal bone level: a 3-year prospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2007, 18:465-470.
19. Lee DW, Park KH, Moon IS. Dimension of keratinized mucosa and the interproximal papilla between adjacent implants. Journal of Periodontology 2005, 76:1856-1860.
20. Lee DW, Park KH, Moon IS. Dimension of interproximal soft tissue between adjacent implants in two distinctive implant systems. Journal of Periodontology 2006, 77:1080-1084.
21. Malevez CH, Hermans M, Daelemans PH. Marginal bone levels at Brånemark system implants used for single tooth restoration. The influence of implant design and anatomical region. Clinical Oral Implants Research 1996, 7:162-169.
22. Misch CE, Bidez MW, Misch CE. A scientific rationale for dental implant design. Contemporary Implant Dentistry 1999, 329-343. In, ed, 2nd edition, Missouri, Mosby
23. Mombelli A, van Oosten MAC, Schürch E, Lang N P. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiology and Immunology 1987, 2:145-151.
24. Nordin T, Jönsson G, Nelvig P, Rasmusson L. The use of a conical fixture design for fixed partial prostheses. A preliminary report. Clinical Oral Implants Research 1998, 9:343-347.
25. Norton MR. Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro- and microstructure. Clinical Oral Implants Research 1998, 9:91-99.
26. Norton MR. Multiple single-tooth implant restorations in the posterior jaws: maintenance of marginal bone levels with reference to the implant-abutment microgap. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2006, 21:777-784.
27. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark system. Clinical Oral Implants Research 1992, 3:104-111.
28. Rasmusson L, Kahnberg KE, Tan A. Effects of implant design and surface on bone regeneration and implant stability: an experimental study in the dog mandible. Clinical Implant Dentistry & Related Research 2001, 3:2-8.
29. Webber HP, Buser D, Fiorellini JP, Wiliams RC. Radiographic evaluation of crestal bone levels adjacent to nonsubmerged titanium implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 1992, 3:181-188.
30. Wennström JL, Ekestubbe A, Gröndahl K, Karlsson S, Lindhe J. Implant-supported single-tooth restorations: a 5-year prospective study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2005, 32:567-574.
31. Wyatt CCL, Bryant SR, Avivi-Arber L, Chaytor DV, Zarb GA. A computer-assisted measurement technique to assess bone proximal to oral implants on intraoral radiographs. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2001, 12:225-229.