Effects of implant design and surface on bone regeneration and implant stability: An experimental study in the dog mandible

Clinical implant dentistry and related research

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 2-8

  Rasmusson, Lars ^a   Kahnberg, Karl Erik ^a   Tan, Albert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOG; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; MALE; MANDIBLE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OSTEOLYSIS; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH SOCKET; TRANSDUCER; VIBRATION; WOUND HEALING;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ANIMALS; BONE REGENERATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DOGS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; MALE; MANDIBLE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH SOCKET; TRANSDUCERS; VIBRATION; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 0035235831     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00123.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. 1 D'Hoedt B. 10 Jahre Tubingen Implantat aus Frialit. Eine Zwischenauswertung der Implantatdatei. Z Zahnärts Implant 1986 ; 2: 6–10.
2. 2 Lekholm U, Adell R, Lindhe J, et al. Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures. A cross‐sectional retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986 ; 15: 53–61.
3. 3 Lundgren D, Sennerby L, Falk H, Friberg B, Nyman S. The use of a new bioresorbable barrier for guided tissue regeneration in connection with implant installation. Case report. Clin Oral Impl Res 1994 ; 6: 67–73.
4. 4 Lekholm U, Sennerby L, Roos J, Becker W. Soft tissue and marginal bone conditions at osseointegrated implants that have exposed threads: a 5‐year retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996 ; 11: 20–25, 599–604.
5. 5 Rasmusson L, Meredith N, Sennerby L. Measurements of stability changes of titanium implants with exposed threads subjected to barrier membrane‐induced bone augmentation. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997 ; 8: 316–322.
6. 6 Breine U, Brånemark P‐I. Reconstruction of alveolar jaw bone. An experimental and clinical study of immediate and preformed autologous bone grafts in combination with osseointegrated implants. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1980 ; 14: 23–48.
7. 7 Kahnberg K‐E, Nyström E, Bartholdsson L. Combined use of bone grafts and Brånemark fixtures in the treatment of severely resorbed maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989 ; 4: 297–304.
8. 8 Kahnberg K‐E, Nilsson P, Rasmusson L. Le Fort 1 osteotomy with interpositional bone grafts and implants for rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2‐stage procedure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999 ; 14: 571–578.
9. 9 Lundgren S, Rasmusson L, Sjöström M, Sennerby L. Simultaneous or delayed placement of titanium implants in free autogenous iliac bone grafts. Histological analysis of the bone graft‐titanium interface in 10 consecutive patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999 ; 28: 31–37.
10. 10 Becker W, Dahlin C, Becker BE, et al. The use of e‐PTFE barrier membranes for bone promotion around titanium implants placed into extraction sockets: a prospective multi‐center study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994 ; 9: 31–40.
11. 11 Dahlin C, Andersson L, Linde A. Bone augmentation at fen‐estrated implants by an osteopromotive membrane technique. A controlled clinical study. Clin Oral Impl Res 1991 ; 2: 159–165.
12. 12 Mellonig IT, Triplett RG. Guided tissue regeneration and endosseous dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1993 ; 13: 108–119.
13. 13 Nyman S, Lang NP. Guided tissue regeneration and dental guided tissue regeneration and dental implants. Periodon-tology 2000 1994 ; 4: 109–118.
14. 14 Jovanovic S, Spiekermann H, Richter EJ. Bone regeneration around titanium dental implants in dehisced defect sites: a clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992 ; 7: 233–245.
15. 15 Simion M, Jovanovic S, Trisi P, Scarano A, Piatelli A. Vertical ridge augmentation around dental implants using a membrane technique and autogenous bone or allografts in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998 ; 18: 9–24.
16. 16 Akimoto K, Becker W, Persson R, Baker D, Rohrer M, O'Neal R. Evaluation of titanium implants placed into simulated extraction sockets: a study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999 ; 14: 351–360.
17. 17 Carmagnola D, Araujo M, Berglundh T, Albrektsson T, Lindhe J. Bone tissue reaction around implants placed in a compromised jaw. J Clin Periodontol 1999 ; 26: 629–635.
18. 18 al Sayyed A, Deporter DA, Pilliar RM, et al. Predictable cre‐stal bone remodelling around two porous‐coated titanium alloy dental implant designs: a radiographic study in dogs. Clin Oral Impl Res 1994 ; 5: 131–141.
19. 19 Wennerberg A. On surface roughness and implant incorporation. Thesis, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden, 1996.
20. 20 Ivanoff C‐J, Hallgren C, Wennerberg A, Widmark G, Sennerby L. Histologic evaluation of the integration of TiO 2 grit‐blasted and turned titanium micro implants in humans. Clin Oral Impl Res. (In press)
21. 21 Meredith N, Cawley P, Alleyne D. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant‐tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res 1996 ; 7: 261–267.
22. 22 Meredith N, Rasmusson L, Sennerby L, Alleyne D. Mapping implant stability by resonance frequency analysis. Med Sci Res 1996 ; 24: 191–193.
23. 23 Meredith N, Book K, Friberg B, Jemt T, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997 ; 8: 226–233.
24. 24 Mustafa K, Wroblewski J, Hultenby K, Lopez B, Arvidson K. Effects of titanium surfaces blasted with TiO 2 particles on the initial attachment of cells derived from human mandibular bone. Clin Oral Impl Res 2000 ; 11: 116–128.
25. 25 Lundgren AK, Lundgren D, Wennerberg A, Hammerle C, Nyman S. Influence of surface roughness of barrier walls on guided bone augmentation: experimental study in rabbits. Clin Impl Dent Rel Res 1999 ; 1: 41–48.
26. 26 Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson L. A biomechanical and morphometrical comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992 ; 7: 62–71.
27. 27 Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Lekholm U. Influence of mono‐and bicortical anchorage on the integration of titanium implants: a study in the rabbit tibia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996 ; 25: 229–235.
28. 28 Hansson S. The implant neck: smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach. Clin Oral Impl Res 1999 ; 10: 394–405.