Teacher verbal ability and school outcomes: Where is the evidence?

Educational Researcher

Volumn 38, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 612-624

  Aloe, Ariel M ^a   Becker, Betsy Jane ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Meta analysis; Teacher assessment; Teacher characteristics

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951492052     PISSN: 0013189X     EISSN: 1935102X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X09353939     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Allen, M. (2003). Eight questions on teacher preparation: What does the research say? A summary of the findings. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
2. Aloe, A.M. (2009). A partial effect size for the synthesis of multiple regression models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.
3. Aloe, A. M., & Becker, B. J. (in press). Advances in combining regression results in meta-analysis. In M. Williams & W. P. Vogt (Eds.), Sage handbook of methodological innovation. London: Sage.
4. Aloe, A. M., Becker, B. J., & Pigott, T. (2007, July). Variance explained in metaanalysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research Synthesis Methodology, Evanston, IL.
5. Alschuler, M. D. T. (1980). The relationship of teacher characteristics and behaviors to pupil growth in the SCIS program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University.
6. Andrew, M. D., Cobb, C. D., & Giampietro, P. J. (2005). Verbal ability and teacher effectiveness. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(4), 343-354.
7. Armor, D. J. (1972). School and family effects on Black and White achievement: A reexamination of the USOE data. In F. Mosteller & D. P. Moynihan (Eds.), On equality of educational opportunity (pp. 168-229). New York: Random House.
8. Baker, L. W. (1970). An analysis of some assumed predictors of success in teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, United States International University.
9. Becker, B. J. (2000). Multivariate meta-analysis. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and math ematical modeling (pp. 499-526). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10. Becker, B. J., & Aloe, A. M. (2008, March). Teacher science knowledge and student science achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
11. Berliner, D. C. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18-20.
12. Boardman, A. E., Davis, O. A., & Sanday, P. R. (1973). A simultaneous equations model of the educational process: The Coleman data revisited with an emphasis upon achievement. Social Statistics Section Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, 62-71.
13. Boardman, A. E., Davis, O. A., & Sanday, P. R. (1977). A simultaneous equations model of the educational process. Journal of Public Economics, 7, 23-49.
14. Bowles, S. S. (1970). Towards an educational production function. In W. L. Hansen (Ed.), Education, income, and human capital (pp. 11-70). New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
15. Bowles, S. S., & Levin, H. M. (1968). More on multicollinearity and the effectiveness of schools. Journal of Human Resources, 3(3), 393-400.
16. Choi, J., Ahn, S., & Kennedy, M. (2008). Role of teacher's subject matter knowledge. Manuscript submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education.
17. Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2006). Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Human Resources, 41(4), 778-820.
18. Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, M. K. (2001). Sticks, stones, and ideology: The discourse of reform in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 30(8), 3-15.
19. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
20. College Board. (2008). 2008 Collegebound seniors total group profile report. New York: Author. Retrieved July 7, 2009, from http://professionals.collegeboard.com/profdownload/ Total_Group_Report.pdf
21. Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and metaanalysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
22. Cornett, J. D. (1969). Effectiveness of three selective admissions criteria in predicting performance of first-year teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 62, 247-250.
23. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved May 15, 2003, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1
24. Ducharme, R. J. (1970). Selected preservice factors related to success of the beginning teacher. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University.
25. Ehrenberg, R., & Brewer, D. (1994). Do school and teacher characteristics matter? Evidence from high school and beyond. Economics of Education Review, 13, 1-17.
26. Ehrenberg, R. G., & Brewer, D. J. (1995). Did teachers' verbal ability and race matter in the 1960's? Coleman revisited. Economics of Education Review, 14(1), 1-21.
27. Ekstrom, R. B. (1978, February). Relationships between teacher aptitudes, teaching behaviors, and pupil outcomes. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education, Chicago, IL.
28. Ellett, C. D., & Garland, J. S. (1987). Teacher evaluation practices in our largest school districts: Are they measuring up to "state-of-theart" systems? Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(1), 69-92.
29. Ferguson, R. F. (1991a). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28(2), 465-498.
30. Ferguson, R. F. (1991b). Racial patterns in how school and teacher quality affect achievement and earnings. Challenge, 2(1), 1-26.
31. Ferguson, R. F. (1998). Can schools narrow the Black-White test score gap? In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 318-374). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
32. Ferguson, R. F., & Ladd, H. F. (1996). How and why money matters: An analysis of Alabama schools. In H. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performancebased reform in education (pp. 265-298). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
33. Field, A. P. (2001). Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: A Monte Carlo comparison of fixed-and random-effects methods. Psychological Methods, 6(2), 161-180.
34. Gitomer, D. (2007). Teacher quality in a changing policy landscape: Improvements in the teacher pool. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved July 10, 2009, from http://www.ets.org/Media/Education_Topics/pdf/TQ_full_report.pdf
35. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3-8.
36. Greenwald, R., Hedges, L., & Laine, R. D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361-396.
37. Guyton, E., & Farokhi, E. (1987). Relationships among academic performance, basic skills, subject matter knowledge, and teaching skills of teacher education graduates. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(5), 37-42.
38. Hanushek, E. (1970a). The production of education, teacher quality, and efficiency. In A. Mood (Ed.), Do teachers make a difference? A report on recent research on pupil achievement (pp. 79-99). U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
39. Hanushek, E. (1970b). The value of teachers in teaching. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. (ERIC Accession No. ED 073 089)
40. Hanushek, E. (1971). Teacher characteristics and gains in student achievement: Estimation using micro data. American Economic Review, 61(2), 280-288.
41. Hanushek, E. (1972). Education and race. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
42. Hanushek, E. (1992). The trade-off between child quantity and quality. Journal of Political Economy, 100(1), 84-117.
43. Hanushek, E., & Kain, J. F. (1972). On the value of equality of educational opportunity as a guide to public policy. In F. Mosteller, & D. P. Moynihan (Eds.), On equality of educational opportunity (pp. 116-145). New York: Random House.
44. Haycock, K. (1998). Good teaching matters... a lot. Thinking K-12, 63(2), 3-14.
45. Hedges, L. V. (1983). A random effects model for effect size. Psychological Bulletin, 93(2), 388-395.
46. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for metaanalysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
47. Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 486-504.
48. Heller, H. W., & Clay, R. J. (1993). Predictors of teaching effectiveness: The efficacy of various standards to predict the success of graduates from a teacher education program. ERS Spectrum, 11(1), 7-11.
49. Kain, J., & Singleton, K. (1996, May-June). Equality of Education revisited. New England Economic Review, pp. 87-111.
50. Kaplan, L. S., & Owings, W. A. (2002). The politics of teacher quality: Implications for principals. NASSP Bulletin, 86, 22-41.
51. Kennedy, M. M. (2007). Defining a literature. Educational Researcher, 36(3), 139-147.
52. Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 148-161.
53. Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 37-62.
54. Levin, H. M. (1970). A new model of school effectiveness. In A. Mood (Ed.), Do teachers make a difference? A report on recent research on pupil achievement (pp. 55-78). U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
55. Levin, H. M. (1976). Concepts of economic efficiency and educational production. In J. T. Froomkin, D. T. Jamison, & R. Radner (Eds.), Education as an industry (pp. 149-191). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
56. McDonald, F. J., & Elias, P. J. (1976). Beginning Teacher Evaluation Study: Phase II, 1973-74, Final Report: Volume I. The effects of teaching performances on pupil learning (No. ETS-PR-76-6A). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
57. Metzger, S. A., & Wu, M.-J. (2008). Commercial teacher selection instruments: The validity of selecting teachers through beliefs, attitudes, and values. Review of Educational Research, 78, 921-940.
58. Moore, D. E. (1991). The relationship among selected appraisals in pre dicting effective beginning teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ball State University.
59. Murnane, R. J., & Phillips, B. R. (1979). Effective teachers of inner city children: Who they are and what they do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED166348)
60. Murnane, R. J., & Phillips, B. (1981). What do effective teachers of inner city children have in common? Social Science Research, 10, 83-100.
61. Murnane, R., Singer, J., Willett, J., Kemple, J., & Olsen, R. (Eds.). (1991). Who will teach? Policies that matter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62. Murnane, R. J., & Steele, J. L. (2007). What is the problem? The challenge of providing effective teachers for all children. The Future of Children, 17(1), 15-43.
63. Qu, Y., & Becker, B. J. (2003, April). Does traditional teacher certification imply quality? A metaanalysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
64. Raudenbush, S. W. (1994). Random effects models. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 301-321). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
65. Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (Eds.). (2005). Publication bias in metaanalysis: Prevention, assessment and adjust ments. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
66. Rutledge, S. A., Engle, W. K., & Bishop, J. L. (2008). "You wouldn't be a teacher if you are not intelligent": How principals define "quality" teachers. Unpublished manuscript.
67. Smith, M. S. (1972). Equality of educational opportunity: The basic finding reconsidered. In F. Mosteller, & D. P. Moynihan (Eds.), On equality of educational opportunity (pp. 230-342). New York: Random House.
68. Strauss, R. P., & Sawyer, E. (1986). Some new evidence on teacher and student competencies. Economics of Education Review, 5(1), 41-48.
69. Summers, A., & Wolfe, B. L. (1975). Which school resources help learning? Efficiency and equity in Philadelphia public schools. Philadelphia: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Department of Research
70. U.S. Department of Education. (2002, June). Meeting the highly quali fied teachers challenge: The secretary's annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: Author. Available from http://www.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/teachprep/2002title-ii-report.pdf
71. U.S. Department of Education. (2003, June). Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The secretary's second annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: Author. Available from http://www.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/teachprep/2003title-ii-report.pdf
72. Vance, V. S., & Schlechty, P. C. (1982). The distribution of academic ability in the teaching force: Policy implications. Phi Delta Kappan, 64, 22-27.
73. Vegas, E., Murnane, R. J., & Willett, J. B. (2001). From high school to teaching: Many steps, who makes it? Teachers College Record, 103(3), 427-449.
74. Walsh, K. (2001). Teacher certification reconsidered: Stumbling for quality. Baltimore: Abell Foundation.
75. Wayne, A. M., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89-122.
76. Webster, W. J. (1984, April). Five years of teacher testing: A retrospective analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
77. Webster, W. J. (1988). Selecting effective teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 81(4), 245-253.
78. Whitehurst, G. J. (2002, March). Scientifically based research on teacher quality: Research on teacher preparation and professional development. Paper presented at the White House Conference on Preparing Tomorrow's Teachers.
79. Wilson, S., Floden, R., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001, February). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations (R-01-3). Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.\
80. Zumwalt, K., & Craig, E. (2005). Teachers' characteristics: Research on the indicators of quality. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The Report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (pp. 157-360). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.