Mechanism-based common reactivity pattern (COREPA) modelling of aryl hydrocarbon receptor binding affinity

SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research

Volumn 21, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 187-214

  Petkov, P I ^a   Rowlands, J C ^b   Budinsky, R ^b   Zhao, B ^c   Denison, M S ^c   Mekenyan, O ^a  

^a ASSEN ZLATAROV UNIVERSITY   (Bulgaria)

^b Toxicol/Environ Res/Consulting   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor; COREPA; Gene expression; Modelling; SAR; TCDD

Indexed keywords

BINDING ENERGY; CHARGE TRANSFER; HYDROCARBONS; ORGANIC POLLUTANTS; TRANSCRIPTION;

ARYL HYDROCARBON RECEPTOR; COMMON REACTIVITY PATTERN; GENES EXPRESSION; MODELING; PROPERTY; REACTIVITY PATTERN; RECEPTOR BINDING; RELATIONSHIP MODEL; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS; TCDD;

LIGANDS;

EID: 77951476466     PISSN: 1062936X     EISSN: 1029046X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10629360903570933     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. O. Hankinson, The aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 35 (1995), pp. 307-340.
2. J.V. Schmidt and C.A. Bradfield, Ah Receptor Signaling Pathways, Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 12 (1996), pp. 55-89.
3. M.S. Denison, CF Elferink, and D. Phelan, In Toxicant-Receptor Interactions in the Modulation of Signal Transduction and Gene Expression, Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia, PA, 1998, pp. 3-33.
4. Q. Ma, Induction of CYP1A1. The AhR/DRE paradigm: transcription, receptor regulation, and expanding biological roles, Curr. Drug Met. 2 (2001), pp. 149-164.
5. J.P. Whitlock Jr, Induction of cytochrome P4501A1, Annu. Rev. Pharm. Toxicol. 39 (1999), pp. 103-125.
6. E.C. Hoffman, H. Reyes, F.F. Chu, F. Sander, L.H. Conley, B.A. Brooks, and O. Hankinson, Cloning of a factor required for activity of the Ah (dioxin) receptor, Science 252 (1991), pp. 954-958.
7. M.S. Denison, J.M. Fisher, and J.P. Whitlock, The DNA recognition site for the dioxin-Ah receptor complex. Nucleotide sequence and functional analysis, J. Biol. Chem. 263 (1988), pp. 17221-17224.
8. M.S. Denison, S.D. Seidel, W.J. Rogers, M. Ziccardi, G.M. Winter, and S. Heath-Pagliuso, Natural and synthetic ligands for the Ah receptor, in Molecular Biology Approaches to Toxicology, A. Puga and K.B. Wallace, eds., Taylor and Francis. PA, 1998, pp. 393-419.
9. J.B. LePecq, N. Dat-Xuong, C. Gosse, and C. Paoletti, A New Antitumoral Agent: 9-Hydroxyellipticine. Possibility of a Rational Design of Anticancerous Drugs in the Series of DNA Intercalating Drugs, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 71 (1974), pp. 5078-5082.
10. E. Multon, J.F. Riou, D. LaFevre, J.C. Ahomadegbe, and G. Riou, Topoisomerase II-mediated DNA cleavage activity induced by ellipticines on the human tumor cell line N417, Biochem, Pharmacol. 38 (1989), pp. 2077-2086.
11. N. Fernandez, M. Roy, and P. Lesca, Binding characteristics of Ah receptors from rats and mice before and after separation from hepatic cytosols. 7-Hydroxyellipticine as a competitive antagonist of cytochrome P-450 induction, Eur. J. Biochem. 172 (1988), pp. 585-592.
12. R.N. Kurl, P.B. DePetrillo, and M.J. Olnes, Inhibition of Ah (dioxin) receptor transformation by 9-hydroxy ellipticine: involvement of protein kinase C?, Biochem. Pharmacol. 46 (1993), pp. 1425-1433.
13. T.A. Gasiewicz, A.S. Kende, G. Rucci, B. Whitney, and J.J. Willey, Analysis of Structural Requirements for Ah Receptor Antagonist Activity: Ellipticines, Flavones, and Related Compound, Biochem. Pharmacol. 52 (1996), pp. 1787-1803.
14. J. O'Prey, J. Brown, J. Fleming, and PR. Harrison, Effects of dietary flavonoids on major signal transduction pathways in human epithelial cells, Biochem. Pharmacol. 66 (2003), pp. 2075-2088.
15. M.S. Denison, A. Pandini, S. Nagy, E. Baldwin, and L. Bonati, Ligand binding and activation of the Ah receptor, Chem. Biol. Interact. 141 (2002), pp. 3-24.
16. M.S. Denison and S.R. Nagy, Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor by structurally diverse exogenous and endogenous chemicals, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 43 (2003), pp. 309-334.
17. F.L. Stahura and J. Bajorath, New methodologies for ligand-based virtual screening, Curr. Pharm. Des. 11 (2005), pp. 1189-1202.
18. E.L. Piparo, K. Koehler, A. Chana, and E. Benfenati, Virtual Screening for Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Binding Prediction, J. Med. Chem. 49 (2006), pp. 5702-5709.
19. A. Pandini, M.S. Denison, Y. Song, A. Soshilov, and L. Bonati, Structural and functional characterization of the AhR ligand binding domain by homology modeling and mutational analysis, Biochemistry 23 (2007), pp. 696-708.
20. A. Pandini, A.A. Soshilov, Y. Song, J. Zhao, L. Bonati, and M.S. Denison, Detection of the TCDD binding fingerprint within the Ah receptor ligand binding domain by structurally driven mutagenesis and functional analysis, Biochemistry 48 (2009), pp. 5972-5983.
21. M. Wagner, J. Sadowski, and J. Gasteiger, Autocorrelation of molecular surface properties for modeling Corticosteroid Binding Globulin and cytosolic Ah receptor activity by neural networks, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117 (1995), pp. 7769-7775.
22. K. Tuppurainen and J. Ruuskanen, Electronic eigenvalue (EEVA): a new QSAR/QSPR descriptor for electronic substituent effects based on molecular orbital energies. A QSAR approach to the Ah receptor binding affinity of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and dibenzofuranes (PCDFs), Chemosphere 41 (2000), pp. 843-848.
23. A. Poland and J.C. Knutson, 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and related halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons: examination of the mechanism of toxicity, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 22 (1982), pp. 517-554.
24. J.D. McKinney, T. Darden, M.A. Lyerly, and L.G. Pederson, PCB and related compound binding to the Ah receptor(s) Theoretical madel based on molecular parameters and molecular mechanics, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 4 (1985), pp. 166-172.
25. C.L. Waller and J.D. McKinney, Comparative molecular field analysis of polyhalogenated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofuranes, and biphenyls, J. Med. Chem. 35 (1992), pp. 3660-3666.
26. C.L. Waller and J.D. McKinney, Three-dimensional quantitative-activity relationships of dioxins and dioxin-like compounds: model validation and Ah receptor characterization, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 8 (1995), pp. 847-858.
27. A. Poso, K. Tuppurainen, J. Ruuskanen, and J. Gynther, Binding of some dioxins and dibenzofuranes to the Ah receptor. A QSAR model based on comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA), J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 282 (1993), pp. 259-264.
28. S.A. Kafafi, H.Y. Afeefy, H.K. Said, and J.M. Hakimi, A new structure-activity model for Ah receptor binding. Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofuranes, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 5 (1992), pp. 856-862.
29. O.G. Mekenyan, G.D. Veith, D.J. Call, and G.T. Ankley, A QSAR evaluation of Ah receptor binding of halogenated aromatic xenobiotics, Environ. Health Persp. 104 (1996), pp. 1302-1310.
30. E. Fraschini, L. Bonati, and D. Pitea, Molecular polarizability as a tool for understanding the binding properties of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins: definition of a reliable computational procedure, J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996), pp. 10564-10569.
31. R.G. Pearson, Absolute electronegativity and hardness correlated with molecular orbital theory, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83 (1986), pp. 8440-8441.
32. R.G. Parr, L.V. Szentpaly, and S. Liu, Electrophilicity index, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121 (1999), pp. 1922-1924.
33. P.K. Chattaraj, B. Maiti, and U. Sarkar, Philicity: a unified treatment of chemical reactivity and selectivity, J. Phys. Chem. A 107 (2003), pp. 4973-4975.
34. U. Sarkar, J. Padmanabhan, R. Parthasarathi, V. Subramanian, and P.K. Chattaraj, Toxicity analysis of polychlorinated dibenzofuranes through global and local electrophilicities, J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 758 (2006), pp. 119-125.
35. S. Arulmozhiraja and M. Morita, Structure-activity relationships for the toxicity of polychlorinated dibenzofuranes: approach through density functional theory-based descriptors, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 17 (2004), pp. 348-356.
36. P.A. Behnisch, K. Hosoe, and S.-I. Sakai, Brominated dioxin-like compounds: in vitro assessment in comparisons to classical dioxin-like compounds and other polyaromatic compounds, Environ. Int. 29 (2003), pp. 861-877.
37. Piskorska-Pliszcynska, B. Keys, S. Safe, and M.S. Newman, The cytosolic receptor binding affinities and AHH induction potencies of 29 polynuclear aromatic hydrodrocarbons, Toxicol. Lett. 34 (1986), pp. 67-74.
38. T. Puzyn, J. Falandysz, P.D. Jones, and J.P. Giesy, Quantitative structure activity relationships for the prediction of relative in vitro potencies (REPs) for chloronaphthalenes, J. Environ. Sci. Health 42 (2007), pp. 573-590.
39. S. Safe, S. Bandiera, T. Sawyer, B. Zmudzka, G. Mason, M. Romkes, M.A. Denomme, J. Sparling, A.B. Okey, and T. Fujita, Effects of structure on bidning to the 2,3,7,8-TCDD: receptor and AHH induction. Halogenated biphenuyls, Environ. Health Perspect. 61 (1985), pp. 21-33.
40. M.S. Denison, Unpublished results.
41. O. Mekenyan, D. Dimitrov, N. Nikolova, and S. Karabunarliev, Conformational Coverage by a Genetic Algorithm, Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 39 (1999), p. 997.
42. T. Pavlov, M. Todorov, R. Serafimova, H. Aladjov, and O. Mekenyan, Conformational coverage by a genetic algorithm: saturation of conformational space, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 47 (2007), pp. 851-863.
43. J. Steward, MOPAC: a semiempirical molecular orbital program, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 4 (1990), pp. 1-105.
44. J. Steward. MOPAC 93. Fujitsu Limited, 9-3, Nakase 1-Chome, Mihama-ku.Chiba-City, Chiba 261, Japan and Stewart Computational Chemistry, 15210 Paddington Circle, Colorado Springs, CO (1993).
45. O. Mekenyan, J.M. Ivanov, S. Karabunarliev, S. Bradbury, G. Ankley, and W. Karcher, A computationally-based hazard identification algorithm that incorporates ligand flexibility. 1. Identification of potential androgen receptor ligands, Environ. Sci. Technol. 31 (1997), pp. 3702-3711.
46. O. Mekenyan, N. Nikolova, S. Karabunarliev, S. Bardbury, G. Ankley, and B. Hansen, New developments in a hazard identification algorithm for hormone receptor ligands, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 18 (1999), pp. 139-153.
47. O.G. Mekenyan, N. Nikolova, P. Schmieder, and G.D. Veith, COREPA-M: a Multi-Dimensional Formulation of COREPA, QSAR Comb. Sc. 23 (2004), pp. 5-18.
48. S. Dimitrov, G. Dimitrova, T. Pavlov, N. Dimitrova, G. Patlewicz, J. Niemela, and O. Mekenyan, A Stepwise Approach for Defining the Applicability Domain of SAR and QSAR Models, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 45 (2005), pp. 839-849.
49. M. Procopio, A. Lahm, A. Tramontano, and L. Bonati, A model for recognition of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, Eur. J. Biochem. 269 (2002), pp. 13-18.
50. T. Gasiewicz, A.S. Kende, G. Rucci, B. Whitney, and J.J Willey, Analysis of structural requirements for Ah Receptor Antagonist Activity: Ellipticines, Flavones, and Related Compounds, Biochem. Pharmacol. 52 (1996), pp. 1787-1803.
51. E.C. Henry, A.S. Kende, G. Rucci, and M.J. Totleben, Flavone Antagonists Bind Competitively with 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-Dioxin (TCDD) to the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor But Inhibit Nuclear Uptake and Transformation, Mol. Pharmacol. 55 (1999), pp. 716-725.