Scholarly output: Print and digital - in teaching and research

Journal of Documentation

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 384-408

  Maynard, Sally ^a   O'Brien, Ann ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computer applications; Electronic journals; Intellectual property; Print media; Research; Teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951429418     PISSN: 00220418     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00220411011038467     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alexander, B. (2006), "Web 2.0: a new wave of innovation for teaching and learning?" in EDUCAUSE Review, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 32-44.
2. Allen, B. (2007), "Developing the best blend? From blended e-learning to blended learning" in Update, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 26-8.
3. Anderson, P. (2007), "What is web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education", JISC Technology & Standards Watch, available at: www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf (accessed 5 September 2008).
4. Armstrong, J. and Norton, B. (2007), "Use of research content in undergraduate teaching", unpublished report, JISC Scholarly Communications Group, Bristol.
5. Brabazon, T. (2007), The University of Google, Ashgate, Aldershot.
6. Brynko, B. (2008), "Research 2.0: the age of collaboration" in Information Today, Vol. 25, No. 8, p. 34.
7. CIBER (2008), "Information behaviour of the researcher of the future", CIBER Briefing Paper, available at: www.ucl.ac.uk/slais/research/ciber/downloads/ggexecutive.pdf (accessed 24 September, 2008).
8. Codone, S. (2004), "Reducing the distance: a study of course web sites as a means to create a total learning space in traditional courses" in IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 190-9.
9. Cohen, S.F. (2008), "Taking 2.0 to the faculty: why, who and how" in College & Research Libraries News, September, pp. 427-75.
10. Fearn, H. (2008), "Grappling with the digital divide" in Times Higher Education, 14 August, pp. 37-9.
11. Fraser, M. (2005), "Virtual research environments: overview and activity", Ariadne, Vol. 44, available at: www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue44/fraser/ (accessed 20 August 2009).
12. Glogoff, S. (2006), "The LTC Wiki - experiences with integrating a wiki in instruction", available at: www.wikiineducation.com/display/ikiw/The+LTC+Wiki+-+Experiences+with+Integrating+a+Wiki+in+Instruction (accessed 5 September 2008).
13. HESA (2007), Resources of Higher Education Institutions 2006/07, HESA, Cheltenham.
14. Housewright, R. and Schonfeld, R. (2006), Ithaka's Studies of Key Stakeholders in the Digital Transformation of Higher Education, Ithaka, New York, NY, 18 August 2008.
15. Ipsos MORI (2008), "Student expectation study (for JISC)", available at: www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/publications/studentexpectations (accessed 14 November 2008).
16. JISC (2007a), "Web 2.0 and social software: an introduction", JISC Briefing paper, available at: www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/publications/web2socialsoftwarev1.aspx (accessed 24 September 2008).
17. JISC (2007b), "In their own words: understanding the issues and benefits of social software", available at: www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearningpedagogy/iowpersonalsoftwarepdf.pdf (accessed 24 September 2008).
18. Kirkwood, A. and Price, L. (2007), "Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: what do we know about students' attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses?" in Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 257-74.
19. LASSIE (2008), "Social software, libraries and distance learners: final literature review", University of London. Centre for Distance Education, available at: clt.lse.ac.uk/Projects/LASSIE_lit_review_final.pdf (accessed 24 September 2008).
20. Marcum, D. and George, G. (2003), "Who uses what? Report on a National survey of information users in colleges and universities", D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 9, No. 10, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/october03/george/10george.html (accessed 5 September 2008).
21. Myhill, M., Shoebridge, M. and Snook, L. (2009), "Virtual research environments - a web 2.0 cookbook?" in Library Hi Tech, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 228-38.
22. NCeSS (2009), "Use and relevance of web 2.0 for researchers", available at: www.ncess.ac.uk/research/hub_research/useandresearchofweb2/ (accessed 19 August, 2009).
23. Nikam, K. and Rajenda, B.H. (2009), "Moving from script to science 2.0 for scholarly communication", Webology, Vol. 6, No. 1, available at: www.webology.ir/2009/v6n1/a68.html (accessed 18 August 2009).
24. Owen, M., Grant, L., Sayers, S. and Facer, K. (2006), Social Software and Learning, Futurelab, Bristol.
25. Phoebe Pedagogic Planner (2007), available at: phoebe-aconted.ox.ac.uk/ (accessed 5 September 2008).
26. Placing, K., Ward, M. and Teixeira, P. (2005) Placing, K. (Ed.), UniServe Science Blended Learning Symposium Proceedings in Science and Science Education, available at: science.uniserve.edu.au/pubs/procs/wshop10/ (accessed 5 September 2008).
27. Proctor, R. (2009), "Impact of web 2.0 on scholarly communication (slides). Workshop on scientific writing and new patterns of scientific communication", Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on e-Social Science, Cologne, 24 June 2009.
28. Robinson, L. (2007), "Impact of digital information resources in the toxicology literature" in Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 59, Nos 4/5, pp. 342-51.
29. Robson, D. (2008), "Personalising physics publishing with web 2.0. research information" in October-November, pp. 18-20.
30. Selwyn, N. (2009), "The digital native: myth and reality" in Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 364-79.
31. Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., Roberts, G. and Francis, R. (2006), The Undergraduate Experience of Blended E-Learning: A Review of UK Literature and Practice, Higher Education Academy, London.
32. Shirky, C. (2003), "Ontology is overrated: categories, links and tags", available at: www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html (accessed 5 September 2008).
33. Simmons, B. (2008), "Learning (2.0) to be a social library", Tennessee Libraries, Vol. 58, No. 2.
34. Skipper, M. (2006), "Would Mendel have been a blogger?" in Nature Reviews Genetics, Vol. 7, p. 664.
35. Smith, D. (2008), "A parallel universe? Blogs, wikis, web 2.0 and a complicated future for scholarly communication" in Serials, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 14-18.
36. Swan, A. (2006), "Overview of scholarly communication" in Jacobs, N. (Ed.), Open Access: Key Strategic, Technical and Economic Aspects, Chandos, London, pp. 5-14.
37. University of Oxford. Office of the Director of IT (2008), "Scoping digital repository services for research data management", available at: www.ict.ox.ac.uk/odit/projects/digitalrepository/docs/ScopingStudyInterviews-Workshop%20Findings.pdf (accessed 24 September 2008).
38. Wakeham, M. and Garfield, D. (2005), "Supporting both learning and research in a UK post-1992 university library: a case study" in Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 175-86.
39. Bates, M., Loddington, S., Manuel, S. and Oppenheim, C. (2007), "Attitudes to the rights and rewards for author contributions to repositories for teaching and learning" in Research in Learning Technology, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 67-82.