How costly is the Sarbanes Oxley Act? Evidence on the effects of the Act on corporate profitability

Journal of Corporate Finance

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 352-369

  Ahmed, Anwer S ^a   McAnally, Mary Lea ^a   Rasmussen, Stephanie ^b   Weaver, Connie D ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost of compliance; Net realized costs; Operating profitability; Sarbanes Oxley Act; Small firms

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951296545     PISSN: 09291199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2009.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Ahmed A.S. Accounting earnings and future economic rents. Journal of Accounting and Economics 1994, 17:377-400.
2. Albert L. Update on Convergence of Income Tax Accounting Standards FAS 109 and IAS 12. Alvarez and Marsal Tax Advisor Weekly 2008, vol. 34. (Aug 2008). Available at: http://www.alvarezandmarsal.com/newsletters/taw/taw2008-34.htm.
3. Asthana S., Balsam S., Kim S. The effect of Enron, Andersen, and Sarbanes-Oxley on the market for audit services. Accounting Research Journal 2009, 22(1):4-26.
4. Beasley M.S. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review 1996, 71(4):443-465.
5. Becker C.L., DeFond M.L., Jiambalvo J., Subramanyam K.R. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research 1998, 15(1):1-24.
6. Beneish D., Billings M., Hodder L. Internal control weaknesses and information uncertainty. The Accounting Review 2008, 83(3):665-703.
7. Bennedsen M., Perez-Gonzalez F., Wolfenzon D. Do CEOs matter?. Working Paper 2006, Copenhagen Business School, Available at SSRN: http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1293659.
8. Bhagat S., Bolton B.J. Sarbanes-Oxley, governance and performance. Working Paper 2009, University of Colorado at Boulder, Available at SSRN: http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1361815.
9. Block S.B. The latest movement to going private: an empirical study. Journal of Applied Finance 2004, 14(1):36-44.
10. Burks J. Disciplinary Measures in Response to Restatements after Sarbanes-Oxley. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 2009, 25:121-139.
11. Carney W.J. The costs of being public after Sarbanes-Oxley: the irony of 'going private'. Emory Law Journal 2006, 55(1):141-160.
12. Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 Costs and Implementation Issues: Survey Update 2005, Charles River and Associates International, http://www.crai.com/uploadedFiles/RELATING_MATERIALS/Publications/LAE/Competition_-_US/Files/Sarbanes-Oxley%20Section%20404%20Costs%20and%20Implementation%20Issues%20-%20Survey%20Update.pdf.
13. Chhaochharia V., Grinstein Y. Corporate governance and firm value: the impact of the 2002 governance rules. Journal of Finance 2007, 62(4):1789-1825.
14. Coates J.C. The goals and promise of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2007, 21(1):91-116.
15. Cohen D.A., Dey A., Lys T.Z. Trends in earnings management and informativeness of earnings announcements in the pre- and post-Sarbanes Oxley periods. Working Paper 2005, Northwestern University, Available at: http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=658782.
16. Cohen D.A., Dey A., Lys T.Z. Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre- and post-Sarbanes Oxley periods. The Accounting Review 2008, 83(3):757-787.
17. Coles J., Daniel N., Naveen L. Boards: does one size fit all?. Journal of Financial Economics 2008, 87(2):329-356.
18. Collins D., Masli A., Reitenga A., Sanchez J.M. Earnings restatements, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the disciplining of chief financial officers. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance 2009, 24(1):1-24.
19. D'Aquila J. Tallying the cost of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. CPA Journal 2004, 74:6-8.
20. De Franco G., Guan Y., Lu H. The wealth change and redistribution effects of Sarbanes-Oxley internal control disclosures. Working Paper 2005, University of Toronto, Available at: http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=706701.
21. Doidge C., Karolyi G.A., Lins K.V., Miller D.P., Stulz R.M. Private benefits of control, ownership, and the cross-listing decision. Journal of Finance 2009, 64(1):425-466.
22. Dunn C. Effective controls, clean opinions rule the roost. Compliance Week 2006, http://www.complianceweek.com/.
23. Dyck A., Zingales L. Private benefits of control: an international comparison. The Journal of Finance 2004, 59(2):537-600.
24. Eldridge S.W., Kealey B.T. SOX costs: auditor attestation under section 404. Working Paper 2005, University of Nebraska - Omaha, Available at: http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=743285.
25. Engel E., Hayes R.M., Wang X. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and firms' going-private decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 2007, 44(1-2):116-145.
26. Ettredge M.L., Li C., Scholz S. Audit fees and auditor dismissals in the Sarbanes-Oxley era. Accounting Horizons 2007, 21(4):371-386.
27. Fama E.F., French K.R. Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics 1997, 43(2):153-193.
28. Feltham G.A., Ohlson J.A. Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research 1995, 11(2):689-731.
29. FEI Survey: Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance Costs are Dropping; Average Compliance Costs are $3.8Million, Down 16% from Prior Year; Reductions about Half of What Were Anticipated 2006, Financial Executives Research Foundation, http://www.fei.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=74.
30. Gao F., Wu J.S., Zimmerman J.L. Unintended consequences of granting small firms exemptions from securities regulation: evidence from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Journal of Accounting Research 2009, 47(2):459-506.
31. Griffin P.A., Lont D.H. An analysis of audit fees following the passage of Sarbanes-Oxley. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics 2007, 14(2):161-192.
32. Hartman T.E. The High Cost of Compliance 2005, http://www.foley.com/publications/pub_detail.aspx?pubid=2849.
33. Hartman T.E. The Cost of Being Public in the Era of Sarbanes-Oxley 2006, http://www.knowledgeleader.com/KnowledgeLeader/Content.nsf/dce93ca8c1f384d6862571420036f06c/a007c05f46567f87882571c0008249ed/$FILE/Cost%20of%20Being%20Public%20-%202006.pdf.
34. Holmstrom B., Kaplan S.N. The state of US corporate governance: what's right and what's wrong. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 2003, 15:8-20.
35. Jain P.K., Rezaee Z. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and capital-market behavior: early evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research 2006, 23(3):629-654.
36. Jensen M.C. The modern industrial revolution, exit and failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance 1993, 48:831-880.
37. Karpoff J.M., Lee D.S., Martin G.S. The consequences to managers of financial misrepresentation. Journal of Financial Economics 2008, 88(2):193-215.
38. Khurana I.K., Raman K.K. Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of Big 4 versus non-Big 4 audits: evidence from Anglo-American countries. The Accounting Review 2004, 79(2):473-495.
39. Klein A. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 2002, 33(3):375-400.
40. Klein A., Marquardt C.A. Fundamentals of accounting losses. The Accounting Review 2006, 81(1):179-206.
41. Fraud Survey 2003, KPMG, Available at: http://www.kpmg.com/aci/surveys.asp#fraud03.
42. Lennox C., Pittman J.A. Big Five audits and accounting fraud. Working Paper 2008, Hong Kong University of Science & Technology.
43. Leuz C. Was the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 really this costly? A discussion of evidence from event returns and going-private decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 2007, 44(1-2):146-165.
44. Leuz C., Triantis A.J., Wang T.Y. Why do firms go dark? Causes and economic consequences of voluntary SEC deregistrations. Journal of Accounting and Economics 2008, 45(2-3):181-208.
45. Li H., Pincus M.P., Rego S.O. Market reaction to events surrounding the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and earnings management. Journal of Law and Economics 2008, 51:111-134.
46. Linck J.S., Netter J.M., Yang T. The determinants of board structure. Journal of Financial Economics 2008, 87(2):308-328.
47. Linck J.S., Netter J.M., Yang T. The effects and unintended consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and its era, on the supply and demand for directors. Review of Financial Studies 2009, 22(8):3287-3328.
48. Lindenberg E., Ross S. Tobin's q and industrial organization. Journal of Business 1981, 54(1):1-32.
49. Lipton M., Lorsch J. A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Business Lawyer 1992, 48(1):59-77.
50. Litvak K. The effect of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on non-US companies cross-listed in the US. Journal of Corporate Finance 2007, 13(2-3):195-228.
51. Mulherin J.H. Measuring the costs and benefits of regulation: conceptual issues in securities markets. Journal of Corporate Finance 2007, 13:421-437.
52. Myers S. Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics 1977, 5(2):147-175.
53. Penman S.H. Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation 2007, McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York, NY. 3 ed.
54. Petersen M.A. Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches. The Review of Financial Studies 2009, 22(1):435-480.
55. Ribstein L.E. Market vs. regulatory responses to corporate fraud: a critique of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Journal of Corporation Law 2002, 28(1):1-67.
56. Riedl E.J. An examination of long-lived asset impairments. The Accounting Review 2004, 79(3):823-852.
57. Romano R. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the making of quack corporate governance. The Yale Law Journal 2005, vol. 114:1521-1611.
58. Shleifer A., Vishny R.W. Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy 1986, 94(2):461-488.
59. Solomon D., Bryan-Low C. Companies complain about cost of corporate-governance rules. Wall Street Journal 2004, 1.
60. Stuart A. Sticker shock. CFO Magazine 2003, September 1.
61. Report to the committee on small business and entrepreneurship. U.S. Senate: Sarbanes-Oxley Act - Consideration of Key Principles Needed in Addressing Implementation for Smaller Public Companies 2006, United States Government Accountability Office, http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06361.pdf.
62. Wintoki M.B. Corporate boards and regulation: the effect of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the exchange listing requirements on firm value. Journal of Corporate Finance 2007, 13:229-250.
63. Zhang I.X. Economic consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Journal of Accounting and Economics 2007, 44(1-2):74-115.
64. Zhou J., Lobo G.J. Did conservatism in financial reporting increase after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act? Initial evidence. Accounting Horizons 2006, 20(1):57-73.