Did conservatism in financial reporting increase after the Sarbanes-Oxley act? initial evidence

Accounting Horizons

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 57-73

  Lobo, Gerald J ^a   Zhou, Jian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^b BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751558403     PISSN: 08887993     EISSN: 15587975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/acch.2006.20.1.57     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ayers, B., J. Jiang, and P. Yeung. 2005. Discretionary accruals and earnings management: An analysis of pseudo earnings targets. Working paper, University of Georgia.
2. Basu, S. 1997. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (1): 3-38.
3. Becker, C., M. DeFond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. R. Subramanyam. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15 (Spring): 1-24.
4. Beckett, P. 2002. New SEC order forces executives to swear by their numbers. Wall Street Journal (July 5).
5. Begley, J., and R. Freedman. 2004. The changing role of accounting numbers in public lending agreements. Accounting Horizons 18 (2): 81-96.
6. Benston, G. J. 1969. The effectiveness and effects of the SEC's accounting disclosure requirements. In Economic Policy and the Regulation of Corporate Securities, edited by H. G. Manne. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.
7. Browning, E. S. 2002. Dow Industrials give back nearly one-third of Friday's gain. Eastern edition. Wall Street Journal (July 9): C1.
8. Bumiller, E. 2002. Bush signs bill aimed at fraud in corporations. New York Times (July 31).
9. Burgstahler, D., and I. Dichev. 1997. Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (1): 99-126.
10. Coffee, J. 2003. What caused Enron? A capsule social and economic history of the 1990s. Working paper, Columbia Law School.
11. Cohen, D., A. Dey, and T. Lys. 2004. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: Implications for compensation structure and risk-taking incentives of CEOs. Working paper, Northwestern University.
12. _, _, and _. 2005. Trends in earnings management and informativeness of earnings announcements in the pre- and post-Sarbanes-Oxley periods. Working paper, Northwestern University.
13. Cunningham, L. 2003. The Sarbanes-Oxley yawn: Heavy rhetoric, light reform (and it might just work). Connecticut Law Review 35 (3): 915-989.
14. Dechow, P., R. Sloan, and A. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70 (April): 193-225.
15. DeFond, M., and J. Jiambalvo. 1994. Debt covenant effects and the manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17 (January): 145-176.
16. Dietrich, J., K. Muller, and E. Riedl. 2005. Asymmetric timeliness tests of accounting conservatism. Working paper, The Ohio State University.
17. DuCharme, L., P. Malatesta, and S. Sefcik. 2004. Earnings management, stock issues, and shareholder lawsuits. Journal of Financial Economics 71 (January): 27-49.
18. Givoly, D., and C. Hayn. 2000. The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: Has financial reporting become more conservative? Journal of Accounting and Economics 29 (3): 287-320.
19. Hagerman, R., and M. Zmijewski. 1979. Some economic determinants of accounting policy choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics (August): 141-161.
20. Heflin, F., and C. Hsu. 2004. The impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on the use of non-GAAP earnings measures. Working paper, Purdue University.
21. Hribar, P., and D. W. Collins. 2002. Errors in estimating accruals: Implications for empirical research. Journal of Accounting Research 40: 105-134.
22. Kasznik, R. 1999. On the association between voluntary disclosure and earnings management. Journal of Accounting Research 33: 353-367.
23. Kellogg, R. L. 1984. Accounting activities, security prices, and class action lawsuits. Journal of Accounting and Economics 6 (December): 185-204.
24. Perino, M. 2002. Enron's legislative aftermath: Some reflections on the deterrence aspects of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Working paper, Columbia University.
25. Protiviti, 2002. The changing corporate governance landscape and its implications. The Bulletin. Available at: http://www.protiviti.com/downloads/ PRO/pro-us/bulletins/vl_issue2.pdf.
26. Ribstein, L. E. 2002. Market vs. regulatory responses to corporate fraud: A critique of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Journal of Corporation Law 28 (1): 1-67.
27. Sweeney, A. 1994. Debt covenant violations and managers' accounting responses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17 (May): 281-308.
28. Teoh, S. H., I. Welch, and T. J. Wong. 1998. Earnings management and the underperformance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics 50: 63-99.
29. U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). 2002. Financial statement restatements: Trends, market impacts, regulatory responses, and remaining challenges. Available at: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03138.pdf.
30. U.S. House of Representatives. 2002. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Public Law 107-204 [H. R. 3763]. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
31. Watts, R. L. 1993. A proposal for research on conservatism. Presented at the American Accounting Association national meeting, San Francisco, CA. Working paper, University of Rochester.
32. _. 1977. Corporate financial statements, a product of the market and political processes. Australian Journal of Management 2 (April): 53-75.
33. _, and J. Zimmerman. 1978. Toward a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review 53 (January). 112-134.
34. _. 2003a. Conservatism in accounting, Part I: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons 17 (3): 207-221.
35. _. 2003b. Conservatism in accounting, Part II: Evidence and research opportunities. Accounting Horizons 17 (4): 287-301.