Quality assurance in higher education: The next 25 years

Quality in Higher Education

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 257-273

  Woodhouse, David ^a  

^a Academic Audit Unit   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951263169     PISSN: 13538322     EISSN: 14701081     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1353832980040306     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Academic Audit Unit (AAU). 1998. The University of Auckland Academic Audit Report, Wellington: AAU.
2. Akhlaghi, F., 1996. ‘A PFI marriage of convenience’. Times Higher Education Supplement, 19 April
3. Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation (APEC). 1997. APEC economic leaders declaration: connecting the APEC community, Vancouver: APEC.
4. Association or University Staff of New Zealand (AUSNZ). 1997. Submission on a Future Tertiary Education Policy for New Zealand, Wellington: AUSNZ.
5. Baldwin, G., 1997. ‘Quality assurance in Australian higher education: the case of Monash University’. Quality in Higher Education, 3 (1): 51–61.
6. Bouchard, T., ‘Human resource development and the quality imperative’. address to the Second Annual Conference of the Global Alliance for Transnational Education. Washington, DC.
7. Brennan, J., ‘Quality management, quality assessment and the decision-making process’. OECD/IMHE conference on Institutional responses to quality assessment. December4-6, Paris.
8. Brink, J., 3, December 1997. “ The South African national qualifications framework’ ”. In QA Policy & News Report 3, December, 10 The Center for Quality Assurance in International Education, VI
9. British Aerospace (BAe). 1998. ‘British Aerospace founds its virtual university’, Farnborough: BAe. Press release
10. Committee for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (CQAHE). 1994. Report on 1993 Quality Reviews, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
11. Committee for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (CQAHE). 1995a. Report on 1994 Quality Reviews, Volume I, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
12. Committee for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (CQAHE). 1995b. Report on 1995 Quality Reviews, Volume I, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
13. Committee for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (CQAHE). 1995c. A Report on Good Practice in Higher Education, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
14. Commonwealth Higher Education Management Service (CHEMS). 1997. Commonwealth University Management Benchmarking Club, London: CHEMS.
15. Cunningham, S., Tapsall, S., Ryan, Y., Stedman, L., Bagdon, K., and Flew, T., 1998. A Review of The Convergences Between Global Media Networks and Higher Education Provision, Canberra: DEETYA.
16. Davies, G.K., ‘American case study’. address to workshop on constructing national and institutional plans in higher education. Pretoria. Centre for Higher Education Transformation.
17. Dearing, R., 1996. Review of Qualifications for 16-19 Year Olds, London: School Curriculum and Assessment Authority.
18. Fave-Bonnet, M.-F., ‘Evaluation et auto-évaluation des universités en Europe’. présentation due projet EVALUE. September18-20, Grenoble. Colloque de l'Association pour le Développement des Méthodes d'Evaluation en Europe.
19. Global Alliance for Transnational Education (GATE). 1997. Certification Manual, Washington: GATE.
20. Gollan, P.J., 1997. Training and the bottom line’. The Quality Magazine, 6(5): 51–52.
21. Harman, G., and Meek, L.V., 1997. Higher Education Governance and Management: An Australian study, Canberra: DEETYA.
22. Harvey, L., and Knight, P.T., 1996. Transforming Higher Education, Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
23. Harvey, L., and Mason, S., 1995. The Role of Professional Bodies in Higher Education Quality Monitoring, Birmingham, UCE: Quality in Higher Education Project.
24. Haworth, K., 1998. ‘Lawmakers consider how best to provide more aid to distance-education students’. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 13 March 1998
25. Higher Education Council (HEC). 1996. Professional education and credentialism, Canberra: National Board of Employment, Education and Training.
26. Higher Education Council (HEC). 1997. Quality Implementation and Reporting in Australian Higher Education, Canberra: National Board of Employment, Education and Training.
27. Higher Education Quality Council (HEQC). 1996. Code of Practice for Overseas Collaborative Provision, second edition, London: HEQC.
28. Hillman, J., 1997. University for Industry, London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
29. International Network for Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education (INQAAHE). 1995. The Constitution, Utrecht: INQAAHE.
30. Johnston, R., ‘What are the directions of research in a global university?’. address to the international conference “The global university--a 21st century view”. Melbourne. RMIT.
31. Jones, G.R., Introductory address to the Second Annual Conference of the Global Alliance for Transnational Education. October8-11, Washington, DC.
32. Kable, D., 1997. ‘Quality system benchmarking study’. Quality Magazine, 6(5): 68–72.
33. Kiwicareers. 1998. Industry Organisations and Professional Bodies, Wellington: Career Services.
34. Kogan, M., 1986. Education Accountability, London: Hutchinson.
35. L'Ecuyer, J., The key issues’. address to the Second Annual Conference of the Global Alliance for Transnational Education. October8-11, Washington, DC.
36. Maassen, P.A.M., 1992. Effects of the ‘Evaluative State’ on Authority Distribution in Higher Education, Enschede: University of Twente, Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies.
37. McBurnie, G., The internationalization of higher education: the institutions respond. address to the Second Annual Conference of the Global Alliance for Transnational Education. October8-11, Washington, DC.
38. MacFarlane, A.G.J., Implications of Technology for higher education. address to the Council of the Society for Research in Higher Education. June191998, London.
39. McLuhan, M., 1968. War and Peace in the Global Village, New York: Bantam Books.
40. Mallea, J., ‘Cross-border trade in professional and educational services’. address to the Second Annual Conference of the Global Alliance for Transnational Education. October8-11, Washington, DC.
41. Mangan, K.S., 1998. ‘Managed care, the bane of many physicians, is a boon for business schools’. Chronicle of Higher Education, 1 May 1998
42. Mathias, H., 1995. African Education, part 2, Washington: Voice of America.
43. Milton, P., ‘Quality assurance in English higher education: an attempt to rationalise disparate systems’. address to the Fourth Biennial Conference of the International Network for Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education. May24-28, South Africa.
44. New Zealand Government. 1989. Learning for Life: Two, Wellington: Government Printing Office.
45. New Zealand Government. 1997a. A Future Qualifications Policy for New Zealand, Wellington: Ministry of Education.
46. New Zealand Government. 1997b. A Future Tertiary Education Policy for New Zealand, Wellington: Ministry of Education.
47. New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA). 1993. Guidelines, Criteria and Regulations for the Registration of Units and Qualifications for National Certificates and National Diplomas, Wellington: NZQA.
48. Noam, E., Opening address to the Second Annual Conference of the Global Alliance for Transnational Education. October8-11, Washington, DC.
49. Power, M., 1994. The Audit Explosion, London: Demos.
50. Rozsnyai, K., 1997. personal communication, Budapest: Hungarian Accreditation Committee.
51. Schick, A., 1996. The Spirit of Reform, Wellington: State Services Commission.
52. Sheldrake, P., ‘What are the management issues for a global university?’. address to the international conference The global university--a 21st century view’. Melbourne. RMIT.
53. Smithers, A., 1997. The New Zealand Qualifications Framework, Wellington: Education Forum.
54. South African Government. 1996. Lifelong Learning, Through a National Qualifications Framework, Pretoria: Department of Education.
55. Stanley, G., ‘National and international quality frameworks’. address to regional conference on higher education: ‘National Strategies and Regional Co-operation for the 21st Century’. July8-11, Tokyo. UNESCO.
56. Swain, H., 1998. ‘Review by Net mooted’. Times Higher Education Supplement, 27 May 1998
57. Trachtenberg, S.J., 1996. ‘Accreditation costs and benefits: are the former outrunning the latter?’. Critical Issues in Higher Education, VI: 5–12. Selected Commentaries 1995-96
58. UNESCO. 1995. Policy Paper for Change and Development in Higher Education, Paris: UNESCO.
59. University of Melbourne. 1997. ‘Universitas 21’. University of Melbourne Gazette, July: 23
60. Vroeijenstijn, A.I., 1995. Improvement and Accountability, London: Jessica Kingsley.
61. West, R., 1997. Learning for Life: Review of higher education financing and policy: a policy discussion paper, Canberra: DEETYA.
62. West, R., 1998. Higher Education Review: Final report, Canberra: DEETYA.
63. Wojtas, O., 1998. ‘Assessments “destroy” higher education’. Times Higher Education Supplement, 22 May 1998
64. Woodhouse, D., ‘Quality assurance in international higher education’. Address to New Zealand Education International Ltd Annual Conference. March19-21, Wellington.
65. Woodhouse, D., ‘Now what? The second (and subsequent) cycle of external quality review’. address to the Fourth Biennial conference of the International Network for Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education. South Africa.
66. Woodhouse, D., and Middlehurst, R., 1996. ‘Coherent systems for external quality assurance’. Quality in Higher Education, 1 (3): 257–68.