How similar are national red lists and the IUCN Red List?

Biological Conservation

Volumn 143, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1154-1158

  Brito, Daniel ^a,b   Ambal, Ruth Grace ^c   Brooks, Thomas ^d   Silva, Naamal De ^d   Foster, Matthew ^d   Hao, Wang ^e   Hilton Taylor, Craig ^f   Paglia, Adriano ^g   Rodríguez, Jon Paul ^h   Rodríguez, José Vicente ⁱ  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF GOIÁS   (Brazil)

^b DEPARTAMENTO DE CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS   (Brazil)

^c University of the Philippines Diliman   (Philippines)

^d Betty and Gordon Moore Center for Science and Oceans   (United States)

^e PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^f IUCN Species Programme   (United Kingdom)

^g Conservação Internacional Brasil ^*  (Brazil)

^h INSTITUTO VENEZOLANO DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTÍFICAS   (Venezuela)

ⁱ Conservation International CBC Andes Cra 13 No 71 41 ^*  (Colombia)

Author keywords

Conservation planning; Conservation priorities; IUCN; Red lists; Risk assessment; Scale

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSERVATION PLANNING; ENDANGERED SPECIES; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION; PRIORITIZATION; RED LIST; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 77951257002     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.02.015     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Akçakaya H.R., Ferson S., Burgman M.A., Keith D.A., Mace G.M., and Todd C.R. Making consistent IUCN classifications under uncertainty. Conservation Biology 14 (2000) 1001-1013
2. Becker C.G., and Loyola R.L. Extinction risk assessments at the population and species level: implications for amphibian conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 17 (2008) 2297-2304
3. Burton J.A. The context of Red Data Books, with a complete bibliography of the IUCN publications. In: de Iongh H.H., Bánki O.S., Bergmans W., and van der Werff ten Bosch M.J. (Eds). The Harmonization of Red lists for Threatened Species in Europe (2003), The Netherlands Commission for International Protection, Leiden 291-300
4. de Grammont P.C., and Cuarón A.D. An evaluation of threatened species categorization systems used on the American continent. Conservation Biology 20 (2006) 14-27
5. de Iongh H.H., and Bal D. Harmonization of red lists in Europe: some lessons learned in the Netherlands when applying the new IUCN Red list Categories and Criteria version 3.1. Endangered Species Research 3 (2007) 53-60
6. Eaton M.A., Gregory R.D., Noble D.G., Robinson J.A., Hughes J., Procter D., Brown A.F., and Gibbons D.W. Regional IUCN red listing: the process as applied to birds in the United Kingdom. Conservation Biology 19 (2005) 1557-1570
7. Garcia F.I., and Marini M.A. Comparative study between the global, national and state lists of threatened birds in Brazil. Natureza & Conservação 4 (2006) 138-163
8. Gärdenfors U. Classifying threatened species at the national versus global levels. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16 (2001) 511-516
9. Gärdenfors U., Hilton-Taylor C., Mace G.M., and Rodríguez J.P. The application of IUCN Red list criteria at regional levels. Conservation Biology 15 (2001) 1206-1212
10. Grigera D., and Ubeda C. Una revisión de los trabajos sobre categorizaciones y prioridades de conservación de los vertebrados de Argentina. Ecología Austral 12 (2002) 163-174
11. Hilton-Taylor C., Mace G.M., Capper D.R., Collar N.J., Stuart S.N., Bibby C.J., Pollock C., and Thomsen J.B. Assessment mismatches must be sorted out: they leave species at risk. Nature 404 (2000) 541
12. IUCN, 1994. IUCN Red List Categories. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland.
13. IUCN, 2001. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria, Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland.
14. IUCN, 2003. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red list Criteria at Regional Levels: Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland.
15. IUCN, 2008. 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. .
16. Keller V., and Bollmann K. From red lists to species of conservation concern. Conservation Biology 18 (2004) 1636-1644
17. Mace G.M., and Collar N.J. Extinction risk assessment for birds through quantitative criteria. Ibis 137 s1 (1995) 240-246
18. Mace G.M., and Lande R. Assessing extinction threats: toward a revaluation of IUCN threatened species categories. Conservation Biology 5 (1991) 148-157
19. Master L.L. Assessing threats and setting priorities for conservation. Conservation Biology 5 (1991) 559-563
20. Miller R.M., Rodríguez J.P., Aniskowicz-Fowler T., Bambaradeniya C., Boles R., Eaton M.A., Gärdenfors U., Keller V., Molur S., Walker S., and Pollock C. Extinction risk and conservation priorities. Science 313 (2006) 441
21. Miller R.M., Rodríguez J.P., Aniskowicz-Fowler T., Bambaradeniya C., Boles R., Eaton M.A., Gärdenfors U., Keller V., Molur S., Walker S., and Pollock C. National threatened species listing base on IUCN criteria and regional guidelines: current status and future perspectives. Conservation Biology 21 (2007) 684-696
22. Milner-Gulland E.J., Kreuzberg-Mukhina E., Grebot B., Ling S., Bykova E., Abdusalamov I., Bekenov A., Gärdenfors U., Hilton-Taylor C., Salnikov V., and Stogova L. Application of IUCN red listing criteria at the regional and national levels: a case study from central Asia. Biodiversity and Conservation 15 (2006) 1873-1886
23. Possingham H.P., Andelman S.J., Burgman M.A., Medellín R.A., Master L.L., and Keith D.A. Limits to the use of threatened species lists. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17 (2002) 503-507
24. Rodrigues A.S.L., Pilgrim J.D., Lamoreux J.F., Hoffmann M., and Brooks T.M. The value of the IUCN Red list for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21 (2006) 71-76
25. Rodríguez J.P., Ashenfelter G., Rojas-Suárez F., García-Fernández J.J., Suárez L., and Dobson A.P. Local data are vital to worldwide conservation. Nature 403 (2000) 241
26. Schnittler M., and Günther K.F. Central European vascular plants requiring priority conservation measures: an analysis from national red lists and distribution maps. Biodiversity and Conservation 8 (1999) 891-925
27. Thissen J.B.M., Bal D., de Iongh H., and van Strien A.J. The 2006 national Red list of mammals of the Netherlands and a IUCN regional Red list. Lutra 52 (2009) 23-35
28. von May R., Catenazzi A., Angulo A., Brown J.L., Carrillo J., Chávez G., Córdova J.H., Curo A., Delgado A., Enciso M.A., Gutiérrez R., Lehr E., Martínez J.L., Medina-Muller M., Miranda A., Neira D.R., Ochoa J.A., Quiroz A.J., Rodríguez D.A., Rodríguez L.O., Salas A.W., Seimon T., Seimon A., Siu-Ting K., Suárez J., Torres C., and Twomey E. Current state of conservation knowledge on threatened amphibian species in Peru. Tropical Conservation Science 1 (2008) 397-416