Extinction risk and conservation priorities [4]

Science

Volumn 313, Issue 5786, 2006, Pages 441-

  Miller, Rebecca M ^a   Rodriguez, Jon Paul ^a,b   Aniskowicz Fowler, Theresa ^c   Bambaradeniya, Channa ^d   Boles, Ruben ^c   Eaton, Mark A ^e   Gärdenfors, Ulf ^f   Keller, Verena ^g   Molur, Sanjay ^h   Walker, Sally ^h   Pollock, Caroline ⁱ  

^a INSTITUTO VENEZOLANO DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTÍFICAS   (Venezuela)

^b Provita   (Venezuela)

^c ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

^d IUCN   (Sri Lanka)

^e RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE   (United Kingdom)

^f Box 7007   (Sweden)

^g SWISS ORNITHOLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

^h Zoo Outreach Organisation   (India)

ⁱ IUCN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENDANGERED SPECIES; GOVERNMENT; LETTER; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPECIES CONSERVATION; SPECIES EXTINCTION;

ANIMALS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 33746645148     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (10)

1. G. M. Mace, R. Lande, Conserv. Biol. 5, 148 (1991).
2. IUCN, Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional Levels: Version 3.0 (IUCN Species Survival Commission, World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK, 2003).
3. F. Pinchera, L. Boitani, F. Corsi, Biodivers. Conserv. 6, 959 (1997).
4. M. A. Eaton et al., Conserv. Biol. 19, 1557 (2005).
5. M. Avery et al., Ibis 137, 5232 (1995).
6. V. Keller, K. Bollmann, Conserv. Biol. 18, 1636 (2004).
7. U. Gärdenfors, Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 511 (2001).
8. R. D. Gregory et al., Br. Birds 95, 410 (2002).
9. J. P. Rodríguez, F. Rojas-Suárez, C. J. Sharpe, Oryx 38, 373 (2004).
10. R. Miller et al., Report from the National Red List Advisory Group Workshop "Analysis of the Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at a National Level" (World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland, 2005) (available at www.iucn.org/themes/ssc/red-lists.htm).