Matching to sufficient treatment: Some characteristics of undertreated (Mismatched) clients

Journal of Addictive Diseases

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 59-67

  De Leon, George ^a   Melnick, Gerald ^a   Cleland, Charles M ^b  

^a NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH INSTITUTES   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Client treatment matching; Undertreatment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DRUG USE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICATION THERAPY MANAGEMENT; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RISK; SOCIAL PROBLEM; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOLLOW UP; OUTPATIENT; PSYCHOLOGY; RESIDENTIAL CARE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MOTIVATION; OUTPATIENTS; RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77951223469     PISSN: 10550887     EISSN: 15450848     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10550880903436051     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Budde D, Rounsaville BJ, Bryant KJ. Inpatient and outpatient cocaine abusers: clinical comparisons at intake and one-year follow-up. J Subst Abuse Treat 1992; 9: 337-342 (Pubitemid 23052631)
2. Klein C, di Menza S, Arfken C, Schuster CR. Interaction effects of treatment setting and client characteristics on retention and completion. J Psych Drugs 2002; 34: 39-50. (Pubitemid 34297703)
3. Magura S, Staines G, Kosanke N, Rosenblum A, Foote J, DeLuca A, Bali P. Predictive validity of the ASAM patient placement criteria for naturalistically matched vs. mismatched alcoholism patients. Am J Addict 2003; 12:386-397 (Pubitemid 37449025)
4. McKay JR, Donovan DM, McLellan T, Krupski A, Hansten M, Stark KD, GearyK, Cecere J. Evaluation of full vs. partial continuum of care in the treatment of publicly funded substance abusers in Washington State. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2002; 28:307-338 (Pubitemid 34457061)
5. Melnick G, De Leon G, Thomas G, Kressel D. A client-treatment matching protocol for therapeutic communities: first report. J Subst Abuse Treat 2001; 21:119-128 (Pubitemid 33109060)
6. Rychtarik RG, Connors GJ, Whitney RB, McGillicuddy NB, Fitterling JM,Wirtz PW. Treatment settings for persons with alcoholism: vidence for matching clients to inpatient versus outpatient care. J Cons Clin Psychol 2000; 68:277-289
7. Thornton CC, Tottheil E, Weinstein SP, Kerachsky RS. Patient-treatment matching in substance abuse: drug addiction severity. J Subst Abuse Treat 1998; 15: 505-511
8. McKay JR, Cacciola JS, McLellan T, Alterman A, Wirtz PW. An initial evaluation of the psychosocial dimensions of the American Society of Addiction Medicine criteria for inpatient versus intensive outpatient substance abuse rehabilitation. J Stud Alcohol 1997; 58: 239-252 (Pubitemid 27176088)
9. Moyer A, Finney JW, Elworth JT, Kraemer HC. Can methodological features account for patient-treatment matching findings in the alcohol field? J Stud Alcohol 2001; 62:62-73. (Pubitemid 32154217)
10. ProjectMATCH. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: ProjectMATCH post treatment drinking outcomes. J Stud Alcohol 1997; 58(1):7-29.
11. ProjectMATCH. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH three-year drinking outcomes. Alcohol Clin Exp Research 1998; 22(1):300-311
12. Gastfriend DR, Lu S, Sharon E. Placement matching: challenge and technical progress. Subst Use Misuse 2000; 35:2191-2213 (Pubitemid 32004741)
13. McKay JR, Cacciola JS, McLellan T, Alterman A, Wirtz PW. An initial evaluation of the psychosocial dimensions of the American Society of Addiction Medicine criteria for inpatient versus intensive outpatient substance abuse rehabilitation. J Stud Alcohol 1997; 58:239-252 (Pubitemid 27176088)
14. Chen S, Barnett GG, Sempel JM, Timko C. Outcomes and costs ofmatching the intensity of dual-diagnosis treatment to patient's symptom severity. J Subst Abuse Treat 2006; 31:95-105. (Pubitemid 43928420)
15. Fiorentine R, Anglin MD. More is better: counseling participation and the effectiveness of outpatient drug treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat 1996; 13:341-348 (Pubitemid 27146576)
16. Friedmann PD, Hendrickson JC, Gerstein DR, Zhang Z. The effect of matching comprehensive services to patients' needs on drug use improvement in addiction treatment. Addiction 2004; 99:962-972 (Pubitemid 39452808)
17. Hoffman JA, Caudill BD, Koman JJ III, Luckey JW, Flynn PM, Mayo DW. Psychosocial treatments for cocaine abuse. J Subst Abuse Treat 1996; 13:3-11.
18. Rawson RA, Shoptaw SJ, Obert JL, McCann MJ, Hasson AL, Marinelli-Casey PJ, Brethen PR, Ling W. An intensive outpatient approach for cocaine abuse treatment: the matrix model. J Subst Abuse Treat 1995; 12:117-127
19. Simpson DD, Joe GW, Fletcher BW, Hubbard RL, Anglin MD. A national evaluation of treatment outcomes for cocaine dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999; 56:510-514
20. Timko S, Sempel JM. Short-term outcomes of matching dual diagnosis patients' symptom severity to treatment intensity. J Subst Abuse Treat 2004; 26:209-218
21. Magura S, Fong C, Staines G, Cleland, C, Foote J, Rosenblum A, Kosanke N, DeLuca A. The combined effects of treatment intensity, self-help groups and patient attributes on drinking outcomes. J Psych Drugs 2005; 37: 85-92. (Pubitemid 40569809)
22. De Leon G, Melnick G, Cleland C. Client matching: a severity-treatment intensity paradigm. J Addict Dis 2008; 27:99-113.
23. Flynn PM, Craddock SG, Hubbard RL, Anderson J, Etheridge RM. Methodological overview and research design for the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol Addict Behav 1997; 11:230-243 (Pubitemid 28046587)
24. Etheridge RM, Hubbard RL, Anderson J, Craddock SG, Flynn PM. Treatment structure and program services in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol Addict Behav 1997; 11:244-260 (Pubitemid 28046588)
25. De Leon G, Melnick G, Kressel D, Jainchill N. Circumstances, motivation, readiness and suitability (the CMRS scales): predicting retention in therapeutic community treatment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1994; 20:495-515. (Pubitemid 24337581)