Client matching: A severity-treatment intensity paradigm

Journal of Addictive Diseases

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 99-113

  De Leon, George ^a   Melnick, Gerald ^a   Cleland, Charles M ^a  

^a NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH INSTITUTES   (United States)

Author keywords

Client matching; Drug use severity; Severity; Treatment intensity

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; AMPHETAMINE; CANNABIS; COCAINE; DIAMORPHINE; METHADONE; NARCOTIC AGENT; OPIATE; PSYCHOSTIMULANT AGENT; SEDATIVE AGENT; TRANQUILIZER; STREET DRUG;

ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CANNABIS ADDICTION; COCAINE DEPENDENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRIME; CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRUG DEPENDENCE; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; DRUG WITHDRAWAL; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEROIN DEPENDENCE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MOTIVATION; NARCOTIC DEPENDENCE; OPIATE ADDICTION; OUTPATIENT CARE; RATING SCALE; RESIDENTIAL CARE; SOCIAL ASPECT; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDITY; ADDICTION; AMBULATORY CARE; CLASSIFICATION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; LONG TERM CARE; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT REFERRAL; PROGNOSIS; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; AMBULATORY CARE; COCAINE-RELATED DISORDERS; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HEROIN DEPENDENCE; HUMANS; LONG-TERM CARE; MALE; MARIJUANA ABUSE; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROGNOSIS; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; STREET DRUGS; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 58149151274     PISSN: 10550887     EISSN: 15450848     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10550880802122703     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. McLellan AT, Grissom GR, Zanis D, Randall M. Problem-service "matching" in addiction treatment: a prospective study in 4 programs. Arch Gen Psychiat. 1997;54(8):730-5.
2. Hser YI, Polinsky ML, Maglione M, Anglin MD. Matching clients' needs with drug treatment services. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1999;16:299-305.
3. Project MATCH. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. J Stud Alcohol.1997;58(1):7-29.
4. Project MATCH. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH three-year drinking outcomes. Alcoholism, Clin Exp Research. 1998;22(6):1300-11.
5. Thornton CC, Tottheil E, Weinstein SP, Kerachsky RS. Patient-treatment matching in substance abuse: Drug addiction severity. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1998;15(6): 505-11.
6. Budde D, Rounsaville BJ, Bryant KJ. In patient and outpatient cocaine abusers: linical comparisons at intake and one-year follow-up. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1992;9(4):337-42.
7. Klein C, di Menza S, Arfken C, Schuster CR. Interaction effects of treatment setting and client characteristics on retention and completion. J Psych Drugs. 2002;34(1):39-50.
8. Rychtarik RG, Connors GJ, Whitney RB, McGillicuddy NB, Fitterling JM, Wirtz PW. Treatment settings for persons with alcoholism: vidence for matching clients to inpatient versus outpatient care. J Cons Clin Psychol. 2000;68(2):277-89.
9. Simpson DD, Joe GW, Fletcher BW, Hubbard RL, Anglin MD. A national evaluation of treatment outcomes for cocaine dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56:510-14.
10. Falkin GP, Strauss S, Bohen T. Matching drug-involved probationers to appropriate drug interventions. Federal Probation. 1999;63(1):3-8.
11. Hoffmann N, Halikas J, Mee-Lee D, Weedman RD. American Society of Addiction Medicine Patient Placement Criteria for the treatment of psychoactive substance use disorders. Washington, DC: ASAM, 1991.
12. Gastfriend DR, McLellan AT. Treatment matching. Theoretic basis and practical implications. Med Clin North Am. 1997;81(4):945-66.
13. Turner WM, Turner KH, Reif S, Gutowski WE, Gastfriend DR. Feasibility of multidimensional substance abuse treatment matching: Automating the ASAM Patient Placement Criteria Drug Alcohol Depend. 1999;55(1-2):35-43.
14. McKay JR, Cacciola JS, McLellan T, Alterman A, Wirtz PW. An initial evaluation of the psychosocial dimensions of the American Society of Addiction Medicine criteria for inpatient versus intensive outpatient substance abuse rehabilitation. J Stud Alcohol. 1997;58:239-52.
15. Magura S, Staines G, Kosanke N, Rosenblum A, Foote J, DeLuca A, Bali P. Predictive validity of the ASAM patient placement criteria for naturalistically matched vs. mismatched alcoholism patients. Am J Addict. 2003;12:386-97.
16. McKay JR, Donovan DM, McLellan T, Krupski A, Hansten M, Stark KD, Geary K, Cecere J. Evaluation of full vs. partial continuum of care in the treatment of publicly funded substance abusers in Washington State. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2002;28(2):307-38.
17. Melnick G, De Leon G, Thomas G, Kressel D. A client-treatment matching protocol for therapeutic communities: first report. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2001;21:119-28.
18. Moyer A, Finney JW, Elworth JT, Kraemer HC. Can methodological features account for patient-treatment matching findings in the alcohol field? J Stud Alcohol. 2001;62(1):62-73.
19. Gastfriend DR, Lu S, Sharon E. Placement matching: Challenge and technical progress. Subst Use Misuse. 2000;35(12-14):2191-213.
20. Magura S, Fong C, Staines G, Cleland C, Foote J, Rosenblum A, Kosanke N, DeLuca A. The combined effects of treatment intensity, self-help groups and patient attributes on drinking outcomes. J Psych Drugs. 2005;37(1):85-92.
21. Chen S, Barnett GG, Sempel JM, Timko C. Outcomes and costs of matching the intensity of dual-diagnosis treatment to patient's symptom severity. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006;31(1):95-105.
22. Fiorentine R, Anglin MD. More is better: Counseling participation and the effectiveness of outpatient drug treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1996;13(4):341-48.
23. Friedmann PD, Hendrickson JC, Gerstein DR, Zhang Z. The effect of matching comprehensive services to patients' needs on drug use improvement in addiction treatment. Addiction. 2004;99(8):962-972.
24. Hoffman JA, Caudill BD, Koman III JJ, Luckey JW, Flynn PM, Mayo DW. Psychosocial treatments for cocaine abuse. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1996;13(1):3-11.
25. Rawson RA, Shoptaw SJ, Obert JL, McCann MJ, Hasson AL, Marinelli-Casey PJ, Brethen PR, Ling W. An intensive outpatient approach for cocaine abuse treatment. The matrix model. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1995;12(2): 117-27.
26. Timko S, Sempel JM. Short-term outcomes of matching dual diagnosis patients' symptom severity to treatment intensity. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2004;26(3): 209-18.
27. De Leon G. The therapeutic community: study of effectiveness. NIDA Treatment Research Monograph Series (DHHS Publication No. ADM-84-1286). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1984.
28. Simpson DD, Joe GW, Brown BS. Treatment retention and follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Outcome Treatment Study (DATOS). Psychol Addict Behav. 1997;11(4):294-307.
29. Flynn PM, Craddock SG, Hubbard RL, Anderson J, Etheridge RM. Methodological overview and research design for the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol Addict Behav. 1997;11(4):230-43.
30. Etheridge RM, Hubbard RL, Anderson J, Craddock SG, Flynn PM. Treatment structure and program services in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol Addict Behav. 1997;11(4):244-60.
31. De Leon G, Melnick G, Kressel D, Jainchill N. Circumstances, motivation, readiness and suitability (the CMRS scales): Predicting retention in therapeutic community treatment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1994;20(4):495-515.
32. Chinn S. A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2000;19(22):3127-31.
33. De Leon G. The illusion of control groups in therapeutic community research. Presented at: the 12th Annual Eagleville Conference. May 1979; Eagleville, PA .
34. De Leon G, Inciardi JA, Martin SS. Residential drug abuse treatment research: Are conventional control designs appropriate for assessing treatment effectiveness? J Psych Drugs. 1995;27(1):85-91.