Pedagogical design for an online information literacy course: College students' learning experience with multimodal objects

Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science

Volumn 33, Issue 1-2, 2009, Pages 1-37

  Chen, Hsin Liang ^a   Williams, James Patrick ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951189664     PISSN: 1195096X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Agre, Philip. 2002. Infrastructure and institutional change in the networked university. In Dutton and Loader 2002, 152-166
2. Armstrong, Lloyd. 2002. A new game in town: Competitive higher education in American research universities. In Dutton and Loader 2002, 87-115.
3. Benson, Denzel, Tracy Ore, Wava Henry, Caroline Persell, Aileen Schulte, James Steele, and Idee Winfield. 2002. Digital technologies and scholarship of teaching and learning in sociology. Teaching Sociology 30: 140-157
4. Bills, David, and Anthony Stanley. 2001. Social science computer labs as sites for teaching and learning: Challenges and solutions in their design and maintenance. Teaching Sociology 29: 153-162 (Pubitemid 33258579)
5. Boehner, Kirsten, Geri Gay, and Claire Larkin. 2005. Drawing evaluation into design for mobile computing: A case study of the Renwick Gallery's handheld education project. International Journal on Digital Libraries 5 (2): 219-230
6. Bork, Alfred. 2002. Distance learning through highly-interactive tutorials. In Dutton and Loader 2002, 128-134
7. Bouhnik, Dan, and Tali Marcus. 2006. Interaction in distance-learning courses. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (3): 299-305.
8. Boyd-Barrett, Oliver. 2002. Distance education provision by universities: How intuitional contexts affect choices. In Dutton and Loader 2002, 185-205.
9. Bruce, Bertram, Heather Dowd, Darin Eastburn, and Cleora D'Arcy. 2005. Plants, pathogens, and people: Extending the classroom to the Web. Teachers College Record 107(8): 1730-1753
10. Chen, Gongxiang, and Xiaolan Fu. 2003. Effects of multimodal information on learning performance and judgment of learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research 29 (3): 349-362 (Pubitemid 38483810)
11. Chen, Hsin-liang, and James P. Williams. 2009. Pedagogical design for an online information literacy course: College students' learning experience with multi-modal objects. Canadian Journal of Library and Information Science 35 (1 ): 14-24.
12. Dutton, John, Marilyn Dutton, and Jo Perry. 2002. How do online students differ from lecture students? Journal of Management Information Systems 18 (4): 16990.
13. Dutton, William, and Brian Loader, eds. 2002. Digital academe: The new media and institutions of higher education and learning. London: Routledge.
14. Eastin, Matthew S., and Robert LaRose. 2000. Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 6(1), http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issuel/eastin.html.
15. Gay, Geri, and Helene Hembrooke. 2004. Activity-centered design: An ecological approach to designing smart tools and usable systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Gifford, Bernard. R., and Noel D. Enyedy. 1999. Activity-centered design: Towards a theoretical framework for CSCL. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm? id= 1150262&dl=ACM&coll=ACM&CFID1257393&CFTOKEN=70134979.
17. Hara, Noriko, and Robert Kling. 2002. Students' difficulties in a Web-based distance education course: An ethnographic study. In Dutton and Loader 2002, 62-84.
18. Hazemi, Reza, and Stephen Hailes, eds. 2002. The digital university: Building a learning community. London: Springer.
19. Joo, Young-Ju, Mimi Bong, and Ha-Jeen Choi. 2000. Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in Web-based instruction. Educational Research and Development 48: 5-17.
20. Kiernan, Vincent. 2005, February 18. Colleges' spending on technology will decline again this year, survey suggests. Chronicle of Higher Education 51 (24): A34.
21. Koeber, Charles. 2005. Introducing multimedia presentations and a course website to an introductory sociology course: How technology affects student perceptions of teaching effectiveness. Teaching Sociology 33: 285-300.
22. Lievrouw, Leah A., and Sonia Livingstone, eds. 2006. The handbook of new media. Updated student ed. London: Sage.
23. Mayer, Richard. E. Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
24. McMillan, Sally J. 2006. Exploring models of interactivity from multiple research traditions: Users, documents and systems. In The handbook of new media, ed. L.A. Lievrouw and S. Livingstone, 205-229 Updated student ed. London: Sage.
25. Pippert, Timothy, and Helen Moore. 1999. Multiple perspectives on multimedia in the large lecture. Teaching Sociology 27: 92-109.
26. Reimann, Peter. 1999. The role of external representations in distributed problem solving. Learning and Instruction 9 (4): 411-418
27. Rogers, Yvonne. 1999. What is different about interactive graphical representations? Learning and Instruction 9 (4): 419-425
28. Rouet, Jean-François, Jarmo Levonen, and Agnes Biardeau, eds. 2001. Multimedia learning: Cognitive and instructional issues. New York: Pergamon.
29. Sims, Rod. 2003. Promises of interactivity: Aligning learner perceptions and expectations with strategies for flexible and online learning. Distance Education 24 (1): 87-103.
30. Spitzberg, Brian. 2006. Preliminary development of a model and measure of computer-mediated communication (CMC) competence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11 (2): 629-666
31. Steeples, Christine, and Chris Jones, eds. 2002. Networked learning: Perspectives and issues. London: Springer.
32. Swam, Karen. 2001. Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education 22 (2): 306-331
33. Thompson, Lori, and Brain Lynch. 2003. Web-based instruction: Who is inclined to resist it and why? Journal of Educational Computing Research 29 (3): 375-385
34. Trible, Paul. 2005, July 15. Colleges must get used to collaborating with congress. Chronicle of Higher Education 51 (45) : B16.
35. University of Texas School of Information. 2008. Undergraduate minor in information studies, http://www.ischool.utexas.edu/programs/minor.php.
36. Williams, James P., and Hsin-liang Chen. 2008. Computer-mediated communication and multi-modal instruction in higher education. In Handbook of research on computer mediated communication, ed. S. Kelsey and K. St. Amant, 128-145 Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
37. Williams, James P., Shawn Q. Stewart, Lori Eichelberger, Carlos Ovalle, Kayla Jackson, Sam Burns, and Holly Robertson. 2005. Scaling information in cyberspace: A framework for developing online instruction to meet the demands of large classes. Austin, TX: Educause Southwest.