Predicting gender awareness: The relevance of neo-sexism

Journal of Gender Studies

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-12

  Martínez, Carmen ^a   Paterna, Consuelo ^a   Roux, Patricia ^b   Falomir, Juan Manuel ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Gender awareness; Gender inequality; Gender roles; Men; Neo sexism; Women

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951154401     PISSN: 09589236     EISSN: 14653869     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09589230903057142     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ashe, F., 2004. Deconstructing the experiential bar. Male experience and feminist resistance. Men and masculinities, 7 (2), 87-204.
2. Bargard, A. and Hyde, J., 1991. A study of feminist identity development in women. Psychology of women quarterly, 15 (2), 181-201.
3. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A., 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51 (6), 1173-1182.
4. Biddle, S.J., 1979. Role theory: expectancies, identities, and behaviors. New York: Academic Press.
5. Burn, S., Aboud, R., and Moyles, C., 2000. The relationships between gender social identity and support for feminism. Sex roles, 42 (9/10), 1081-1089.
6. Butler, J., 1990. Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
7. Campbell, B., Schellenberg, E.G., and Senn, C.Y., 1997. Evaluating measures of contemporary sexism. Psychology of women quarterly, 21 (1), 89-101.
8. Connell, R.W., 1987. Gender and power: society, the person and sexual politics. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
9. Cowan, G., Mestlin, M., and Masek, J., 1992. Predictors of feminist self-labeling. Sex roles, 27 (7/8), 321-330.
10. Delphy, C., 2001. Penser le genre. Paris: Syllepse.
11. Downing, N. and Roush, K., 1985. From passive acceptance to active commitment: a model of feminist identity development for women. The counselling psychologist, 13, 695-709.
12. Duncan, L.E., 1999. Motivation for collective action: group consciousness as mediator of personality, life experiences, and women's rights activism. Political psychology, 20 (3), 611-635.
13. Eurostat, 2008. The life of women and men in Europe. A statistical portrait [online]. Available from: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-80-07-135/EN/KS-80-07-135-EN. PDF [Accessed 15 December 2008].
14. Gerstman, E. and Kramer, D., 1997. Feminist development identity: psychometric analyses of two feminist identity scales. Sex roles, 36 (10/11), 327-348.
15. Goodwin, S. and Fiske, S., 2001. Power and gender: the double-edged sword of ambivalence. In: R. Unger, ed. Psychology of women and gender. New Jersey: Wiley, 358-366.
16. Griffin, C., 1989. I'm not a libber but ...: feminism, consciousness and identity. In: S. Skevington and D. Baker, eds. The social identity of women. London: Sage, 173-193.
17. Guimond, S., et al., 2003. Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84 (4),697-721.
18. Heath, S., 1987. Male feminism. In: A. Jardine and P. Smith, eds. Men in feminism. London: Routledge, 1-32.
19. Hebert, L.A., 2007. Taking 'difference' seriously: feminisms and the 'man question'. Journal of gender studies, 16 (1), 31-45.
20. Henderson-King, D.H. and Stewart, A.J., 1994. Women or feminists? Assessing women's group consciousness. Sex roles, 31 (4/5), 505-516.
21. Henderson-King, D.H. and Stewart, A.J., 1997. Feminist consciousness: perspectives on women's experience. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 23 (4), 415-426.
22. ISSP, 2002. Family and changing gender role III [online]. Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung an der Universität zu Köln. Available from: http://www.gesis.org/ZA/ [Accessed 15 November 2008].
23. Kerfoot, D. and Knights, D., 1994. Into the realm of the fearful: power, identity and gender problematic. In: H. Radtke and H. Stam, eds. Power/gender: social relations in theory and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 67-88.
24. Liss, M.L., et al., 2001. What makes a feminist? Predictors and correlates of feminist social identity in college women. Psychology of women quarterly, 25 (2), 124-133.
25. MacKinnon, D.P., Fairchild, A.J., and Fritz, M.S., 2007. Mediation analysis. Annual review of psychology, 58, 593-614.
26. Masser, B. and Abrams, A., 1999. Contemporary sexism. The relationships among hostility, benevolence, and neosexism. Psychology of women quarterly, 23 (3), 503-517.
27. Messant-Laurent, F., Cerqui, D., and Rey, R., 1991. Temps partiel: piège ou panacée. In: B. Despland, e. In: B. Despland, ed. Femmes et travail. Lausanne: Réalités 163-172.
28. Morgan, B.L., 1996. Putting the feminism into feminism scales: introduction of a liberal feminist attitude and ideology scale (LFAIS). Sex roles, 34 (3), 359-390.
29. Myaskovsky, L. and Wittig, M.A., 1997. Predictors of feminist social identity among college women. Sex roles, 37 (11/12), 861-883.
30. Ng, S., Dunne, M., and Cataldo, M., 1995. Feminist identities and preferred strategies for advancing women's positive self-concept. The journal of social psychology, 135 (6), 561-572.
31. Renzetti, C.M., 1987. New wave or second stage? Attitudes of college women toward feminism. Sex roles, 16 (5/6), 265-277.
32. Rickard, K.M., 1989. The relationship of self-monitored dating behaviors to level of feminist identity on the feminist identity scale. Sex roles, 20 (3), 213-226.
33. Roux, P., 2001. Perception of discrimination, feelings of injustice and women's resistance to gender equality. In: F. Butera and G. Mugny, eds. Social influence in social reality. Promoting individual and social change. Berne: Hogrefe and Huber, 211-223.
34. Roy, R., Weibust, S., and Miller, C., 2007. Effects of stereotypes about feminists on feminist self-identification. Psychology of women quarterly, 31 (2), 146-156.
35. Sobel, M.E., 1982. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological methodology, 13, 290-312.
36. Swim, J.K. and Campbell, B., 2001. Sexism: attitudes, beliefs, and behaviours. In: R. Brown and S. Gaertner, eds. The handbook of social psychology: intergroup relations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 218-237.
37. Swim, J.K. and Cohen, L.L., 1997. Overt, covert, and subtle sexism. A comparison between the attitudes toward women and modern sexism scales. Psychology of women quarterly, 21 (1), 103-118.
38. Swim, J.K., et al., 1995. Sexism and racism: old fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of personality and social psychology, 68 (2), 199-214.
39. Tougas, F., et al., 1995. Neosexism: plus ça change, plus c'est pareil. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 21 (3), 842-849.
40. Tougas, F., et al., 1999. Neosexism among women: the role of personally experienced social mobility attempts. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 25 (12), 1487-1497.
41. Twenge, J.M., 1999. Mapping gender: the multifactorial approach and the organization of gender- related attributes. Psychology of women quarterly, 23 (3), 591-605.
42. United Nations Developments Program, 2007/08. Gender development index report. Available from: http://hdrstats.undp.org/indicators/268.html/ [Accessed 16 December 2008].
43. Williams, R. and Wittig, M., 1997. 'I'm not a feminist, but ...': factors contributing to the discrepancy between pro-feminist orientation and feminist social identity. Sex roles, 37 (11/12), 885-904.
44. Zucker, K., 2001. Biological influences on psychosexual differentiation. In: R. Unger, ed. Psychology of women and gender. New Jersey: Wiley, 101-115.