Let's go formative: Continuous student ratings with web 2.0 application twitter

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 163-167

  Stieger, Stefan ^a   Burger, Christoph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; METHODOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STUDENT; TEACHING;

ADULT; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

EID: 77951133673     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0128     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. McKeachie WJ. Student ratings: the validity of use. American Psychologist 1997; 52:1218-1225
2. Griffin BW. Instructor reputation and student ratings of instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2001; 26:534-552
3. Gurung RAR, Vespia KM. Looking good, teaching well? Linking liking, looks, and learning. Teaching of Psychology 2007; 34:5-10.
4. Marsh HW, Roche LA. Effects of grading leniency and low workload on students' evaluations of teaching: popular myth, bias, validity, or innocent bystanders? Journal of Educational Psychology 2000; 92:202-228
5. Carle AC. Evaluating college students' evaluations of a professor's teaching effectiveness across time and instruction mode (online vs. face-to-face) using a multilevel growth modeling approach. Computers & Education 2009; 53:429-435
6. Remedios R, Lieberman DA. I liked your course because you taught me well: the influence of grades, workload, expectations and goals on students' evaluations of teaching. British Educational Research Journal 2008; 34:91-115.
7. McOwen KS, Kogan JR, Shea JA. Elapsed time between teaching and evaluation: Does it matter? Academic Medicine 2008; 83:S29-32.
8. Steiner DD, Rain JS. Immediate and delayed primacy and recency effects in performance evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology 1989; 74:136-142
9. Dickey D, Pearson C. Recency effect in college student course evaluations. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 2005; 10:1-10.
10. Feldman KA. Consistency and variability among college students in rating their teachers and courses: a review and analysis. Research in Higher Education 1977; 6:223-274
11. Abrahams MB, Friedman CP. Preclinical course-evaluation methods at U.S. and Canadian medical schools. Academic Medicine 1996; 71:371-374
12. McGee JB, Begg M. What medical educators need to know about ''Web 2.0.'' Medical Teacher 2008; 30:164-169
13. Aluja A, Rossier J, Zuckerman M. Equivalence of paper and pencil vs. Internet forms of the ZKPQ-50-CC in Spanish and French samples. Personality & Individual Differences 2007; 43:2022-2032
14. Ekman A, Dickman PW, Klint A, et al. Feasibility of using Web-based questionnaires in large population-based epidemiological studies. European Journal of Epidemiology 2006; 21:103-111 (Pubitemid 43341198)