Expanding the scope and impact of collaborative planning

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 238-249

  Goldstein, Bruce Evan ^a   Butler, William Hale ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative planning; Communities of practice; Ecological restoration; Fire management; Networks

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; FIRE MANAGEMENT; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 77951102784     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944361003646463     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Albrechts, L., & Mandelbaum, S. (Eds.). (2005). The network society: A new context for planning. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
2. Ashcraft, C., & Susskind, N. (2005). Synopsis of the dispute resolution/ deliberative democracy seminar. Retrieved June 10, 2009, from http:// www.csus.edu/ccp/CDN/conferences/06.24.05-DDDRSymposium/ DDDRSymposium-06.24.05.stm
3. Baumgartner, F. R. (2006). Punctuated equilibrium theory and environmental policy. In R. Repetto (Ed.), Punctuated equilibrium and the dynamics of U.S. environmental policy (pp. 24-46). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4. Booher, D. E., & Innes, J. E. (2002). Network power in collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(3), 221-236.
5. Booher, D. E., & Innes, J. E. (2008, November). Governance for adaptive management: CALFED as an emergent complex adaptive network. Paper presented at the Virginia Tech Symposium on Enhancing Resilience to Catastrophic Events through Communicative Planning, Blacksburg, VA.
6. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12 (2), 198-213.
7. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
8. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Davis, S. R., Goldstein, B. E., Butler, W. H., & Goldstein, V. N. (2009). Network leadership assessment. Blacksburg, VA: Institute for Policy and Governance, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
10. Dyer, J. H., & Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a highperformance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345-367.
11. Goldstein, B. E. (2004). War between social worlds: Scientific deadlock during preparation of an endangered species habitat conservation plan (HCP) and the co-production of scientific knowledge and the social order. (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley). Dissertation Abstracts International, 65, 4370.
12. Goldstein, B. E., & Butler, W. H. (2009). The network imaginary: Coherence and creativity within a multiscalar collaborative effort to reform U.S. fire management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52 (8), 1013-1033.
13. Goldstein, B. E., & Butler, W. H. (in press). The U.S. Fire Learning Network: Providing a narrative framework for restoring ecosystems, professions, and institutions. Society and Natural Resources.
14. Goldstein, B. E., Butler, W. H., & Hull, R. B. (in press). The Fire Learning Network: A promising conservation strategy for forestry. Journal of Forestry.
15. Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16. Hajer, M. A., & Wagenaar, H. (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Healey, P. (1993). Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 233-253). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
18. Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. London, UK: MacMillan Press.
19. Hill, B. (2001). United States General Accounting Office testimony before the Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health, Committee on Resources, House of Representatives. Retrieved January 1, 2010, from http://www .gao.gov/new.items/d011022t.pdf
20. Innes, J. E. (1995). Planning theory's emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14 (3), 183-191.
21. Innes, J. E. (1996). Planning through consensus building: A new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62 (4), 460-472.
22. Innes, J. E. (2004). Consensus building: Clarifications for the critics. Planning Theory, 3 (1), 5-20.
23. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65 (4), 412-423.
24. Innes, J. E., Connick, S., & Booher, D. E. (2007). Informality as a planning strategy: Collaborative water management in the CALFED Bay-Delta Program. Journal of the American Planning Association, 73 (2), 195-210.
25. Karl, H., Susskind, L., & Wallace, K. (2007). A dialogue, not a diatribe: Effective integration of science and policy through joint fact finding. Environment, 49 (1), 20-34.
26. Keast, R., Mandell, M. P., Brown, K., & Woolcock, G. (2004). Network structures: Working differently and changing expectations. Public Administration Review, 64 (3), 363-371.
27. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. Margerum, R. (2002). Collaborative planning: Building consensus and building a distinct model for practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(3), 237-253.
29. Margerum, R. (2008). A typology of collaboration efforts in environmental management. Environmental Management, 41 (3), 487-500.
30. Margerum, R., & Whitall, D. (2004). The challenges and implications of collaborative management on a river basin scale. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47 (3), 407-427.
31. Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009. P.L. 111-11, (2009) Retrieved January 23, 2010, from http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/ cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi? dbname=111-cong-public-laws&docid=f:publ011 .111.pdf
32. Powell, W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12 (1), 295-336.
33. Pyne, S. J. (2004). Tending fire: Coping with America's wildland fires. Washington, DC: Island Press.
34. Rothstein, B. (2005). Social traps and the problem of trust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. Schweitzer, L. A., & Howard, E. J. (2008). Planners learning and creating power: A community of practice approach. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28 (1), 50-60.
36. Snyder, W. M., & de Souza Briggs, X. (2003). Communities of practice: A new tool for managers. Retrieved June 30, 2009, from http://www. businessofgovernment.org
37. Snyder, W. M., Wenger, E. C., & de Souza Briggs, X. (2004). Communities of practice in government: Leveraging knowledge for performance. Public Manager, 32 (4), 17-21.q10
38. Susskind, L., McKearnan, S., & Thomas-Larmer, J. (Eds.). (1999). The consensus building handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. The Nature Conservancy. (2001). Proposal to promote restoration of fire-adapted ecosystems through education and community-based partnerships [Unpublished grant proposal]. Arlington, VA: Author.
40. The Nature Conservancy, Global Fire Initiative (2004). Fire, ecosystems and people: A preliminary assessment of fire as a global conservation issue. Tallahassee, FL: Author. Retrieved January 16, 2010, at http://nature .org/initiatives/fire/files/fire-report-version1.pdf
41. Thompson, G. (2003). Between hierarchies and markets: The logic and limits of network forms of organization. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. (2004). Land and resource management plan: Land Between the Lakes National Recreation Area. Retrieved January 8, 2010, from http://www.lbl.org/ LRMPPlanning.html
43. U.S. Fire Learning Network. (2004). FLN dispatch: Emerging lessons from the Fire Learning Network. Retrieved October 24, 2009, from http://www.tncfire. org/training-usfln
44. U.S. Fire Learning Network. (2009). U.S. Fire Learning Network: Field guide 2009. Retrieved January 8, 2010, from http://www.tncfire.org/ documents/USFLNFieldGuide2009.pdf
45. Weber, E. P. (2008, November). Communities can enhance their capacity for socio-ecological resilience to both rapid and gradual climate change. Unpublished paper presented at The Virginia Tech Symposium on Enhancing Resilience to Catastrophic Events Through Communicative Planning, Blacksburg, VA.
46. Wenger, E. C. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47. Wenger, E. C. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7 (2), 225-246.
48. Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78 (1), 139-145.
49. Wondolleck, J., & Yaffee, S. L. (2000). Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
50. Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5, 3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.