Informality as a planning strategy: Collaborative water management in the CALFED Bay-Delta Program

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 195-210

  Innes, Judith E ^a   Connick, Sarah ^a   Booher, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

STAKEHOLDER; STATE ROLE; STRATEGIC APPROACH; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER PLANNING;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA; SAN FRANCISCO BAY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34249830169     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360708976153     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Bardach, E. (1977). The implementation game: What happens after a bill becomes a law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Bardach, E. (1998). Getting agencies to work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
3. Barzelay, M. (1992). Breaking through bureaucracy: A new vision for managing government. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4. Blau, P. M. (1963). The dynamics of bureaucracy: A study of interpersonal relationships in two government agencies (Rev. ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Booher, D. E. (Forthcoming). Collaborative governance. In J. Rabin, Encyclopedia of public administration and public policy. London: Taylor and Francis.
6. Booher, D. E., & Innes, J. E. (2006, July). Complexity and adaptive policy systems: CALFED as an emergent form of governance for sustainable management of contested resources. Paper presented at the International Society for the Systems Sciences, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA.
7. Boxer-Macomber, L. (2003). Too much sun? Emerging challenges presented by California and federal open meeting legislation to public policy consensus building processes. Sacramento, CA: Center for Collaborative Policy, California State University Sacramento.
8. Brandt, A. W. (2002, Spring). An environmental water account: The California experience. University of Denver Water Law Review, 5(2), 426-456.
9. Brunner, R. D., Colburn, C. H., Cromley, C. C., Klein, R. A., & Olson, E. A. (2002). Finding common ground: Governance and natural resources in the American West. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
11. CALFED Bay-Delta Program. (2000). California's water future: A framework for action. Retrieved January 30, 2007 from http://calwater.ca.gov/Archives/GeneralArchive/adobe_pdf/ new_final_framework.pdf
12. California Bay-Delta Authority. (2006). CALFED ten-year action plan. Retrieved January 30, 2007 from http://calwater.ca.gov/ Revitalizing_CALFED/10YearActionPlanLink.shtml
13. Connick, S. (2003). The use of collaborative processes in the making of California water policy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
14. Connick, S., & Innes, J. (2003). Outcomes of collaborative water policy making: Applying complexity thinking to evaluation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46(2), 177-197.
15. Dahl, R. (1961). Who governs: Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Environmental Water Account Review Panel. (2005). Review of the 2003-04 Environmental Water Account (EWA). CALFED Bay-Delta Authority, Sacramento, CA.
16. Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17. Freeman, J., & Farber, D. (2005). Modular environmental regulation. Duke Law Journal, 54(4), 795-912.
18. Fuller, B. W. (2006). Trading zones: Cooperating for water resource and ecosystem management when stakeholders have apparently irreconcilable differences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
19. Furillo, A. (2005, August 26). Delta water agency takes it on the chin: CALFED is mostly slammed at a hearing sought by governor. The Sacramento Bee, p. A3.
20. Gerth, H. H., & Mills, C.W. (1958). From Max Weber. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Gruber, J. (1994). Coordinating growth management through consensus-building: Incentives and the generation of social, intellectual and political capital (Working Paper No. 617). Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley, Institute of Urban and Regional Development.
22. Healey, P. (1992). A planner's day: Knowledge and action in communicative practice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(1), 9-20.
23. Healey, P. (1999). Institutionalist analysis, communicative planning, shaping places. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(2), 111-121.
24. Healey, P. (2006). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies (2nd ed.). London: MacMillan.
25. Hillier, J. (2002). Shadows of power: An allegory of prudence in land use planning. London: Routledge.
26. Howe, E. (1994). Acting on ethics in planning. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
27. Hudzik, C. M. (2003). Evaluating the effectiveness of collaboration in water resources planning in California. Unpublished master's thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
28. Ingram, H., & Fraser, L. (Forthcoming). Path dependency and adroit innovation: The case of California water. In R. Repetto (Ed.), By fits and starts: Punctuated equilibrium and the dynamics of U.S. environmental policy (pp. 78-109). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29. Innes, J. E. (1992). Group processes and the social construction of growth management: Florida, Vermont and New Jersey. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(4), 440-453.
30. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(4), 412-423.
31. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2003). Collaborative policy making: Governance through dialogue. In M. A. Hajer & H. Wagenaar (Eds.), Deliberative policy analysis: Governance in the network society (pp. 33-59). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2005). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory and Practice, 5(4), 419-436.
33. Innes, J. E., & Connick, S. (1999). San Francisco estuary project. In L. Susskind, S. McKearnon, & J. Thomas Larmer (Eds.), The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement (pp. 801-827). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
34. Innes, J.E., Connick, S., Kaplan, L., & Booher, D. (2006). Collaborative governance in the CALFED program: Adaptive policy making for California Water (Working Paper No. 2006-01). Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley, Institute of Urban and Regional Development.
35. Innes, J. E., Gruber, J., Neuman, M., & Thompson, R. (1994). Coordinating growth and environmental management through consensus building (California Policy Seminar CPS Report: A Policy Research Program Report). Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley.
36. Karkkainen, B. C. (2001/2002), Collaborative ecosystem governance: Scale, complexity and dynamism. Virginia Environmental Law Journal, 21(3-1), 189-243.
37. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street level bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
38. Little Hoover Commission. (2005). Still imperiled: Still important. Sacramento, CA: State of California.
39. Mandanaro, L. (2005, October 27). Regional collaborative planning: Habitat protection and the New York-New Jersey Harbor Estuary Program. Paper presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning conference, Kansas City, Missouri.
40. Margerum, R. (1999). Integrated environmental management: Lessons from the Trinity Inlet Management Program. Land Use Policy, 16(3), 179-190.
41. Merriam-Webster's 11th Collegiate Dictionary (CD Rom version 3). (2003). Springfield, MA: Fogware.
42. Morand, D. A. (1995). The role of behavioral formality and informality in the enactment of bureaucratic versus organic organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 831-872.
43. Nawi, D., & Brandt, A. W. (2002, December). CALFED Bay-Delta Program: From conflict to collaboration. Paper presented at University of Miami Law School Conference on Adaptive Management, Coral Gables, Florida.
44. Portes, A., Castells, M., Benton, L. (1989). The informal economy: Studies in advanced and less developed countries. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
45. Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation: how great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland or why it is amazing that federal programs work at all. Berkeley: University of California Press.
46. Reike, E. A. (1996, Spring). The Bay-Delta Accord: A stride toward sustainability. University of Colorado Law Review, 67(2), 341-369.
47. Reisner, M. (1993). Cadillac desert: The American West and its disappearing water. New York: Viking Penguin.
48. Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49. Scholz, J. T., & Stiftel, B. (Eds.). (2005). Adaptive governance and water conflict: New institutions for collaborative planning. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
50. Selznick, P. (1966). TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
51. Stacey, R. D. (1996). Complexity and creativity in organizations. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
52. State of California. (2001). Environmental water account: Needs for legislative definition and oversight. Sacramento, CA: State of California, Legislative Analyst's Office.
53. Susskind, L., McKearnan, S., & Thomas-Larmer, J. (Eds.). (1999). The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54. Taugher, M. (2005, August 26). Warming cited as a threat to the Delta. Contra Costa Times, p. A01.
55. Thomas, C. W. (2003). Bureaucratic landscapes: Interagency cooperation and the preservation of biodiversity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. Truman, D. B. (1951). Govemmental process: Political interests and public opinion. New York: Alfred Knopf.
57. Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Free Press.
58. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
59. Wondolleck, J. M., & Yaffee, S. L. (2000). Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
60. Wright, P. (2001). Fixing the delta: The CALFED Bay-Delta Program and water policy under the Davis administration. Golden Gate University Law Review, 31(4), 331-349.