The relationship between drawing skill and artistic creativity: Do age and artistic involvement make a difference?

Creativity Research Journal

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 27-36

  Chan, David W ^a   Zhao, Yongjun ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951085105     PISSN: 10400419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10400410903579528     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Amabile, T. M. (1982). Children's artistic creativity: Detrimental effects of competition in a field setting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 573-578.
2. Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and divergent thinking: A task-specific approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173-177.
4. Chan, D. W. (2000). Exploring identification procedures of gifted students by teacher ratings, parent ratings and student self-reports in Hong Kong. High Ability Studies, 11, 69-82.
5. Chan, D. W., & Chan, L. (2007). Creativity and drawing abilities of Chinese students in Hong Kong: Is there a connection? New Horizons in Education, 55(3), 77-94.
6. Chan, D. W., Cheung, P., Lau, S., Wu, W. Y. H., Kwong, J. M. L., & Li, W. (2001). Assessing ideational fluency in primary students in Hong Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 359-365.
7. Cheung, P. C., Lau, S., Chan, D. W., & Wu, W. Y. H. (2004). Creative potential of school children in Hong Kong: Norms of the Wallach-Kogan Creativity Tests and their implications. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 69-78.
8. Clark, G., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Teaching talented art students: Principles and practices. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
9. Curriculum Development Council. (2002). Arts education key learning area curriculum guide (Primary 1-Secondary 3). Hong Kong: Government Printer.
10. Education Commission. (2000). Learning for life, learning through life-Reform proposals for the education system in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Author.
11. Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.
12. Gombrich, E. H. (1991). Topics of our time: Twentieth-century issues in learning and in art. London: Phaidon.
13. Hekkert, P., & van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1996). Beauty in the eye of expert and nonexpert beholders: A study in the appraisal of art. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 389-407.
14. Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2005) Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Kozbelt, A. (2004). Originality and technical skill as components of artistic quality. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 157-170.
16. Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L., White, A., Callahan, C., & Hartman, R. (1976). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
17. Rostan, S. M. (1997). A study of young artists: The development of artistic talent and creativity. Creative Research Journal, 10, 175-192.
18. Rostan, S. M., Pariser, D., & Gruber, H. E. (2002). A cross-cultural study of the development of artistic talent, creativity, and giftedness. High Ability Studies, 13, 125-155.
19. Simon, H. A. (1984). Harold Cohen's computer drawings: Comments on computer art. In H. Cohen (Ed.), Computer-as-artist, Buhl Science Center (pp. 14-16). Pittsburgh, PA: Buhl Science Center.
20. Trowbridge, N., & Charles, D. C. (1966). Creativity in art students. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 109, 281-299.
21. Vinacke, W. E. (1952). The psychology of thinking. New York: McGraw-Hill.
22. Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.