Assessing ideational fluency in primary students in Hong Kong

Creativity Research Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 3-4, 2001, Pages 359-365

  Chan, David W ^a   Cheung, Ping Chung ^b   Lau, Sing ^b   Wu, William Y H ^b   Kwong, Jenny M L ^b   Li, Wing Ling ^b  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040524533     PISSN: 10400419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326934crj1334_13     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Cheung, P. C., & Chan, D. W. (1993, August). Creativity: Its relationship to the family and school social environments. Paper presented at the 10th World Conference on Gifted and Talented Children, Toronto, Canada.
2. Cropley, A. J. (1972). A five-year longitudinal study of the validity of creativity tests. Developmental Psychology, 6, 119-124.
3. Dudek, S.Z., Strobel, M. G., & Runco, M. A. (1993). Cumulative and proximal influences on the social environment and children's crentive potential. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 154, 487-499.
4. Eagly, A. H. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 50, 145-158.
5. Feingold, C. N. (1992). Sex differences in variability in intellectual abilities: A new look at an old controversy. Review of Educational Research, 62, 61-84.
6. Feldhusen, J. F., & Goh, B. E. (1995). Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 231-247.
7. Gough, H. G. (1975). A new scientific uses test and its relationship to creativity in research. Journal of Creative Behavior, 9, 245-252.
8. Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267-293.
9. Guilford, J. P., & Christensen, P. R. (1973). The one-way relation between creative potential and IQ. Journal of Creative Behavior, 7, 247-252.
10. Harrigton, D. M. (1975). Effects of explicit instructions to be creative on the psychological meaning of divergent test scores. Journal of Personality, 43, 434-454.
11. Hattie, J. A. (1977). Conditions for administering creativity tests. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 1249-1260.
12. Hattie, J. A. (1980). Should creativity tests be administered under testlike conditions? An empirical study of three alternative conditions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 87-98.
13. Hocevar, D. (1979). Fluency as a confounding factor in the measure of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 191-196.
14. Hocevar, D. (1980). Intelligence, divergent thinking, and creativity. Intelligence, 4, 25-40.
15. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139-155.
16. Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability. A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53-69.
17. Hyde, J. S., & Plant, E. A. (1995). Magnitude of psychological gender differences: Another side to the story. American Psychologist, 50, 159-161.
18. Jacklin, C. N. (1989). Female and male: Issues of gender. American Psychologist, 44, 127-133.
19. Jaquish, G. A., & Ripple, R. E. (1984). Adolescent divergent thinking: A cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15, 95-104.
20. Johnson, L. D. (1985). Creative thinking potential: Another example of U-shaped development? Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 10, 146-159.
21. Jordan, L. A. (1975). Use of canonical analysis in Cropley's "A five-year longitudinal study of the validity of creativity tests." Developmental Psychology, 11, 1-3.
22. Kimball, M. M. (1989). A new perspective on women's math achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 198-214.
23. Kogan, N., & Pankove, E. (1972). Creative ability over a five-year span. Child Development, 43, 427-442.
24. Kogan, N., & Pankove, E. (1974). Long term predictive validity of divergent thinking tests: Some negative evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 802-810.
25. Linn, M. C., & Hyde, J. S. (1989). Gender, mathematics, and science. Educational Researcher, 18, 17-27.
26. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498.
27. Maccoby, E. F., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
28. Marecek, J. (1995). Gender, politics, and psychology's ways of knowing. American Psychologist, 50, 162-163.
29. Milgram, R. M. (1990). Creativity: An idea whose time has come and gone? In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 215-233). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. Milgram, R. M., & Arad, R. (1981). Ideational fluency as a predictor of original problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 568-572.
31. Milgram, R. M., & Milgram, N. A. (1976). Creative thinking and creative performance in Israeli students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 255-259.
32. Milgram, R. M., Milgram, N. A., Rosenbloom, G., & Rabkin, L. (1978). Quantity and quality of creative thinking in children and adolescents. Child Development, 49, 385-388.
33. Mistry, J., & Rogoff, B. (1985). A cultural perspective on the development of talent. In F.D. Horowitz & M. O'Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 125-144). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
34. Moran, J. D., III, Milgram, R. M., Sawyers, J. K., & Fu, V. R. (1983). Original thinking in preschool children. Child Development, 54, 921-926.
35. Richards, R. L. (1976). A comparison of selected Guilford and Wallach-Kogan creative thinking tests in conjunction with measures of intelligence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 10, 151-164.
36. Runco, M. A. (1986a). The discriminant validity of gifted children's divergentthinkingtestscores. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 78-82.
37. Runco, M. A. (1986b). Divergent thinking and creative performance in gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 375-384.
38. Runco, M. A. (1990). Implicit theories and ideational creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 234-252). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39. Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1985). The reliability and validity of ideational originality in the divergent thinking of academically gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 483-501.
40. Runco, M. A., Okuda, S. M., & Thurston, B. J. (1987). The psychometric properties of four systems for scoring divergent thinking tests. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2, 149-156.
41. Runco, M. A., & Pezdek, K. (1984). The effect of radio and television on children's creativity. Human Communications Research, 11, 109-120.
42. Singer, D. L., & Whiton, M. B. (1971). Ideational creativity and expressive aspects of human figure drawing in kindergarten-age children. Developmental Psychology, 4, 366-369.
43. Torrance, E. P. (1968). A longitudinal examination of the fourth grade slump in creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 12, 195-199.
44. Torrance, E. P., & Safter, H. T. (1986). Are children becoming more creative? Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 1-13.
45. Wallach, M A. (1976). Tests tell us little about talent. American Scientist, 64, 57-63.
46. Wallach, M. A. (1985). Creativity testing and giftedness. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O'Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 99-123). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
47. Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
48. Wallbrown, F. H., & Huelsman, C. B., Jr. (1975). The validity of the Wallach-Kogan creativity operations for inner-city children in two areas of visual art. Journal of Personality, 43, 109-126.
49. Zha, Z. (1986). A five-year study of the mental development of supernormal children. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 18, 123-132.
50. Zhou, L., & Zha, Z. (1986). Research on selection of the supernormal children for a special class at age 10. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 18, 388-395.