Erratum: Effectiveness of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD): A South African pilot study (Child Language Teaching and Therapy DOI: 10.1177/0265659009349971);The effectiveness of the picture exchange communication system (PECS) for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD): A South African pilot study

Child Language Teaching and Therapy

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 39-59

  Travis, Julia ^a   Geiger, Martha ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

^b 103 Fairfield Medical Suites   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC); Autism spectrum disorder (ASD); Effectiveness; Intentional communicative acts (ICA); Multiple baseline design (MBD)

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951047574     PISSN: 02656590     EISSN: 14770865     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0265659010376592     Document Type: Erratum

References (44)

1. Adkins T and Axelrod S (2002) Topography- versus selection-based responding: Comparison of mand acquisition in each modality. The Behaviour Analyst Today 2: 259-266
2. American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th edition. DSM-IV-TR. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.
3. Anderson A, Moore DW, and Bourne TL (2007) Functional communication and other concomitant behaviour change following PECS training: A case study. Behaviour Change 24(3): 173-181.
4. Baker S (2001) The Alice Project: The first UK pilot project to evaluate the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS). Unpublished paper presented at the International Association for Behaviour Analysis Conference, Venice, Italy.
5. Beukelman DR and Mirenda P (1998) Augmentative and alternative communication: management of severe communication disorders in children and adults. 2nd edition. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes.
6. Bock SJ, Stoner JB, Beck AR, Hanley L, and Prochnow J (2005) Increasing functional communication in nonspeaking preschool children: Comparison of PECS and VOCA. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities 40(3): 264-278.
7. Bondy A (2001) PECS: Potential benefits and risks. The Behaviour Analyst Today 2: 127-132.
8. Bondy A and Frost L (1994) The Picture Exchange Communication System. Focus on Autistic Behaviour 9(3): 1-9.
9. Bondy A and Frost L (1998) The Picture Exchange Communication System. Seminars in Speech and Language 19: 373-389.
10. Bondy A and Frost L (2002) A picture's worth. Newark, DE: Pyramid Educational Products.
11. Carr D and Felce J (2006a) Brief report: Increase in production of spoken words in some children with autism after PECS teaching to Phase III. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities 37: 780-787.
12. Carr D and Felce J (2006b) The effects PECS teaching to Phase III on the communicative interactions between children with autism and their teachers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities 37: 724-737.
13. Charlop-Christy MH, Carpenter, M, Le L, LeBlanc LA, and Kellet K (2002) Using the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) with children with autism: assessment of PECS acquisition, speech, social-communicative behaviour and problem behaviour. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 35: 213-231.
14. Crystal D, Fletcher P, and Garman M (1981) Language assessment remediation screening procedure profile (LARSP). Reading: University of Reading.
15. Frost L and Bondy A (2002) The Picture Exchange Communication System Training Manual. 2nd Edition. Newark, DE: Pyramid Educational Products.
16. Ganz JB and Simpson RL (2004) Effects on communicative requesting and speech development of the Picture Exchange Communication System in children with characteristics of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 34(4): 395-409.
17. Ganz J, Simpson R, and Corbin-Newsome J (2008) The impact of the Picture Exchange Communication System on requesting and speech development in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders and similar characteristics. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 2: 157-169.
18. Heneker S and Page LM (2003) Functional communication: The impact of PECS. Speech and Language Therapy in Practice, autumn: 12-14.
19. Howlin P, Gordon RK, Pasco G, Wade A and Charman T (2007) The effectiveness of Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) training for teachers of children with autism: A pragmatic group randomised controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 48(5): 473-481.
20. Iacono TA, Waring RE, and Chan JB (1996) Sampling communicative behaviours in children with intellectual disability in structured and unstructured situations. European Journal of Disorders of Communication 31: 106-120.
21. Koita H and Sonoyama S (2004) Communication training using the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS): Case study of a child with autistic disorder. Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 19: 161-174.
22. Kravits TR, Kamps DM, Kemmerer K, and Potucek J (2002) Brief report: Increasing communication skills for elementary-aged students with Autism using the Picture Exchange Communication System. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 32(3): 225-230
23. Liddle K (2001) Implementing the picture exchange communication system (PECS). International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 36(supplement): 391-395.
24. Light JC, Roberts B, Dimarco R, and Greiner N (1998) Augmentative and alternative communication to support receptive and expressive communication for people with autism. Journal of Communication Disorders 31: 153-180.
25. Magiati I and Howlin P (2003) A pilot evaluation study of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) for children with autistic spectrum disorders. The International Journal of Autism 7(3): 297-320.
26. Naud́ E (2002) A profile of pragmatic skills in young children. Clinica: Applications in clinical practice of communication pathology. Monograph 6. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.
27. Schlosser RW (2003a) Validity. In: Schlosser RW (ed.) The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence-based practice. New York: Academic Press, 27-41.
28. Schlosser RW (2003b) Synthesizing efficacy research in AAC. In: Schlosser RW (ed.) The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence-based practice. New York: Academic Press, 229-257
29. Schwartz I, Garfinkle A, and Bauer J (1998) The Picture Exchange Communication System: Communicative outcomes for young children with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education 18(3): 144-159.
30. Scruggs TE and Mastropieri MA (2001) How to summarize single-participant research: Ideas and applications. Exceptionality 9: 227-245.
31. Scruggs TE, Mastropieri MA, and Casto G (1987) The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education 8: 24-33.
32. Serpentine EC and Drager KD (2007) The effectiveness of PECS in children with autism spectrum disorder. Pittsburgh, PA: Pennsylvania State University.
33. Son SH, Sigafoos J, O'Reilly M, and Lancioni GE (2006) Comparing two types of augmentative and alternative communication systems for children with autism. Pediatric Rehabilitation 9(4): 389-395.
34. Tincani M (2004) Comparing the Picture Exchange Communication System and sign language training for children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 19(3): 152-163.
35. Tincani M, Crozier S, and Alazetta L (2006) The Picture Exchange Communication System: Effects on manding and speech development for school-aged children with autism. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities 41: 177-184
36. Ulin PR, Robinson ET, Tolley EE, and McNeill ET (2002) Qualitative methods: A field guide for applied research in sexual and reproductive health. Research Triangle Park, NC: Family Health International.
37. Webb T (2000) Can children with autism be taught to communicate using PECS? Good Autism Practice (GAP) 1(1): 29-43.
38. Wendt O (2007) The evidence base for augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in autism spectrum disorders: A systematic research review. Unpublished research presentation presented at the Institute of Child Health, London.
39. Wendt O, Schlosser RW, and Lloyd LL (2004) Augmentative and alternative communication for children with autism: preliminary results of a meta-analysis. Unpublished paper presented at the AAMR, Philadelphia, PA.
40. Wetherby AM and Prizant BM (1989) The expression of communicative intent: Assessment le guidelines. Seminars in Speech and Language 10: 77-91.
41. Wetherby AM and Rodriguez G (1992) Measurement of communicative intentions in normally developing children during structured and unstructured contexts. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 31: 240-252.
42. Yoder P and Stone W (2006a) Randomized comparison of two communication interventions for preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 74: 426-435.
43. Yoder P and Stone W (2006b) Randomized comparison of the effect of two prelinguistic communication interventions on the acquisition of spoken communication in preschoolers with ASD. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 49: 698-711.
44. Yokoyama K, Naoi N, and Yamamoto J (2006) Teaching verbal behavior using the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) with children with autistic spectrum disorder. Japanese Journal of Special Education 43: 485-503.