Robust overwhelming control of a hydraulically driven three-degrees-of- freedom parallel manipulator through a simplified fast inverse model

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering

Volumn 224, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 169-184

  Bera, T K ^a   Samantaray, A K ^a   Karmakar, R ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Bond graph; Force control; Hydraulic parallel robot manipulator; Implicit system inversion; Overwhelming control; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ACTUAL SYSTEM; APPROXIMATE INVERSE; BOND GRAPH; CONTROL STRATEGIES; CONTROLLER DESIGNS; DRIVING FORCES; ELECTRO-HYDRAULIC ACTUATOR; FEEDBACK GAIN; FORCE-FEEDBACK; HYDRAULIC PRESSURE; IMPLICIT SYSTEMS; INVERSE MODELS; MODEL-BASED; OVERWHELMING CONTROL; PARALLEL MANIPULATORS; PARALLEL ROBOT MANIPULATOR; PHYSICAL MODEL; PLANAR VEHICLES; REAL-TIME IMPLEMENTATIONS; SERVO-VALVE; SIMULATION RESULT;

ACTUATORS; AUTOMOBILE SIMULATORS; DESIGN; ENGINES; FLEXIBLE MANIPULATORS; FORCE CONTROL; GRAPH THEORY; HYDRAULICS; INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS; MODULAR ROBOTS; REAL TIME CONTROL; ROBOT APPLICATIONS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

CONTROLLERS;

EID: 77951015897     PISSN: 09596518     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/09596518JSCE828     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Wang, X., Baron, L., and Cloutier, G. Topology of serial and parallel manipulators and topological diagrams. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2008, 43, 754-770. (Pubitemid 351503599)
2. Stewart, D. A platform with six degrees of freedom. Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs, 1965-1966, 180(15), 371-386.
3. Gough, V. E. and Whitehall, S. G. Universal tire test machine. In: Proceeding of Ninth International Automobile Technical Congress FISITA, IMechE, London, May 1962, pp. 117-137.
4. Sirouspour, M. R. and Salcudean, S. E. Nonlinear control of hydraulic robots. IEEE Trans. Robotics Automn, 2001, 17(2), 173-182.
5. Eryilmaz, B. and Wilson, B. H. Unified modeling and analysis of a proportional valve. J. Franklin Inst., 2006, 343, 48-68. (Pubitemid 41767734)
6. Guo, H. B., Liu, Y. G., Liu, G. R., and Li, H. R. Cascade control of a hydraulically driven 6-DOF parallel robot manipulator based on a sliding mode. Control Engng Practice, 2008, 16, 1055-1068.
7. Karnopp, D. C., Margolis, D. L., and Rosenberg, R. C. System dynamics, modeling and simulation of mechatronic systems, 2000 (Wiley, NY).
8. Borutzky, W. Bond graphs: a methodology for modelling multidisciplinary dynamic systems, 2004 (SCS Publishing House, Erlangen, San Diego).
9. Mukherjee, A., Karmakar, R., and Samantaray, A. K. Bond graph in modeling, simulation and fault identification, 2006 (CRC Press, FL).
10. Tsai, L. W. Solving the inverse dynamics of a Stewart-Gough manipulator by the principle of virtual work. J. Mech. Des., Trans. ASME, 2000, 122, 3-9.
11. Dasgupta, B. and Mruthyunjaya, T. S. A Newton- Euler formulation for the inverse dynamics of the Stewart platform manipulator. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 1998, 33(8), 1135-1152. (Pubitemid 128416623)
12. Dasgupta, B. and Mruthyunjaya, T. S. Closed-form dynamic equations of the general Stewart platform through the Newton Euler approach. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 1998, 33(7), 993-1012. (Pubitemid 128414311)
13. Samantaray, A. K. and Ould-Bouamama, B. Model-based process supervision, 2008 (Springer Verlag, London).
14. Margolis, D. and Shim, T. A bond graph model incorporating sensors, actuators, and vehicle dynamics for developing controllers for vehicle safety. J. Franklin Inst., 2001, 338, 21-34. (Pubitemid 32139040)
15. Dauphin-Tanguy, G., Rahmani, A., and Sueur, C. Bond graph aided design of controlled systems. Simulation Practice and Theory, 1999, 7(5-6), 493-513. (Pubitemid 30544853)
16. Gawthrop, P. J. Bond graphs: a representation for mechatronic systems. Mechatronics, 1991, 1(2), 127-156.
17. Granda, J. J. The role of bond graph modeling and simulation in mechatronics systems: An integrated software tool: Camp-G, Matlab-Simulink. Mechatronics, 2002, 12(9-10), 1271-1295.
18. Lin, C. F., Tseng, C. Y., and Tseng, T. W. A hardware-in-the-loop dynamics simulator for motorcycle rapid controller prototyping. Control Engng Practice, 2006, 14(12), 1467-1476.
19. Bruns, F. W. and Erbe, H. H. Mixed reality with hyper-bond: a means for remote labs. Control Engng Practice, 2007, 15(11), 1435-1444.
20. Cho, W. A bond graph approach to the modeling of general multibody dynamics systems. KEME Int. J., 1998, 12(5), 888-898. (Pubitemid 128683944)
21. Favre, W. and Scavarda, S. Bond Graph representation of multibody systems with kinematic loops. J. Franklin Inst., 1998, 335B(4), 643-660. (Pubitemid 128387963)
22. Merzouki, R., Ould-Bouamama, B., Djeziri, M. A., and Bouteldja, M. Modelling and estimation of tire-road longitudinal impact efforts using bond graph approach. Mechatronics, 2007, 17(2-3), 93-108. (Pubitemid 46210048)
23. Gawthrop, P. J., Jones, R. W., and Mackenzie, S. A. Identification of partially-known systems. Automatica, 1992, 28(4), 831-836.
24. Merzouki, R., Medjaher, K., Djeziri, M. A., and Ould-Bouamama, B. Backlash fault detection in mechatronic system. Mechatronics, 2007, 17(6), 299-310. (Pubitemid 46881283)
25. Ould-Bouamama, B., Medjaher, K., Samantaray, A. K., and Staroswiecki, M. Supervision of an industrial steam generator. Part I: Bond graph modeling. Control Engng Practice, 2006, 14(1), 71-83. (Pubitemid 41447912)
26. Ngwompo, R. F. and Gawthrop, P. J. Bond graphbased simulation of non-linear inverse systems using physical performance specifications. J. Franklin Inst., 1999, 336(8), 1225-1247.
27. Gawthrop, P. J. and Bevan, G. P. Bond-graph modeling. IEEE Control Systems Mag., 2007, 27(2), 24-45.
28. Ngwompo, R. F., Scavarda, S., and Thomasset, D. Physical model-based inversion in control systems design using bond graph representation. Part 1: theory. Proc. IMechE, Part I: J. Systems and Control Engineering, 2001, 215(I2), 95-104. DOI: 10.1243/ 0959651011540888. (Pubitemid 34459421)
29. Ngwompo, R. F., Scavarda, S., and Thomasset, D. Physical model-based inversion in control systems design using bond graph representation. Part 2: applications. Proc. IMechE, Part I: J. Systems and Control Engineering, 2001, 215(I2), 105-112. DOI: 10.1243/0959651011540897. (Pubitemid 34459422)
30. Pathak, P. M., Kumar, R. P., Mukherjee, A., and Dasgupta, A. A scheme for robust trajectory control of space robots. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2008, 16(9), 1337-1349.
31. Merrit, H. E. Hydraulic control systems., 1967 (Wiley, New York, USA).
32. Sharon, A., Hogan, N., and Hardt, D. E. Controller design in the physical domain. J. Franklin Inst., 1991, 328, 697-721. (Pubitemid 20606378)