Femur first in hip arthroplasty the concept of combined anteversion;Femur first beim hüftgelenksersatz das konzept der kombinierten anteversion

Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie

Volumn 148, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 185-190

  Sendtner, E ^a   Muller M ^b   Winkler, R ^a   Worner M ^a   Grifka, J ^a   Renkawitz, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Combined anteversion; Femur first; Navigation; Total hip replacement

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SOFTWARE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 77950961211     PISSN: 1864-669     EISSN: 18646743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1240969     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ranawat C S., Ranawat A S., Rasquinha V J. Mastering the art of cemented femoral stem fixation. Review. J Arthroplasty 2004 19 (Suppl.1) 85-91
2. D'Lima D D., Urquhart A G., Buehler K O. et al. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2000 82 315-321
3. Sendtner E, Boluki D, Grifka J. Aktueller Stand der minimalinvasiven Hüftendoprothetik in Deutschland, neue Implantate und Navigation Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Umfrage. Z Orthop Unfall 2007 145 297-302
4. Michel M C., Witschger P. MicroHip: a minimally invasive procedure for total hip replacement surgery using a modified Smith-Peterson approach. Review. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2007 9 46-51 (Pubitemid 46890502)
5. Dorr L D., Malik A, Dastane M et al. Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009 467 119-127
6. Amuwa C, Dorr L D. The combined anteversion technique for acetabular component anteversion. J Arthroplasty 2008 23 1068-1070
7. Wines A P., McNicol D J. Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty. Arthroplasty 2006 21 696-701 (Pubitemid 44108578)
8. Sariali E, Mouttet A, Pasquier G et al. Accuracy of reconstruction of the hip using computerised three-dimensional pre-operative planning and a cementless modular neck. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009 91 333-340
9. Lewinnek G E., Lewis J L., Tarr R et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1978 60 217-220 (Pubitemid 8311727)
10. Biedermann R, Tonin A, Krismer M et al. Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005 87 762-769
11. Archbold H A., Mockford B, Molloy D et al. The transverse acetabular ligament: an aid to orientation of the acetabular component during primary total hip replacement: a preliminary study of 1000 cases investigating postoperative stability. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006 88 883-886 (Pubitemid 44057174)
12. Archbold H A., Slomczykowski M, Crone M et al. The relationship of the orientation of the transverse acetabular ligament and acetabular labrum to the suggested safe zones of cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 2008 18 1-6 (Pubitemid 351712144)
13. Hessmann M H., Hübschle L, Tannast M et al. Irritation of the iliopsoas tendon after total hip arthroplasty. Orthopade 2007 36 746-751 (Pubitemid 350131629)
14. Vandenbussche E, Saffarini M, Taillieu F et al. The asymmetric profile of the acetabulum. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008 466 417-423 (Pubitemid 351912909)
15. Renkawitz T, Tingart M, Grifka J et al. Computer-assisted total hip arthroplasty: coding the next generation of navigation systems for orthopedic surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices 2009 6 507-514
16. Widmer K H. Containment versus impingement: finding a compromise for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2007 31 (Suppl.1) S29-S33
17. Babisch J W., Layher F, Amiot L P. The rationale for tilt-adjusted acetabular cup navigation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008 90 357-365 (Pubitemid 351341048)
18. Eddine T A., Migaud H, Chantelot C et al. Variations of pelvic anteversion in the lying and standing positions: analysis of 24 control subjects and implications for CT measurement of position of a prosthetic cup. Surg Radiol Anat 2001 23 105-110 (Pubitemid 32509884)
19. Nishihara S, Sugano N, Nishii T et al. Measurements of pelvic flexion angle using three-dimensional computed tomography. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003 411 140-151 (Pubitemid 36667271)
20. Parratte S, Pagnano M W., Coleman-Wood K et al. The 2008 Frank Stinchfield award: variation in postoperative pelvic tilt may confound the accuracy of hip navigation systems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009 467 43-49
21. Sariali E, Lazennec J Y., Khiami F et al. Modification of pelvic orientation after total hip replacement in primary osteoarthritis. Hip Int 2009 19 257-263
22. Müller O, Lembeck B, Reize P et al. Quantifizierung und Visualisierung des Einflusses der Beckenkippung auf die Messung von Pfanneninklination und -anteversion. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2005 143 72-78 (Pubitemid 40459532)
23. Asayama I, Akiyoshi Y, Naito M et al. Intraoperative pelvic motion in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004 19 992-997
24. Rousseau M A., Lazennec J Y., Boyer P et al. Optimization of total hip arthroplasty implantation: is the anterior pelvic plane concept valid? J Arthroplasty 2009 24 22-26
25. Malik A, Maheshwari A, Dorr L D. Impingement with total hip replacement. Review. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007 89 1832-1842 (Pubitemid 47229894)