Properties of male ejaculates do not generate geographical variation in female mating tactics in a butterfly Pieris napi

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 79, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1173-1179

  Välimäki, Panu ^a   Kaitala, Arja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

green veined white butterfly; monandry; nuptial feeding; Pieris napi; polyandry; sexual conflict

Indexed keywords

BODY SIZE; BUTTERFLY; COEVOLUTION; FITNESS; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; NUPTIAL GIFT; PATERNITY; POLYANDRY; REPRODUCTIVE COST; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; SPERMATOPHORE;

PIERIS BRASSICAE; PIERIS NAPI;

EID: 77950859858     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.030     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Andersson M. Sexual Selection (1994), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
2. Andersson J., Borg-Karlsson A.-K., and Wiklund C. Sexual conflict and anti-aphrodisiac titre in a polyandrous butterfly: male ejaculate tailoring and absence of female control. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 271 (2004) 1765-1770
3. Arnqvist G. Multiple mating in a water strider: mutual benefits or intersexual conflict?. Animal Behaviour 38 (1989) 749-756
4. Arnqvist G., and Nilsson T. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Animal Behaviour 60 (2000) 145-164
5. Arnqvist G., and Rowe L. Sexual Conflict (2005), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
6. Bergström J., and Wiklund C. Effects of size and nuptial gifts on butterfly reproduction: can females compensate for a smaller size through male-derived nutrients?. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 52 (2002) 296-302
7. Birkhead T.R., and Møller A.P. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (1998), Academic Press, London
8. Bissoondath C.J., and Wiklund C. Effect of male history and body size on ejaculate size and quality in two polyandrous butterflies, Pieris napi and Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Functional Ecology 10 (1996) 457-464
9. Bissoondath C.J., and Wiklund C. Effect of male body size on sperm precedence in the polyandrous butterfly Pieris napi L. (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Behavioral Ecology 8 (1997) 518-523
10. Boggs C.L., and Gilbert L.E. Male contribution to egg production in butterflies: evidence for transfer of nutrients at mating. Science 206 (1979) 83-84
11. Broström G. glm Generalized Linear Models with Clustering. R-package version 0.65-1 (2006). http://cran.r-project.org/
12. Chippindale A.K., Chu T.J.F., and Rose M.R. Complex trade-offs and the evolution of starvation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 50 (1996) 753-766
13. Cook P., and Wedell N. Non-fertile sperm delay female remating. Nature 397 (1999) 486
14. Drummond B.A. Multiple mating and sperm competition in the Lepidoptera. In: Smith R.L. (Ed). Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems (1984), Academic Press, London 547-572
15. Dunn D.W., Sumner J.P., and Goulson D. The benefits of multiple mating to female seaweed flies, Coelopa frigida (Diptera: Coelpidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 58 (2005) 128-135
16. Eberhard W.G., and Cordero C. Sexual selection by cryptic female choice on male seminal products: a new bridge between sexual selection and reproductive physiology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10 (1995) 493-496
17. Fedorka K.M., and Mousseau T.A. Material and genetic benefits of female multiple mating and polyandry. Animal Behaviour 64 (2002) 361-367
18. Forsberg J., and Wiklund C. Mating in the afternoon: timesaving in courtship and remating by females of a polyandrous butterfly Pieris napi. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 25 (1989) 349-356
19. Gavrilets S., and Hayashi T.I. The dynamics of two- and three-way sexual conflicts over mating. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 361 (2006) 345-354
20. Gotthard K., Nylin S., and Wiklund C. Adaptive variation in growth rate: life history costs and consequences in the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria. Oecologia 99 (1994) 281-289
21. Jennions M.D., and Petrie M. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews 75 (2000) 21-64
22. Kaitala A., and Wiklund C. Polyandrous female butterflies forage for matings. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 35 (1994) 385-388
23. Kaitala A., and Wiklund C. Female mate choice and mating costs in the polyandrous butterfly Pieris napi. Journal of Insect Behavior 8 (1995) 355-363
24. Kokko H., and Mappes J. Sexual selection when fertilization is not guaranteed. Evolution 59 (2005) 1876-1885
25. McCulloch C.E., and Searle S.R. Generalized Linear and Mixed Models (2001), J. Wiley, New York
26. Martens A., and Rehfeldt G. Female aggregation in Platycypha caligata (Odonata: Chlorocyphidae): a tactic to evade male interference during oviposition. Animal Behaviour 37 (1989) 369-374
27. Parker G.A. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biological Reviews 45 (1970) 525-567
28. Pinheiro J., Bates D., DebRoy S., and Sarkar D. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R Package, Version 3.1-78 (2006). http://cran.r-project.org/
29. R Development Core Team. R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (2006), R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org
30. Rice W.R., and Holland B. The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE), and the intraspecific Red Queen. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 41 (1997) 1-10
31. Rutowski R.L., Long C.E., Marshall L.D., and Vetter R.S. Courtship solicitation by Colias females (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). American Midland Naturalist 105 (1981) 334-340
32. Scoble M.J. The Lepidoptera: Form, Function and Diversity (1992), The Natural History Museum/Oxford University Press, New York
33. Simmons L. Sperm Competition and Its Evolutionary Consequences in Insects (2001), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
34. Stockhoff B.A. Starvation resistance of gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae): trade-offs among growth, body size, and survival. Oecologia 88 (1991) 422-429
35. Stone G. Female foraging responses to sexual harassment in the solitary bee Anthophora plumipes. Animal Behaviour 50 (1995) 405-412
36. Strathdee A.T., and Bale J.S. Life on the edge: insect ecology in arctic environments. Annual Review of Entomology 43 (1998) 85-106
37. Sugawara T. Stretch reception in the bursa copulatrix of the butterfly, Pieris rapae crucivora, and its role in behaviour. Journal of Comparative Physiology 130 (1979) 191-199
38. Svärd L., and Wiklund C. Mass and production rate of ejaculates in relation to monandry/polyandry in butterflies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 24 (1989) 395-402
39. Tregenza T., and Wedell N. Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review. Molecular Ecology 9 (2000) 1013-1027
40. Vahed K. The function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studies. Biological Reviews 73 (1998) 43-78
41. Välimäki P., and Kaitala A. Does a lack of mating opportunities explain monandry in the green-veined white butterfly (Pieris napi)?. Oikos 115 (2006) 110-116
42. Välimäki P., and Kaitala A. Life history trade-offs in relation to the degree of polyandry and developmental pathway in Pieris napi (Lepidoptera, Pieridae). Oikos 116 (2007) 1569-1580
43. Välimäki P., Kaitala A., and Kokko H. Temporal patterns in reproduction may explain variation in mating frequencies in the green-veined white butterfly Pieris napi. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61 (2006) 99-107
44. Välimäki P., Kivelä S.M., Jääskeläinen L., Kaitala A., Kaitala V., and Oksanen J. Divergent timing of egg-laying may maintain life history polymorphism in potentially multivoltine insects in seasonal environments. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21 (2008) 1711-1723
45. Watanabe M. Multiple matings increase the fecundity of the yellow swallowtail butterfly, Papilio xuthus L., in summer generations. Journal of Insect Behavior 1 (1988) 17-27
46. Wedell N. Female remating in butterflies: interaction between female genotype and nonfertile sperm. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14 (2001) 746-754
47. Wedell N. Male genotype affects female fitness in a paternally investing species. Evolution 60 (2006) 1638-1645
48. Wedell N., Wiklund C., and Cook P.A. Monandry and polyandry as alternative lifestyles in a butterfly. Behavioral Ecology 13 (2002) 450-455
49. Wedell N., Wiklund C., and Bergström J. Coevolution of non-fertile sperm and female receptivity in a butterfly. Biology Letters 5 (2009) 678-681
50. Wiklund C., and Kaitala A. Sexual selection for large male size in a polyandrous butterfly: the effect of body size on male versus female reproductive success in Pieris napi. Behavioral Ecology 6 (1995) 6-13
51. Wiklund C., Nylin S., and Forsberg J. Sex-related variation in growth rate as a result of selection for large size and protandry in a bivoltine butterfly (Pieris napi L.). Oikos 60 (1991) 241-250
52. Wiklund C., Kaitala A., Lindfors V., and Abenius J. Polyandry and its effect on female reproduction in the green-veined white butterfly (Pieris napi L.). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 33 (1993) 25-33
53. Wiklund C., Kaitala A., and Wedell N. Decoupling of reproductive rates and parental expenditure in a polyandrous butterfly. Behavioral Ecology 9 (1998) 20-25
54. Zeh J.A., and Zeh D.W. The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 263 (1996) 1711-1717