What scale matters? exploring the relationships between individuals' social position, neighbourhood context and the scale of neighbourhood

Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 23-43

  Andersson, Roger ^a   Musterd, Sako ^b  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Longitudinal; Multi level; Neighburhood effect; Scale; Social mix; Social outcome

Indexed keywords

METROPOLITAN AREA; NEIGHBORHOOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; SCALE EFFECT; SOCIAL INCLUSION; URBAN POPULATION;

SWEDEN;

EID: 77950849505     PISSN: 04353684     EISSN: 14680467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2010.00331.x     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Ainsworth JW. Why does it take a village? The mediation of neighbourhood effects on educational achievement. Social Forces 2002, 81(1):117-152.
2. Andersson R. Etnisk och socioekonomisk segregation i Sverige 1990-1998. Välfärdens förutsättningar: arbetsmarknad, demografi och segregation. Antologi från Kommittén Välfär dsbokslut 2000, 223-266. Fritzell J. in, Statens Offentliga Utredningar 2000: 37, Fritzes Offentliga Publikationer, Stockholm, pp.
3. Andersson R. Spaces of socialization and social network competition: a study of neighbourhood effects in Stockholm, Sweden. Governing European Cities: Social Fragmentation and Urban Governance 2001, 149-188. Andersen HTKempen R van. in, Ashgate, Aldershot, pp.
4. Andersson R. " Breaking segregation" - rhetorical construct or effective policy? The case of the Metropolitan Development Initiative in Sweden. Urban Studies 2006, 43(4):787-799.
5. Andersson R. Neighbourhood effects and the welfare state: towards a European research agenda?. Schmollers Jahrbuch 2008, 128:1-14.
6. Andersson R, BrÅMÅ Å. Selective migration in Swedish distressed neighbourhoods: can area-based urban policies counteract segregation processes?. Housing Studies 2004, 19(4):517-539.
7. Andersson R, Musterd S. Area-based policies: a critical appraisal. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 2005, 96(4):377-389.
8. Andersson R, Musterd S, Galster G, Kauppinen TM. What mix matters? Exploring the relationships between individuals' incomes and different measures of their neighbourhood context. Housing Studies 2007, 22(5):637-660.
9. ÅSlund O, ÖSth J, Zenou Y. How important is access to jobs? Old question - improved answer: Journal of Economic Geography. forthcoming
10. Atkinson R, Kintrea K. Disentangling area effects: evidence from deprived and non-deprived neighbourhoods. Urban Studies 2001, 38(12):2277-2298.
11. Blokland T. Urban Bonds: Social Relationships in an Inner City Neighbourhood 2003, Polity, Cambridge
12. BrÅMÅ Å. Studies in the Dynamics of Residential Segregation. Geografiska regionstudier 67 2006, Department of Social and Economic Geography, Uppsala University, Uppsala
13. BrÄNnstrÖM L. Does neighbourhood origin matter? A longitudinal multilevel assessment of neighbourhood effects on income and receipt of social assistance in a Stockholm birth cohort. Housing, Theory and Society 2005, 22(4):169-195.
14. Bridge G, Forrest R, Holland E. Neighbouring: a review of the evidence. 2004, CNR Paper 24, ESRC Centre for Neighbourhood Research, University of Bristol, Bristol, November
15. Briggs X. Moving up versus moving out: neighbourhood effects in housing mobility programs. Housing Policy Debate 1997, 8(1):195-234.
16. Buck N. Identifying neighbourhood effects on social exclusion. Urban Studies 2001, 38(12):2251-2275.
17. Buonfino A, Hilder P. Neighbouring in Contemporary Britain. A Think Piece for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation Housing and Neighbourhoods Committee 2006, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York
18. Burgess S, Gardiner K, Propper C. Growing up: school, family and area influences on adolescents' later life chances. 2001, CASE paper 49, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics, London, September
19. Castells M. The Informational City: Information Technology, Economic Restructuring, and the Urban-Regional Process 1989, Blackwell, Oxford
20. Dietz RD. The estimation of neighborhood effects in the social sciences: an interdisciplinary approach. Social Science Research 2002, 31(4):539-575.
21. Duncan GJ, Connell JP, Klebanov PK. Conceptual and methodological issues in estimating causal effects of neighborhoods and family conditions on individual development. Neighborhood Poverty, Vol. 1: Context and Consequences for Children 1997, 219-250. Brooks-Gunn J, Duncan GJ, Aber JL. in, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp.
22. Ellen IG, Turner MA. Does neighborhood matter? Assessing recent evidence. Housing Policy Debate 1997, 8(4):833-866.
23. Farwick A, Klagge B, Taubmannn W. Urban poverty in Germany. Studies in Segregation and Desegregation 2002, 133-157. Schnell I, Ostendorf W, in, Ashgate, Aldershot, pp.
24. Fischer CS. To Dwell among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City 1982, University of Chicago Press, Chicago
25. Friedrichs J. Do poor neighbourhoods make their residents poorer? Context effects of poverty neighbourhoods on residents. Empirical Poverty Research in Comparative Perspective 1998, 77-99. Andress H-J. in, Ashgate, Aldershot, pp.
26. Friedrichs J, Galster G, Musterd S. Neighbourhood effects on social opportunities: the European and American research and policy context. Housing Studies 2003, 18(6):797-806.
27. Galster G. Trans-Atlantic perspectives on opportunity, deprivation and the housing nexus. Housing Studies 2002, 17(1):5-10.
28. Galster G. Neighbourhood Mix, Social Opportunities, and the Policy Challenges of an Increasingly Diverse Amsterdam. Wibaut lecture 2005, Amsterdam Institute for Metropolitan and International Development Studies (AMIDSt), University of Amsterdam
29. Galster G, Andersson R, Musterd S. Who is affected by neighbourhood income mix? Gender, age, family, employment and income differences: Urban Studies. forthcoming
30. Galster G, Andersson R, Musterd S, Kauppinen TM. Does neighborhood income mix affect earnings of adults? New evidence from Sweden. Journal of Urban Economics 2008, 63(3):858-870.
31. Gephart MA. Neighborhoods and communities as contexts for development. Neighborhood Poverty, Vol. 1: Context and Consequences for Children 1997, 1-43. Brooks-Gunn JDuncan GJAber JL. in, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp.
32. Haurin DR, Dietz RD, Weinberg BA. The impact of neighborhood homeownership rates: a review of the theoretical and empirical literature. Journal of Housing Research 2002, 13(2):119-151.
33. Hox J. Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications 2002, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
34. Ioannides YM, Loury LD. Job information networks, neighborhood effets, and inequality. Journal of Economic Literature 2004, 42(4):1056-1093.
35. Janowitz M. The Community Press in an Urban Setting: An Emperical Study of Metropolitain Integration 1952, Free Press, Glencoe, IL
36. Jencks C, Mayer S. The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. Inner-city Poverty in the United States 1990, 111-186. Lynn LE, Mcgeary MFH. in, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp.
37. Johnston RJ. The geography of the working class and the geography of the Labour vote in England, 1983: a prefatory note to a research agenda. Political Geography Quarterly 1987, 6(1):7-16.
38. Johnston RJ, Jones K, Burgess S, Propper C, Sarker R, Bolster A. Scale, factor analyses, and neighborhood effects. Geographical Analysis 2004, 36(4):350-369.
39. Johnston RJ, Propper C, Burgess S, Sarker R, Bolster A, Jones K. Spatial scale and the neighbourhood effect: multinomial models of voting at two recent British general elections. British Journal of Political Science 2005, 35(3):487-514.
40. Jones K. Specifying and estimating multi-level models for geographical research. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 1991, NS 16(2):148-160.
41. Kearns A. Response: from residential disadvantage to opportunity? Reflections on British and European policy and research. Housing Studies 2002, 17(1):145-150.
42. Kearns A, Parkes A. Living in and leaving poor neighbourhood conditions in England. Housing Studies 2003, 18(6):827-851.
43. Leventhal T, Brooks-Gunn J. The neighborhoods they live in: the effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin 2000, 126(2):309-337.
44. Lupton R. Neighbourhood effects': can we measure them and does it matter?. 2003, CASE paper 73, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics, London, November
45. Manski CF. Identification Problems in the Social Sciences 1995, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
46. Manski CF. Economic analysis of social interactions. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2000, 14(3):115-136.
47. Musterd S, Andersson R. Housing mix, social mix and social opportunities. Urban Affairs Review 2005, 40(6):761-790.
48. Musterd S, Andersson R. Employment, social mobility and neighbourhood effects: the case of Sweden. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2006, 30(1):120-140.
49. Musterd S, Andersson R, Galster G, Kauppinen TM. Are immigrants' earnings influenced by the characteristics of their neighbours?. Environment and Planning A 2008, 40(4):785-805.
50. Musterd S, Ostendorf W, Vos S de. Environmental effects and social mobility: a longitudinal analysis. Housing Studies 2003, 18(6):877-892.
51. Nakaya T. An information statistical approach to the modifiable areal unit problem in incidence rate maps. Environment and Planning A 2000, 32(1):91-109.
52. Openshaw S. The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. 1984, CATMOG 38, Geo Abstracts, Norwich
53. Openshaw S. Developing GIS-relevant zone-based spatial analysis methods. Spatial Analysis: Modelling in a GIS Environment 1996, 55-73. Longley PBatty M. in, Geoinformation International, Cambridge, pp.
54. Openshaw S, Taylor PJ. A million or so correlation coefficients, three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem. Statistical Applications in the Spatial Science 1979, 127-144. Wrigley N, in, Pion, London, pp.
55. Ostendorf W, Musterd S, Vos S de. Social mix and the neighbourhood effect. Policy ambitions and empirical evidence. Housing Studies 2001, 16(3):371-380.
56. Overman HG. Neighbourhood effects in large and small neighbourhoods. Urban Studies 2002, 39(1):117-130.
57. Palander C. Områdesbaserad politik för minskad segregation. En studie av den svenska storstadspolitiken. Geografiska regionstudier 66 2006, Department of Social and Economic Geography, Uppsala University, Uppsala
58. Roberts JK, Monaco JP. Effect size measures for the two-level linear multilevel model. 2006, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, 7-11 April
59. Sampson RJ, Morenoff JD, Gannon-Rowley T. Assessing " neighbourhood effects": social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology 2002, 28:443-478.
60. Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling 1999, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
61. Storstad i rörelse. Kunskapsöversikt över utvärderingar av storstadspolitikens lokala utvecklingsavtal. Statens Offentliga Utredningar 2005:29 2005, SOU, Fritzes Offentliga Publikationer, Stockholm
62. Suttles GD. The Social Construction of Communities 1973, University of Chicago Press, Chicago
63. Unwin DJ. GIS, spatial analysis and spatial statistics. Progress in Human Geography 1996, 20(4):540-551.
64. Urban S. Att ordna staden. Den nya stor stadspolitiken växer fram 2005, Arkiv, Lund
65. Wilson WJ. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy 1987, University of Chicago Press, Chicago