Visual influences on alignment to voice onset time

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 262-272

  Sanchez, Kauyumari ^a   Miller, Rachel M ^a   Rosenblum, Lawrence D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Alignment; Audiovisual stimuli; Lipreading; Speech

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; LIP READING; PHOTOSTIMULATION; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME; VIDEORECORDING; VISION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIPREADING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; TIME FACTORS; VIDEO RECORDING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77950797988     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0247)     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allen, S. J., & Miller, J. L. (2001). Contextual influences on the internal structure of phonetic categories: A distinction between lexical status and speaking rate. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 798-810.
2. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2008). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.0.32) [Computer program]. Retrieved January 2008 from www.praat.org/.
3. Brancazio, L., & Miller, J. L. (2005). Use of visual information in speech perception: Evidence for a visual rate effect both with and without a McGurk effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 759-769. (Pubitemid 41649933)
4. Brancazio, L., Miller, J. L., & Paré, M. A. (2003). Visual influences on the internal structure of phonetic categories. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 591-601. (Pubitemid 37544864)
5. Calvert, G. A., Bullmore, E., Brammer, M. J., Campbell, R., Iversen, S. D., Woodruff, P., et al. (1997). Silent lipreading activates the auditory cortex. Science, 276, 593-596. (Pubitemid 27193683)
6. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893-910.
7. Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M.,&Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
8. Fowler, C. A. (2004). Speech as a supermodal or amodal phenomenon. In G. A. Calvert, C. Spence, & B. E. Stein (Eds.), The handbook of multisensory processing (pp. 189-201). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Fowler, C. A., Brown, J. M., Sabadini, L., & Weihing, J. (2003). Rapid access to speech gestures in perception:Evidence from choice and simple response time tasks. Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 396-413. (Pubitemid 37170144)
10. Gentilucci, M., & Bernardis, P. (2007). Imitation during phoneme production. Neuropsychologia, 45, 608-615. (Pubitemid 44894465)
11. Giles, H., Coupland, J., & Coupland, N. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context and consequences. In H. Giles, J. Coupland, & N. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 1-68). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
12. Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251-279.
13. Green, K. P. (1998). The use of auditory and visual information during phonetic processing: Implications for theories of speech perception. In R. Campbell & B. Dodd (Eds.), Hearing by eye II: Advances in the psychology of speechreading and auditory-visual speech (pp. 3-25). London: Erlbaum.
14. Green, K. P., & Miller, J. L. (1985). On the role of visual rate information in phonetic perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 269-276.
15. HairerSoft. (2008). Amadeus II [Sound editing software]. Retrieved January 2008 from www.hairersoft.com.
16. Hintzman, D. L. (1986). "Schema abstraction" in a multipletrace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428.
17. Keating, P. A. (1984). Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language, 60, 286-319.
18. Massaro, D. W. (1998). Speech as pattern recognition. In S. E. Palmer (Ed.), Perceiving talking faces (pp. 35-69). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Miller, J. L., Dexter, E. R., & Pickard, K. A. (1984). Influence of speaking rate and lexical status on word identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, S89.
20. Miller, R. M., Sanchez, K., & Rosenblum, L. D. (in press). Phonetic alignment to visual speech. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics.
21. Munhall, K., & Vatikiotis-Bateson, E. (2004). Spatial and temporal constraints on audiovisual speech perception. In G. A. Calvert, C. Spence, & B. E. Stein (Eds.), The handbook of multisensory processes (pp. 177-188). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Musacchia, G., Sams, M., Nicol, T., & Kraus, N. (2005). Seeing speech affects acoustic information processing in the human brainstem. Experimental Brain Research, 168, 1-10. (Pubitemid 41752806)
23. Namy, L. L., Nygaard, L. C.,& Sauerteig, D. (2002). Gender difference in vocal accommodation: The role of perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21, 422-432.
24. Nielsen, K. Y. (2008). Word-level and feature-level effects in phonetic imitation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
25. Nygaard, L. C. (2005). The integration of linguistic and nonlinguistic properties of speech. In D. Pisoni & R. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 390-414). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
26. Pardo, J. S. (2006). On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 2382-2393.
27. Pardo, J. S.,&Remez, R. E. (2006). The perception of speech. In M. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 201-248). New York: Academic Press.
28. Rosenblum, L. D. (2005). The primacy of multimodal speech perception. In D. Pisoni & R. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 51-78). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
29. Rosenblum, L. D. (2008). Speech perception as a multimodal phenomenon. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 405-409.
30. Rosenblum, L. D., Miller, R. M., & Sanchez, K. (2007). Lipread me now, hear me better later: Cross-modal transfer of talker-familiarity effects. Psychological Science, 18, 392-396.
31. Sheffert, S. M., & Fowler, C. A. (1995). The effects of voice and visible speaker change on memory for spoken words. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 665-685.
32. Shockley, K., Sabadini, L., & Fowler, C. A. (2004). Imitation in shadowing words. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 422-429. (Pubitemid 39047282)
33. Summerfield, Q. (1981). Articulatory rate and perceptual constancy in phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception&Performance, 7, 1074-1095.
34. Whiteside, S. P., Henry, L., & Dobbin, R. (2004). Sex differences in voice onset time: A developmental study of phonetic context effects in British English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 1179-1183. (Pubitemid 39063206)