Visual influences on the internal structure of phonetic categories

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 591-601

  Brancazio, Lawrence ^a,b   Miller, Joanne L ^a   Paré, Matthew A ^a  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; RANDOMIZATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME; VISION; VOICE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOICE;

EID: 0038117701     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194585     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ALLEN, J. S., & MILLER, J. L. (2001). Contextual influences on the internal structure of phonetic categories: A distinction between lexical status and speaking rate. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 798-810.
2. BRANCAZIO, L. (2003). Lexical influences in audiovisual speech perception. Manuscript submitted for publication.
3. BRANCAZIO, L., MILLER, J. L., & PARÉ, M. A. (1999). Perceptual effects of place of articulation on voicing for audiovisually discrepant stimuli [Abstract]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2270.
4. CARNEY, A. E., CLEMENT, B. R., & CIENKOWSKI, K. M. (1999). Talker variability effects in auditory-visual speech perception [Abstract]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2270.
5. COHEN, J., MACWHINNEY, B., FLATT, M., & PROVOST, J. (1993). PsyScOpe: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
6. FOWLER, C. A., BROWN, J. M., & MANN, V. A. (2000). Contrast effects do not underlie effects of preceding liquids on stop-consonant identification by humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 877-888.
7. GANONG, W. F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 6, 110-125.
8. GREEN, K. P., & KUHL, P. K. (1989). The role of visual information in the processing of place and manner features in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 34-42.
9. GREEN, K. P., & MILLER, J. L. (1985). On the role of visual rate information in phonetic perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 269-276.
10. GREEN, K. P., & NORRIX, L. W. (1997). Acoustic cues to place of articulation and the McGurk effect: The role of release bursts, aspiration, and formant transitions. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 40, 646-665.
11. GREEN, K. P., & NORRIX, L. W. (2001). Perception of /r/ and /l/ in a stop cluster: Evidence of cross-modal context effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 166-177.
12. HODGSON, P., & MILLER, J. L. (1996). Internal structure of phonetic categories: Evidence for within-category trading relations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 565-576.
13. KUHL, P. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a "perceptual magnet effect" for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 93-107.
14. LISKER, L., & ABRAMSON, A. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384-422.
15. LISKER, L., & ABRAMSON, A. S. (1970). The voicing dimension: Some experiments in comparative phonetics. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 563-567). Prague: Academia.
16. MACDONALD, J., & McGURK, H. (1978). Visual influences on speech perception processes. Perception & Psychophysics, 24, 253-257.
17. MANN, V. A. (1980). Influence of preceding liquid on stop-consonant perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 407-412.
18. MASSARO, D. W. (1987). Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for scientific inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. MASSARO, D. W. (1998). Perceiving talking faces: From speech perception to a behavioral principle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. McGURK, H., & MACDONALD, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
21. MILLER, J. L. (1994). On the internal structure of phonetic categories: A progress report. Cognition, 50, 271-285.
22. MILLER, J. L., & DEXTER, E. R. (1988). Effects of speaking rate and lexical status on phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 369-378.
23. MILLER, J. L., O'ROURKE, T. B., & VOLAITIS, L. E. (1997). Internal structure of phonetic categories: Effects of speaking rate. Phonetica, 54, 121-137.
24. MILLER, J. L., & VOLAITIS, L. E. (1989). Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 505-512.
25. PITT, M. A. (1995). The locus of the lexical shift in phoneme identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1-16.
26. REPP, B. H., & LIBERMAN, A. M. (1987). Phonetic category boundaries are flexible. In S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception: The ground-work of cognition (pp. 89-112). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. ROBERTS, M., & SUMMERFIELD, Q. (1981). Audiovisual presentation demonstrates that selective adaptation in speech perception is purely auditory. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 309-314.
28. SALDAÑA, H. M., & ROSENBLUM, L. D. (1994). Selective adaptation in speech perception using a compelling audiovisual adaptor. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 3658-3661.
29. SAMUEL, A. G. (1982). Phonetic prototypes. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 307-314.
30. SUMMERFIELD, Q. (1981). Articulatory rate and perceptual constancy in phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 1074-1095.
31. VOLAITIS, L. E., & MILLER, J. L. (1992). Phonetic prototypes: Influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 723-735.
32. WAYLAND, S. C., MILLER, J. L., & VOLAITIS, L. E. (1994). The influence of sentential speaking rate on the internal structure of phonetic categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 2694-2701.