Developing the "good citizen": Digital artifacts, peer networks, and formal organization during the 2003-2004 howard dean campaign

Journal of Information Technology and Politics

Volumn 6, Issue 3-4, 2009, Pages 281-297

  Kreiss, Daniel ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Actor network theory; Campaigns; Democracy; Internet; Open source politics; Organizations; Peer production

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950780692     PISSN: 19331681     EISSN: 1933169X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19331680903035441     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Agre, P. E. (2002). Real-time politics: The Internet and the political process. The Information Society, 18, 311-331.
2. Andrejevic, M. (2004). Little Brother is watching: The Webcam subculture and the digital enclosure. In: N. Couldry & A. McCarthy (Eds.), MediaSpace: Place, scale, and culture in a media age (pp. 193-208). New York: Routledge.
3. Armstrong, J. (2006, June 29). The journey with Trippi, Dean, and DFA. MyDD. Retrieved December 12, 2008, from http://www.mydd.com/story/2006/6/29/12475/7402.
4. Armstrong, J. (2007). How a blogger and the Dean campaign discovered each other. In T. Streeter & Z. Teachout (Eds.), Mousepads, shoe leather, and hope: Lessons from the Howard Dean campaign for the future of Internet politics (pp. 38-54). Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
5. Barry, A. (2000, September). Making the active scientific citizen. Paper presented at the 4S/EASST conference, "Technoscience, Citizenship and Culture," University of Vienna, Austria. Retrieved December 12, 2008, from http://www.goldsmiths.ac.uk/csisp/papers/barry_active_scientific_citizen.pdf.
6. Barry, A. (2001). Political machines: Governing a technological society. New York: Athlone Press.
7. Barry, A., Osborne, T., & Rose, N. (Eds.). (1996). Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism, and rationalities of government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Benkler, Y. (2002). Coase's penguin, or, Linux and the nature of the firm. The Yale Law Journal, 112(3), 369-446.
9. Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How production networks transform markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10. Benson, J. (2004, January 29). Dean goes bust: The $40 million war chest is gone-and so is campaign manager Joe Trippi. What happened? Salon. Retrieved December 12, 2006, from http://archive.salon.com/news/feature/2004/01/29/dean/index.html.
11. Biddle, L. (2007). Hitting home runs on and off the Internet. In T. Streeter & Z. Teachout (Eds.), Mousepads, shoe leather, and hope: Lessons from the Howard Dean campaign for the future of Internet politics (pp. 166-178). Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
12. Bimber, B. (2003). Information and American democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Bimber, B., & Davis, R. (2003). Campaigning online: The Internet in U.S. elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Bimber, B., Flanagin, A., & Stohl, C. (2005). Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory, 15(4), 365-388.
15. Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. New York: Verso.
16. Burchell, G. (1996). Liberal government and techniques of the self. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism, and rationalities of government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196-223). London: Routledge.
18. Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counterpower in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1, 238-266.
19. Chadwick, A. (2007). Digital network repertoires and organizational hybridity. Political Communication, 24, 283-301.
20. Chadwick, A. (2009). Web 2.0: New challenges for the study of democracy in an era of informational exuberance. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 5(1), 9-41.
21. Clark, B. (2007). Swept up in "the perfect storm." In T. Streeter & Z. Teachout (Eds.), Mousepads, shoe leather, and hope: Lessons from the Howard Dean campaign for the future of Internet politics (pp. 74-85). Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
22. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 6(4), 422-435.
23. Dean for America. (2003). Dean For America: June Meetup hosts. Retrieved Debember 12, 2008, from http://web.archive.org/web/20030608150124/www.deanforamerica.com/site/PageServer?pagename=junemeetuphosts.
24. Foot, K. A., & Schneider, S. M. (2006). Web campaigning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. George Washington University (2004). Howard Dean campaign organization. Retrieved July 10, 2008, from http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2004/dean/deanorg.html.
26. Gusfield, J. R. (1981). Social movements and social change: Perspectives of linearity and fluidity. In L. Kriesberg (Ed.), Research in Social Movements, Conflict and Change. Vol. 4, (pp. 317-339). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
27. Haas, G. A. (2006). Subject to the system: The rhetorical constitution of good Internet citizenship in the 2004 U.S. presidential campaign. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
28. Heckscher, C., & Donnellon, A. (Eds.). (1994). The postbureaucratic organization: New perspectives on organizational change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
29. Hindman, M. (2005). The real lessons of Howard Dean: Reflections on the first digital campaign. Perspectives on Politics, 3(1), 121-128.
30. Hindman, M. (2007). "Open-source politics" reconsidered: Emerging patterns in online political participation. In V. Mayer-Schönberger & D. Lazer (Eds.), Governance and Information Technology (pp. 183-211). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
31. Hindman, M. (2008). The myth of digital democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. Howard, P. N. (2006). New media campaigns and the managed citizen. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture. New York: New York University Press.
34. Jett, Q. R., & Välikangas, L. (2004). The gamble of open organizing. Retrieved May 15, 2008, from http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/digital/Research/Academic-Publications/OpenOrganizing.pdf.
35. Justice, G. (2004, February 1). The 2004 campaign: The former governor; report shows Dean campaign spent $31.7 million in 2003. The New York Times. Retrieved November 21, 2008, from http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9400E0DE163BF932A35751C0A9629C8B63.
36. Koenig, J. (2007). Participatory political culture: Everyone's a kingpin if he or she wants to be. In T. Streeter & Z. Teachout (Eds.), Mousepads, shoe leather, and hope: Lessons from the Howard Dean campaign for the future of Internet politics (pp. 201-211). Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
37. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
39. Latour, B., & Weibel, P. (Eds.). (2005). Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Law, J., & Hassard, J. (Eds.). (1999). Actor network theory and after. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
41. Lebkowsky, J. (2005). Deanspace, social networks, and politics. In J. Lebkowsky & M. Ratcliffe (Eds.), Extreme Democracy (pp. 206-310). Retrieved December 12, 2008, from http://www.lulu.com/content/125298.
42. Lessig, L. (2003, November 11). The new road to the White House: How grassroots blogs are transforming presidential politics. Wired. Retrieved July 10, 2008, from http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.11/view.html?pg=5.
43. Michel, A. (2007). The lessons of generation Dean. In T. Streeter & Z. Teachout (Eds.), Mousepads, shoe leather, and hope: Lessons from the Howard Dean campaign for the future of Internet politics (pp. 147-165). Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
44. Neff, G., & Stark, D. (2003). Permanently beta: Responsive organization in the Internet era. In P. N. Howard & S. Jones (Eds.), Society online: The Internet in context (pp. 173-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
45. Nuxoll, K. (2007). E-mail: Sign your own name. In T. Streeter & Z. Teachout (Eds.), Mousepads, shoe leather, and hope: Lessons from the Howard Dean campaign for the future of Internet politics (pp. 192-200). Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
46. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Podolny, J., & Page, K. L. (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 57-76.
48. Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither markets nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295-336.
49. Rose, N. S. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50. Scholz, T. (2008). Market ideology and the myths of Web 2.0. First Monday, 13(3). Retrieved from http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2138/1945.
51. Schudson, M. (1998). The good citizen: A history of American civic life. New York: The Free Press.
52. Silberman, M. (2007). The Meetup story. In T. Streeter & Z. Teachout (Eds.), Mousepads, shoe leather, and hope: Lessons from the Howard Dean campaign for the future of Internet politics (pp. 110-129). Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
53. Staggenborg, S. (1988). Consequences of professionalization and formalization in the pro-choice movement. American Sociological Review, 53, 585-606.
54. Streeter, T., & Teachout, Z. (Eds.). (2007). Mousepads, shoe leather, and hope: Lessons from the Howard Dean campaign for the future of Internet politics. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
55. Stromer-Galley, J. (2004). Interactivity-as-product and interactivity-as-process. The Information Society, 20(5), 391-394.
56. Stromer-Galley, J., & Baker, A. B. (2006). Joy and sorrow of interactivity on the campaign trail: Blogs in the primary campaign of Howard Dean. In J. C. Tedesco (Ed.), The Internet Election: Perspectives on the Web in Campaign 2004 (pp. 111-131). New York: Rowan and Littlefield, Inc.
57. Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
58. Taylor, V. (1989). The future of feminism: A social movement analysis. In L. Richardson & V. Taylor (Eds.), Feminist Frontiers II (pp. 474-490). New York: Random House.
59. Teachout, Z. (2007). Something much bigger than a candidate. In T. Streeter & Z. Teachout (Eds.), Mousepads, shoe leather, and hope: Lessons from the Howard Dean campaign for the future of Internet politics (pp. 55-73). Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
60. Terranova, T. (2004). Network culture: Politics for the Information Age. Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.
61. Trippi, J. (2003, May 17). The perfect storm. Retrieved May 15, 2008, from http://joetrippi.com/?page_id=1378.
62. Trippi, J. (2004). The revolution will not be televised: Democracy, the Internet, and the overthrow of everything. New York: Harper Collins.
63. Trippi, J. (2005). Foreword. In M. Ratcliffe & J. Lebkowsky (Eds.), Extreme Democracy (pp. 6-14). Retrieved May 15, 2008, from http://www.lulu.com/content/125298.
64. Wiese, D. R., & Gronbeck, B. E. (2005). Campaign 2004 developments in cyberpolitics. In R. E. Denton, Jr. (Ed.), The 2004 presidential campaign: A communication perspective (pp. 217-240). New York: Rowman and Littlefield, Inc.
65. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press.
66. Wittel, A. (2001). Toward a network sociality. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(6), 51-76.
67. Wolf, G. (2004, January 12). How the Internet invented Howard Dean. Wired. Retrieved July 10, 2008, from http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.01/dean.html.