Response to Pattison: Whose Responsibility to Protect?

Journal of Military Ethics

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 79-85

  Roff, H M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Consequentialist; Duty; Humanitarian intervention; Kant; Pattison

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950780265     PISSN: 15027570     EISSN: 15027589     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15027570902805190     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bagnoli, C. (2006) Humanitarian Intervention as a Perfect Duty: A Kantian Argument, in: T. Nardin & M. Williams (Eds), NOMOS XLVII: Humanitarian Intervention, pp. 117-140 (New York: New York University Press).
2. Glanville, L. (2005) Somalia Reconsidered: An Examination of the Norm of Humanitarian Intervention, Journal of Humanitarian Assistance [journal on-line], accessed 23 January 2009, available at http:// wwwjha.ac/articles/a178.pdf; Internet.
3. Kant, I. ([1785] 1993) Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals (Indianapolis: Hackett).
4. Kant, I. ([1797] 2006) The Metaphysics of Morals (New York: Cambridge University Press).
5. Pattison, J. (2008a) Whose Responsibility to Protect? The Duties of Humanitarian Intervention, Journal of Military Ethics, 7(4), pp. 262-283.
6. Pattison, J. (2008b) Legitimacy and Humanitarian Intervention: Who Should Intervene?, The International Journal of Human Rights, 12(3), pp. 395-413.
7. Philips, M. (2003) Humanitarian Intervention and Moral Theory, in: A. Jokic (Ed.), Humanitarian Intervention: Moral and Philosophical Issues, pp. 71-93 (Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press).
8. Tan, K. (2006) The Duty to Protect, in: T. Nardin & M. Williams (Eds), NOMOS XLVII: Humanitarian Intervention, pp. 84-116 (New York: New York University Press).
9. United States Army (2006) The United States in Somalia 1992-1994, CMH Pub 70-81-1 [pamphlet on-line] (Washington, D.C.: United States Army Center of Military History), accessed 27 January 2009, available at http://www.history.army.mil/brochures/Somalia/Somalia.htm#p26; Internet.