Data credibility: A perspective from systematic reviews in environmental management

New Directions for Evaluation

Volumn 2009, Issue 122, 2009, Pages 65-74

  Pullin, Andrew S ^a   Knight, Teri M ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950742454     PISSN: 10976736     EISSN: 1534875X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ev.296     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Donaldson, S. I., and Christie, C. A., (2005).The 2004 Claremont Debate: Lipsey vs. Scriven-Determining causality in program evaluation and applied research: Should experimental evidence be the gold standard?Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 3, 60-77.
2. Ferraro, P. J., and Pattanayak, S. K., (2006).Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments.PloS Biology, 4, 482-488.
3. Gee, D., (2008).Establishing evidence for early action: The prevention of reproductive and developmental harm.Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, 102, 257-266.
4. Guba, E. G., and Lincoln, Y. S., (1989).Fourth generation evaluation.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Julnes, G., &Rog, D. J. (Eds.) (2007).Informing federal policies on evaluation methodology: Building the evidence base for method choice in government sponsored evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 113.
6. Margoluis, R., and Salafsky, N., (1998).Measures of success: Designing, managing and monitoring conservation and development projects.University of Michigan: Island Press.
7. Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M., (1994).Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.).London: Sage.
8. Newton, A. C., Stewart, G. B., Diaz, A., Golicher, D., and Pullin, A. S., (2007).Bayesian belief networks as a tool for evidence-based conservation management.Journal for Nature Conservation, 15, 144-160.
9. Pawson, R., and Tilley, N., (1997).Realistic evaluation.London: Sage.
10. Pullin, A. S., and Knight, T. M., (2001).Effectiveness in conservation practice: Pointers from medicine and public health.Conservation Biology, 15, 50-54.
11. Pullin, A. S., and Knight, T. M., (2003).Support for decision making in conservation practice: An evidence-based approach.Journal for Nature Conservation, 11, 83-90.
12. Pullin, A. S., and Stewart, G. B., (2006).Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management.Conservation Biology, 20, 1647-1656.
13. Stevens, A., and Milne, R., (1997).The effectiveness revolution and public health. In G. Scally (Ed.), Progress in public health (pp. 197-225).London: Royal Society for Medicine Press.
14. Stewart, G. B., Bayliss, H. R., Showler, D. A., Sutherland, W. J., and Pullin, A. S., (2009).Effectiveness of engineered in-stream structure mitigation measures for increasing salmonid abundance: A systematic review.Ecological Applications, 19, 931-941.
15. Stewart, G. B., Coles, C. F., and Pullin, A. S., (2005).Applying evidence-based practice in conservation management: Lessons from the first systematic review and dissemination projects.Biological Conservation, 126, 270-278.
16. Stewart, G. B., Côté, I. M., Kaiser, M. J., Halpern, B. S., Lester, S. E., Bayliss, H. R., et al.(2008) Are marine protected areas effective tools for sustainable fisheries management? I. Biodiversity impact of marine reserves in temperate zones. Systematic Review No. 23. Retrieved April 22, 2009, from http://www.environmentalevidence.org.
17. Stewart, G. B., Pullin, A. S., and Tyler, C., (2007).The effectiveness of asulam for bracken (Pteridium aquilinum) control in the United Kingdom: A meta-analysis.Environmental Management, 40, 747-760.
18. Sutherland, W. J., Pullin, A. S., Dolman, P. M., and Knight, T. M., (2004).The need for evidence-based conservation.Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 305-308.
19. Tyler, C., Pullin, A. S., and Stewart, G. B., (2006).Effectiveness of management interventions to control invasion by Rhododendron ponticum.Environmental Management, 37, 513-522.