Establishing evidence for early action: The prevention of reproductive and developmental harm

Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 257-266

  Gee, David ^a  

^a EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT AGENCY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER CYTODIAGNOSIS; CANCER PREVENTION; CANCER RISK; CHEMICAL CARCINOGENESIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE SURVEILLANCE; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; HARM REDUCTION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CARCINOMA; REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ANIMALS; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; HUMANS; POLICY MAKING; PUBLIC POLICY; REPRODUCTION; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 38449119536     PISSN: 17427835     EISSN: 17427843     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2008.00207.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (53)

1. European Commission. Weybridge Report, European Workshop on the Impact of Endocrine Disrupters on Human Health and Wildlife. European Commission, EUR 17549, Brussels, Belgium, 1997.
2. World Health Organization/International Programme on Chemical Safety. Global Assessment of the State-of-the-Science of Endocrine Disruptors. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2002, http://www.who.int/ipcs/publications/new_issues/ endocrine_disruptors/en/
3. Segner H. Developmental, reproductive, and demographic alterations in aquatic wildlife: establishing causality between exposure to endocrine-active compounds (EACs) and effects. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol 2005 33 : 17 26.
4. CREDO http://www.credocluster.info.
5. Schwartz DA, Korach KS. Emerging research on endocrine disruptors, NIEHS director's perspective. Environ Health Perspect 2007 115 : A13.
6. EDEN Endocrine Research, The Prague Declaration 2006, http://www.edenresearch.info/declaration.
7. Skakkebæk NE, Andersson AM. Endocrine Disrupters and Consumer products: Possible Effects on Human Populations. Abstracts from the 4th Copenhagen Workshop on Endocrine Disrupters, University Department of Growth and Reproduction, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2007.
8. The Faroes Statement: Human Health Effects of Developmental Exposure to Chemicals in Our Environment. Tórshavn, Faroe Islands, Thursday, 24 May 2007. Basic Clin Pharm Toxicol 2008 102 : 73 75.
9. Thalidomide Victims Association of Canada, 'The History of Thalidomide', Dr. Widukind Lenz. http://www.thalidomide.ca/en/information/ history_of_thalidomide.html/ 2007.
10. Dubos R. Man Adapting. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1965 164 65.
11. Duncan DF. Epidemiology. Macmillan, New York, 1988.
12. Sing CF, Stengard JH, Kardi SLR. Dynamic relationships between the genome and exposures to environments as causes of common human diseases. In : Simopoulos AP, Ordovas JM (eds). Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics World Review of Nutrition and Diet. Karger, Basel, Switzerland, 2004 77 91.
13. Rosen G. A History of Public Health. JHU Press, New York, 1958.
14. Gordon D. Tenacious assumptions in Western medicine. In : Lock M, Gordon D (eds). Biomedicine Examined. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1988.
15. Baird PA. Identification of Genetic Susceptibility to Common Diseases: the case for regulation. Perspect Biol Med 2002 45 : 516 28.
16. Rothman KJ. Introduction to Epidemiology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2002.
17. Collins FF, Green ED, Guttmacher AE, Guyer MS. A vision for the future of genomics research. Nature 2003 422 : 835 47.
18. Edwards TM, Myers JP. Environmental exposures and gene regulation in disease etiology. Environ Health Perspect 2007 115 : 1264 70.
19. Hopkins PN, Williams RR. A survey of 246 suggested coronary risk factors. Atherosclerosis 1981 40 : 1 52.
20. Weinstein B. Addiction to oncogenes - the achilles heal of cancer. Science 2002 297 : 63 4.
21. Dean K. Integrating theory and methods in population health research. In : Dean K (ed.). Population Health Research: Linking Theory and Methods. SAGE Publications, London, 1993.
22. Soto AM, Sonnenschein C. Emergentism as a default: cancer as a problem of tissue organisation. Bioscience 2005 30 : 101 16.
23. Gee D. Late lessons from early warnings: towards realism and precaution with endocrine disrupting substances. Environ Health Perspect 2006 114 : 152 60.
24. May R. Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature 1970 261 : 459 67.
25. Khaimovich L. Recent Developments in Nonlinear Dynamics: Unfolding the Meaning of Sociologically Relevant Concepts. Paper prepared for the 1992 American Statistical Association Meeting, 1992.
26. Di Guiliio RT, Benson WH. Interconnections between Human Health and Ecological Integrity. SETAC Press, Brussels, Belgium, 2002.
27. Guba G, Lincoln YS. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, 1989.
28. Cory-Slechta D. Studying toxicants as single chemicals: does this strategy adequately identify neurotoxic risk? Neurotoxicology 2005 26 : 491 510.
29. Weiss B, Bellinger DC. Social ecology of children's vulnerability to environmental pollutants. Environ Health Perspect 2006 114 : 1479 85.
30. Bellinger D. Lead neurotoxicity in children: decomposing the variability in dose-effect relationships. Am J Ind Med 2007 50 : 720 8.
31. Rauh VA, Parker FL, Garfinkel RS. Biological, social, and community influences on third-grade reading levels of minority Head start children: a multilevel approach. J Comp Psychol 2003 31 : 255 78.
32. Soto AM, Sonnenschein C. Emergentism by default: a view from the bench. Synthese 2006 151 : 361 76.
33. Newman MC. Population Ecotoxicology. Wiley & Son, Chichester, UK, 2001.
34. Kidd AK, Blanchfield PJ, Mills KH et al. Collapse of a Fish Population after Exposure to a Synthetic Estrogen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/ 21 May 2007.
35. Bellinger D, Leviton A, Waternaux C, Allred E. Methodological issues in modelling the relationship between low-level lead exposure and infant development: examples from the Boston lead study. Environ Res 1985 38 : 119 29.
36. McMichael AJ. Prisoners of the proximate: loosening the constraints on epidemiology in an age of change. Am J Epidemiol 1999 149 : 887 8.
37. Hill B. Environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med 1965 58 : 295 300.
38. Ashby J, Houthoff E, Kennedy SJ et al. The challenge posed by endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Environ Health Perspect 1997 105 : 164 9.
39. European Environmental Agency. Association and Causation: the Bradford Hill Criteria Revisited. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark, in press.
40. Needleman H. Making models of real world events: the use and abuse of inference. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1995 17 : 241 2.
41. Bailar J. How to distort the scientific record without actually lying: truth and the arts of science. Eur J Oncol 2007 11 : 217 24.
42. Grosse Y, Baan R, Straif K et al. Carcinogenicity of 1,3-butadiene, ethylene oxide, vinyl chloride, vinyl fluoride, and vinyl bromide. Lancet Oncol 2007 8 : 679 80. http://oncology.thelancet.com 29 September 2007.
43. Poole, C. Low P-values or narrow confidence intervals: which are more durable? Epidemiology 2000 12 : 291 4.
44. European Environmental Agency. Late Lessons from Early Warnings: the Precautionary Principle 1896-2000. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2001.
45. Grandjean P. Underestimation of risk due to exposure misclassification. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2004 17 : 131 6.
46. Grandjean P. Non-precautionary aspects of toxicology. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2005 207 : 652 7.
47. Weed DL. Precaution, prevention and public health ethics. J Med Philos 2004 29 : 313 32.
48. Case T-13/99, Pfizer Animal Health v. Council, 2002, ECRII-3305.
49. World Health Organisation. Effects of Air Pollution on Children's Health and Development. A Review of the Evidence. WHO, European Office, Bonn, Germany, 2005.
50. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for policy makers. Climate Change: the Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the 4th Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2007.
51. Weed, DL. Weight of evidence: a review of concept and methods. Risk Anal 2005 25 : 1545 57.
52. Neutra R, DelPizzo P, Geraldine M. An evaluation of the possible risks from electric and magnetic fields (EMFs) from power lines, internal wiring, electrical occupations, and appliances. California EMF Programme, Oakland, CA, 2002.
53. Orrell D. The Future of everything: the Science of Prediction. Lewontin in Thunder's Mouth Press, New York, 2007 379.