Evaluating a cross-continent EU simulation

Journal of Political Science Education

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 404-434

  Jones, Rebecca ^a  

^a WIDENER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Evaluation; Learning outcomes; Simulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950727753     PISSN: 15512169     EISSN: 15512177     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15512160802413790     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Boud, David and Nancy Falchikov. 1989. ‘Quantitative Studies of Student Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Critical Analysis of Findings.'' Higher Education 18(5): 529-549.
2. Ciliotta-Rubery, Andrea and Dena Levy. 2000. ‘Congressional Committee Simulation: An Active Learning Experiment.'' PS: Political Science & Politics 33(4): 847-851.
3. Cruickshank, D. R. and Ross Telfer. 1980. ‘Classroom Games and Simulations.'' Theory into Practice 19(l): 75-80.
4. Dorn, Dean S. 1989. ‘Simulation games: One More Tool on the Pedagogical Shelf.'' Teaching Sociology 17(1): 147-151.
5. Dougherty, Beth K. 2003. ‘Byzantine Politics: Using Simulations to Make Sense of the Middle East.'' PS: Political Science & Politics 36(2): 239-244.
6. Galatas, Steven E. 2006. ‘A Simulation of the Council of the European Union: Assessment of the Impact on Student Learning.'' PS: Political Science & Politics 39(1): 147-151.
7. Greenblat, Catherine S. 1973. ‘Teaching with Simulation Games: A Review of Claims and Evidence.'' Teaching Sociology 1(l): 62-83.
8. Ip, Albert and Roni Linser. 2001. ‘Evaluation of a Role-Play Simulation in Political Science.'' The Technology Source, http://ts.mivu.org.
9. Kaarbo, Juliet and Jeffrey S. Lands. 1997. ‘Coalition Theory in Praxis: A Comparative Politics Simulation of the Cabinet Formation Process.'' PS: Political Science & Politics 30(3): 501-506.
10. Shellman, Stephen M. 2001. ‘Active Learning in Comparative Politics: A Mock German Election and Coalition-Formation Simulation.'' PS: Political Science & Politics 34(4): 827-834.
11. Smith, Elizabeth T. and Mark A. Boyer. 1996. ‘Designing In-Class Simulations.'' PS: Political Science & Politics 29(4): 690-694.
12. Steck, Henry, Laurie Buonanno, and Munroe Eagles. 1996. ‘Pedagogical Strategies and Assessment Results in Cross-National Simulations: Conclusions from a Two-Continent Model EU Simulation.'' Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting. San Francisco, California.
13. Swansbrough, Robert H. 2003. ‘Familiarity Breeds Respect toward Congress: Teams in the Classroom and Workplace.'' PS: Political Science & Politics 36(4): 769-772.
14. Szafran, Robert F. and Ann F. Mandolini. 1980. ‘Student Evaluations of a Simulation Game.'' Teaching Sociology 8(1): 21-37.
15. Topping, Keith. 1998. ‘Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities.'' Review of Educational Research 68(3): 249-276.
16. Trans-Atlantic Consortium for European Union Studies and Simulations (TACEUSS). 2005. EuroSim program goals (brochure)
17. Zeff, Eleanor E. 2003. ‘Negotiating in the European Council: A Model European Union Format for Individual Classes.'' International Studies Perspectives 4(3): 265-274.