Exploring high school students' views regarding the nature of scientific theory: A study in Taiwan

Asia-Pacific Education Researcher

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 161-177

  Wen, Meichun Lydia ^a   Kuo, Pi Chu ^b   Tsai, Chin Chung ^c   Chang, Chun Yen ^d  

^a NATIONAL CHANGHUA UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL PINGTUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^d NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Competing theories; Extinction of dinosaurs; High school; Nature of science; Scientific theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950670278     PISSN: 01195646     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3860/taper.v19i1.1515     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665-701.
2. Alvarez, L. W., Alvarez, W., Asaro, F., & Michel, H. V. (1980). Extraterrestrial cause for the cretaceous-tertiary extinction. Science, 208, 1095-1108.
3. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Becker, B. J. (1989). Gender and science achievement: A re-analysis of studies from two meta-analyses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 141-169.
5. Clough, M. P. (1995, October). Longitudinal understanding of the nature of science as facilitated by an introductory high school biology course. Paper presented at the Third International History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
6. Clough, M. P. (2000). The nature of science: Understanding how the game of science is played. The Clearing House, 74(1), 13-17.
7. Hand, B., Prain, V., & Wallace, C. (2002). Influences of writing tasks on students' answers to recall and higher-level test questions. Research in Science Education, 32, 19-34.
8. Huang, C.-M., Tsai, C.-C., & Chang, C.-Y. (2005). An investigation of Taiwanese early adolescents' views about the nature of science. Adolescence, 40(159), 645-654.
9. Kuo, P.-C. (2005). The effectiveness of an American science camp for Taiwanese high school students. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The University of Iowa, Iowa City.
10. Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331-359.
11. Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521.
12. Lederman, N. G., Wade, P. D., & Bell, R. L. (1998). Assessing understanding of the nature of science: A historical perspective. In W. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science and science education: Rationals and strategies (pp. 331-350). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
13. Liu, S.-Y., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). Taiwanese gifted students' views of nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 102(3), 114-123.
14. McLean, D. M. (1988). K-T trasition into chaos. Journal of Geological Education, 36, 237-243.
15. McComas, W. F. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 53-70). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16. McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 3-39). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
17. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
18. Reif, F. (1995). Understanding and teaching important scientific thought processes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4, 261-282.
19. Roehrig, G. H., & Luft, J. A. (2004). Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 3-24.
20. Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 387-409.
21. Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 610-645.
22. Songer, N. B., & Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students' views of science influence knowledge integration? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 761-784.
23. Tsai, C.-C. (1998a). An analysis of scientific epistemological beliefs and learning orientations of Taiwanese eight graders. Science Education, 82, 473-489.
24. Tsai, C.-C. (1998b). An analysis of Taiwanese eight graders' science achievement, scientific epistemological beliefs and cognitive structure outcomes after learning basic atomic theory. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 413-425.
25. Tsai, C.-C. (1999). The progression toward constructivist epistemological views of science: A case study of the STS instruction of Taiwanese high school female students. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 1201-1222.
26. Tsai, C.-C. (2004). Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: A phenomenographic analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1733-1750.
27. Tsai, C.-C. (2007). Teachers' scientific epistemological views: the coherence with instruction and students' views. Science Education, 91, 222-243.
28. Tsai, C.-C., & Liang, J.-C. (2009). The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: The role of scientific epistemological views. Instructional Science, 37, 293-310.
29. Tsai, C.-C., & Liu, S.-Y. (2005). Developing a multi-dimensional instrument for assessing students' epistemological views toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 27(13), 1621-1638.
30. University of California Museum of Paleontology. (2007). What killed the dinosaurs? Extinction theories. Retrieved from http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/extinctheory.html.
31. Venville, G., Rennie, L., & Wallace, J. (2004). Decision making and sources of knowledge: How students tackle integrated tasks in science, technology and mathematics. Research in Science Education, 34, 115-135.
32. Weinburgh, J. M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 32, 387-398.
33. Yang, F. Y. (2005). Student views concerning evidence and the expert in reasoning a socio-scientific issue and personal epistemology. Educational Studies, 31, 65-84.