Study of ensemble learning-based fusion prognostics

2010 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference, PHM '10

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Sun, Jianzhong ^a,c   Zuo, Hongfu ^a   Yang, Haibin ^a   Michael, Pecht ^b,c  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS   (China)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Ensemble learning; Health management; Machine learning; Neural network ensemble; Prognostics

Indexed keywords

DATA SETS; DYNAMIC WEIGHT; EMPIRICAL COMPARISON; ENGINEERING SYSTEMS; ENSEMBLE LEARNING; FAILURE PROGNOSIS; HEALTH MANAGEMENT; HYPERRECTANGLES; INDIVIDUAL MODELS; MACHINE-LEARNING; MLP NEURAL NETWORKS; MULTI LAYER PERCEPTRON NETWORKS; TEST SAMPLES; WEAK LEARNER; WEIGHT ALLOCATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEALTH; NASA; NEURAL NETWORKS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 77950667302     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/PHM.2010.5414582     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. M. Pecht. Prognostics and Health Management of Electronics, Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, 2008.
2. K. Goebel, N. Eklund, and P. Bonanni. Fusing Competing Prediction Algorithms for Prognostics, IEEE Aerospace Conf 2006.
3. S. Vittal, P. Hajela P, A. Joshi. Review of approaches to gas turbine life management, AIAA. Proceeding of 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. New York: AIAA, 2004: 1-11.
4. M. Schwabacher and K. Goebel, A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Prognostics, Working Notes of 2007AAAI Fall Symposium: AI for Prognostics, 2007.
5. K. Goebel, B. Saha, and A.Saxena, "A Comparison of Three Data-Driven Techniques for Prognostics," in 62nd Meeting of the Society For Machinery Failure Prevention Technology (MFPT), Virginia Beach, VA, pp. 191-1131, 2008.
6. K. Goebel and N. Eklund, Prognostic Fusion for Uncertainty Reduction, Proceedings of AIAA@Infotech Aerospace Conference, Reston, VA: American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc, 2007.
7. S.F. Cheng, M. Pecht, A Fusion Prognostics Method for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Electronic Products, 5th Annual IEEE Conference on Automation Science and Engineering Bangalore, India, pp. 102-107, August 22-25, 2009.
8. J. M. Bates, C. W. J. Granger, The Combination of Forecasts, Essays in econometrics: Spectral analysis, seasonality, nonlinearity, methodology, and forecasting book contents,2001, pp: 391-410.
9. L.I. Kuncheva, C.J. Whitaker. Measures of diversity in classifier ensembles. Machine Learning, 2003, 51(2): 181-207.
10. R.P.W. Duin and D.M.J. Tax, "Experiments with Classifier Combining Rules," Proc. First Int'l Workshop Multiple Classifier Systems MCS 2000, J. Kittler and F. Roli, eds., pp. 16-29, June 2000.
11. M.P. Perrone, L.N. Cooper. When networks disagree: Ensemble method for neural networks. In: R.J. Mammone, Editor, Artificial Neural Networks for Speech and Vision, Chapman & Hall, New York (1993), pp. 126-142.
12. 12. D .Opitz, J .Shavlik. Actively searching for an effective neural network ensemble. Connection Science, 1996, 8 (3- 4): 337-353. (Pubitemid 126400569)
13. F. Xue, R. Subbu, P.P. Bonissone, Locally weighted fusion of multiple predictive models, in: Proceedings of the IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence: Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Vancouver, Canada, July 16-21, 2006.
14. R.E. Schapire. The Strength of Weak Learnability [J]. Machine Learning, 1990, 5 (2): 197-227.
15. H. Drucker. Improving regressors using boosting techniques. Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on machine learning[C]. San Francisco : 1997: 107-115.
16. 16. S. Hashem, Optimal linear combinations of neural networks, Neural Networks 10 (4) (1997) 599-614. (Pubitemid 27357174)
17. D.H. Wolpert, Stacked generalization, Neural Networks 5 (1992) 241-259.
18. Z.H. Zhou, J. Wu and W. Tang, Ensembling neural networks: many could be better than all, Artif. Intell. 137 (2000) (1-2), pp. 239-263.
19. A. Saxena, K. Goebel, D. Simon and N. Eklund. Damage Propagation Modeling for Aircraft Engine Run-to-Failure Simulation, IEEE PHM'08 confrence, Denver CO, 2008.
20. L.K. Hansen, P . Salamon. Neural network ensembles. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1990, 12(10): 993-1001.
21. P. Cunningham, J. Carney, S. Jacob, Stability problems with artificial neural networks and the ensemble solution, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 20 (3) , pp.217-225, 2000.
22. S. Gutta, H. Wechsler, Face recognition using hybrid classifier systems, in: Proc. ICNN-96, Washington, DC, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1996, pp.1017-1022.
23. 23. D.W. Opitz, J.W. Shavlik, Actively searching for an effective neural network ensemble, Connection Science 8 (3-4), pp. 337-353, 1996. (Pubitemid 126400569)
24. C.J. Merz, M.J. Pazzani, Combining neural network regression estimates with regularized linear weights, in: M.C Mozer, M.I. Jordan, T. Petsche (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 9, Denver, CO, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997, pp.564-570.
25. D. Jimenez, Dynamically weighted ensemble neural networks for classification, in: Proc. IJCNN-98, vol.1, Anchorage, AK, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1998, pp.753-756.
26. Y. Freund, Boosting a weak algorithm by majority, Information and Computation 121 (2), 256-285, 1995.
27. Y. Freund, R.E. Schapire, A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting, in: Proc. EuroCOLT-94, Barcelona, Spain, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995, pp.23-37.