Planimetric measurement of the regurgitant orifice area using multidetector CT for aortic regurgitation: A comparison with the use of echocardiography

Korean Journal of Radiology

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 169-177

  Jeon, Min Hee ^a,b   Choe, Yeon Hyeon ^a   Cho, Soo Jin ^a   Park, Seung Woo ^a   Park, Pyo Won ^a   Oh, Jae K ^a,c  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Chungbuk National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Aortic regurgitation; Computed tomography (CT); Echocardiography; Planimetry

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIASTOLE; DISEASE SEVERITY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REFERENCE VALUE; RR INTERVAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTOLE; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; AREA UNDER CURVE; BODY WEIGHTS AND MEASURES; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, COLOR; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77950635548     PISSN: 12296929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2010.11.2.169     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Enriquez-Sarano M, Tajik AJ. Clinical practice. Aortic regurgita- tion. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1539-1546
2. Bekeredjian R, Grayburn PA. Valvular heart disease: aortic regurgitation. Circulation 2005;112:125-134
3. Zoghbi WA, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E, Grayburn PA, Kraft CD, Levine RA, et al. Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003;16:777-802
4. Tribouilloy CM, Enriquez-Sarano M, Bailey KR, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Assessment of severity of aortic regurgitation using the width of the vena contracta: a clinical color Doppler imaging study. Circulation 2000;102:558-564
5. Eren M, Eksik A, Gorgulu S, Norgaz T, Dagdeviren B, Bolca O, et al. Determination of vena contracta and its value in evaluat- ing severity of aortic regurgitation. J Heart Valve Dis 2002;11:567-575
6. Mascherbauer J, Rosenhek R, Bittner B, Binder J, Simon P, Maurer G, et al. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of valvular regurgitation severity by measurement of the vena contracta: an in vitro validation study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005;18:999-1006
7. Fang L, Hsiung MC, Miller AP, Nanda NC, Yin WH, Young MS, et al. Assessment of aortic regurgitation by live three- dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic measurements of vena contracta area: usefulness and validation. Echocardiography 2005;22:775-781
8. Mizushige K, Nozaki S, Ohmori K, Matsuo H. Evaluation of effective aortic regurgitant orifice area and its effect on aortic regurgitant volume with Doppler echocardiography. Angiology 2000;51:241-246
9. Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Bettex DA, Plass A, Baumert B, Leschka S, et al. Mitral regurgitation: quantification with 16- detector row CT-initial experience. Radiology 2006;238:454-463.
10. Gilkeson RC, Markowitz AH, Balgude A, Sachs PB. MDCT evaluation of aortic valvular disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:350-360
11. Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Plass A, Bettex D, Baumert B, Leschka S, et al. Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16- detector row CT and echocardiography. Radiology 2006;240:47-55
12. Habis M, Daoud B, Roger VL, Ghostine S, Caussin C, Ramadan R, et al. Comparison of 64-slice computed tomography planime- try and Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of aortic valve stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis 2007;16:216-224
13. Feuchtner GM, Müller S, Bonatti J, Schachner T, Velik-Salchner C, Pachinger O, et al. Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:197-203
14. Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Pasquet A, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL. Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transtho- racic and transesophageal echocardiography. Radiology 2007;244:745-754
15. Vogel-Claussen J, Pannu H, Spevak PJ, Fishman EK, Bluemke DA. Cardiac valve assessment with MR imaging and 64-section multi-detector row CT. Radiographics 2006;26:1769-1784
16. Ryan R, Abbara S, Colen RR, Arnous S, Quinn M, Cury RC, et al. Cardiac valve disease: spectrum of findings on cardiac 64- MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:W294-W303
17. Alkadhi H, Desbiolles L, Husmann L, Plass A, Leschka S, Scheffel H, et al. Aortic regurgitation: assessment with 64- section CT. Radiology 2007;245:111-121
18. Jassal DS, Shapiro MD, Neilan TG, Chaithiraphan V, Ferencik M, Teague SD, et al. 64-slice multidetector computed tomogra- phy (MDCT) for detection of aortic regurgitation and quantifica- tion of severity. Invest Radiol 2007;42:507-512
19. Goffinet C, Kersten V, Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Vancraeynest D, Pasquet A, et al. Comprehensive assessment of the severity and mechanism of aortic regurgitation using multidetector CT and MR. Eur Radiol 2010;20:326-336
20. Li X, Tang L, Zhou L, Duan Y, Yanhui S, Yang R, et al. Aortic valves stenosis and regurgitation: assessment with dual source computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:591-600
21. Feuchtner GM, Dichtl W, Müller S, Jodocy D, Schachner T, Klauser A, et al. 64-MDCT for diagnosis of aortic regurgitation in patients referred to CT coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:W1-W7
22. Feuchtner GM, Dichtl W, Schachner T, Müller S, Mallouhi A, Friedrich GJ, et al. Diagnostic performance of MDCT for detect- ing aortic valve regurgitation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:1676-1681
23. Tribouilloy CM, Enriquez-Sarano M, Fett SL, Bailey KR, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Application of the proximal flow conver- gence method to calculate the effective regurgitant orifice area in aortic regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:1032-1039
24. Zoghbi WA, Farmer KL, Soto JG, Nelson JG, Quinones MA. Accurate noninvasive quantification of stenotic aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 1986;73:452-459
25. Bartunek J, De Bacquer D, Rodrigues AC, De Bruyne B. Accuracy of aortic stenosis severity assessment by Doppler echocardiography: importance of image quality. Int J Card Imaging 1995;11:97-104
26. Danielsen R, Nordrehaug JE, Vik-Mo H. Factors affecting Doppler echocardiographic valve area assessment in aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1989;63:1107-1111
27. Ozkan M, Ozdemir N, Kaymaz C, Kirma C, Deligönül U. Measurement of aortic valve anatomic regurgitant area using transesophageal echocardiography: implications for the quanti- tation of aortic regurgitation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002;15:1170-1174
28. Masci PG, Dymarkowski S, Bogaert J. Valvular heart disease: what does cardiovascular MRI add? Eur Radiol 2008;18:197-208
29. Gelfand EV, Hughes S, Hauser TH, Yeon SB, Goepfert L, Kissinger KV, et al. Severity of mitral and aortic regurgitation as assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimizing correlation with Doppler echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2006;8:503-507
30. Kutty S, Whitehead KK, Natarajan S, Harris MA, Wernovsky G, Fogel MA. Qualitative echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve regurgitation with quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance: a comparative study. Pediatr Cardiol 2009;30:971-977