Resistance and tolerance in animal enemy-victim coevolution

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 267-274

  Svensson, Erik I ^a   Råberg, Lars ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTAGONISM; BROOD PARASITISM; COEVOLUTION; DEFENSE BEHAVIOR; MATING BEHAVIOR; PLANT DEFENSE; TERRITORIALITY; TOLERANCE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; PLANT; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATION;

ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; PLANTS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 77950617570     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Stowe K.A., et al. The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31 (2000) 565-595
2. Rausher M.D. Co-evolution and plant resistance to natural enemies. Nature 411 (2001) 857-864
3. Nunez-Farfan J., et al. The evolution of resistance and tolerance to herbivores. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38 (2007) 541-566
4. Simms E.L., and Triplett J. Costs and benefits of plant-responses to disease: resistance and tolerance. Evolution 48 (1994) 1973-1985
5. Fornoni J., et al. Population variation in the cost and benefit of tolerance and resistance against herbivory in Datura stramonium. Evolution 58 (2004) 1696-1704
6. Restif O., and Koella J.C. Shared control of epidemiological traits in a coevolutionary model of host-parasite interactions. Am. Nat. 161 (2003) 827-836
7. Restif O., and Koella J.C. Concurrent evolution of resistance and tolerance to pathogens. Am. Nat. 164 (2004) E90-E102
8. Woolhouse M.E.J., et al. Biological and biomedical implications of the co-evolution of pathogens and their hosts. Nature Genetics 32 (2002) 569-577
9. Gaba S., and Ebert D. Time-shift experiments as a tool to study antagonistic coevolution. Trends Ecol. & Evol. 24 (2009) 226-232
10. Tiffin P. Are tolerance, avoidance, and antibiosis evolutionarily and ecologically equivalent responses of plants to herbivores?. Am. Nat. 155 (2000) 128-138
11. Roy B.A., and Kirchner J.W. Evolutionary dynamics of pathogen resistance and tolerance. Evolution 54 (2000) 51-63
12. Baucom R.S., and Mauricio R. Constraints on the evolution of tolerance to herbicide in the common morning glory: resistance and tolerance are mutually exclusive. Evolution 62 (2008) 2842-2854
13. Sinervo B., and Svensson E. Correlational selection and the evolution of genomic architecture. Heredity 89 (2002) 329-338
14. Fornoni J., et al. Evolution of mixed strategies of plant defense allocation against natural enemies. Evolution 58 (2004) 1685-1695
15. Corby-Harris V., et al. Alternative measures of response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 20 (2007) 526-533
16. Råberg L., et al. Disentangling genetic variation for resistance and tolerance to infectious diseases in animals. Science 318 (2007) 812-814
17. Boots M. Fight or learn to live with the consequences?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23 (2008) 248-250
18. Schneider D.S., and Ayres J.S. Two ways to survive infection: what resistance and tolerance can teach us about treating infectious diseases. Nature Reviews Immunology 8 (2008) 889-895
19. Ayres, J.S. and Schneider, D.S. (2008) A signalling protease inn Drosophila affects resistance and tolerance of infections. Plos Biol. 6 (12), e305. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060305
20. Read, A.F et al. (2008) Animal defenses against infectious agents: is damage control more important than pathogen control. PLoS. Biol. 6 (12), e1000004. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000004
21. Seixas E., et al. Heme oxygenase-1 affords protection against noncerebral forms of severe malaria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106 (2009) 15837-15842
22. Ehrlich P.R., and Raven P.H. Butterflies and plants - a study in coevolution. Evolution 18 (1964) 586-608
23. Van Valen L. A new evolutionary law. Evol. Theory 1 (1973) 1-30
24. Brooke M.D., and Davies N.B. Egg mimicry by cuckoos Cuculus canorus in relation to discrimination by hosts. Nature 335 (1988) 630-632
25. Benkman C.W. The selection mosaic and diversifying coevolution between crossbills and lodgepole pine. Am. Nat. 153 (1999) S75-S91
26. Lively C.M., and Dybdahl M.F. Parasite adaptation to locally common host genotypes. Nature 405 (2000) 679-681
27. Brodie E.D., et al. The evolutionary response of predators to dangerous prey: Hotspots and coldspots in the geographic mosaic of coevolution between garter snakes and newts. Evolution 56 (2002) 2067-2082
28. Decaestecker E., et al. Host-parasite 'Red Queen' dynamics archived in pond sediment. Nature 450 (2007) 870-916
29. Miller M.R., et al. The evolution of parasites in response to tolerance in their hosts: The good, the bad, and apparent commensalism. Evolution 60 (2006) 945-956
30. Rice W.R. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381 (1996) 232-234
31. Rice W.R., and Holland B. The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE), and the intraspecific Red Queen. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41 (1997) 1-10
32. Arnqvist G., and Rowe L. Sexual Conflict (2005), Princeton University Press
33. Råberg L., et al. Review. Decomposing health: tolerance and resistance to parasites in animals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 364 (2009) 37-49
34. Thompson J.N. The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution (2005), University of Chicago Press
35. Tiffin P., and Rausher M.D. Genetic constraints and selection acting on tolerance to herbivory in the common morning glory Ipomoea purpurea. Am. Nat. 154 (1999) 700-716
36. Wade M.J., and Kalisz S.M. The causes of natural selection. Evolution 44 (1990) 1947-1955
37. Svensson E., and Sinervo B. Experimental excursions on adaptive landscapes: density-dependent selection on egg size. Evolution 54 (2000) 1396-1403
38. Kruger O. Cuckoos, cowbirds and hosts: adaptations, trade-offs and constraints. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B. Biol. Sci. 362 (2007) 1873-1886
39. Davies N.B., et al. Recognition errors and probability of parasitism determine whether reed warblers should accept or reject mimetic cuckoo eggs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B. Biol. Sci. 263 (1996) 925-931
40. Davies N.B., et al. Nestling cuckoos, Cuculus canorus, exploit hosts with begging calls that mimic a brood. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B. Biol. Sci. 265 (1998) 673-678
41. Soler J.J., et al. Coevolutionary interactions in a host-parasite system. Ecology Letters 4 (2001) 470-476
42. Soler M., et al. Magpie host manipulation by great spotted cuckoos: evidence for an avian mafia. Evolution 49 (1995) 770-775
43. Soler J.J., et al. Life history of magpie populations sympatric or allopatric with the brood parasitic great spotted cuckoo. Ecology 82 (2001) 1621-1631
44. Rothstein S.I. Experimental and teleonomic investigation of avian brood parasitism. The Condor 77 (1975) 250-271
45. Rothstein S.I. Evolutionary rates and host defenses against avian brood parasitism. Am. Nat. 109 (1975) 161-176
46. Brooker M., and Brooker L. Acceptance by the splendid fairy-wren of parasitism by Horsfield's bronze-cuckoo: Further evidence for evolutionary equilibrium in brood parasitism. Behav. Ecol. 7 (1996) 395-407
47. Smith J.N.M. Cowbird parasitism, host fitness, and age of the host female in an island song sparrow population. The Condor 83 (1981) 152-161
48. Arnqvist G., and Nilsson T. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim. Behav. 60 (2000) 145-164
49. Chapman T., et al. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373 (1995) 241-244
50. Stutt A.D., and Siva-Jothy M.T. Traumatic insemination and sexual conflict in the bed bug Cimex lectularius. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98 (2001) 5683-5687
51. Ronn J., et al. Coevolution between harmful male genitalia and female resistance in seed beetles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 (2007) 10921-10925
52. Gavrilets S. Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers by sexual conflict. Nature 403 (2000) 886-889
53. Gavrilets S., and Waxman D. Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99 (2002) 10533-10538
54. Gavrilets S., and Hayashi T.I. Speciation and sexual conflict. Evol. Ecol. 19 (2005) 167-198
55. Hayashi T.I., et al. Genetic differentiation by sexual conflict. Evolution 61 (2007) 516-529
56. Svensson E.I., et al. Female polymorphism, frequency dependence, and rapid evolutionary dynamics in natural populations. Am. Nat. 165 (2005) 567-576
57. Svensson E.I., et al. Female polymorphisms, sexual conflict and limits to speciation processes in animals. Evol. Ecol. 23 (2009) 93-108
58. Gowaty P.A. Reproductive compensation. J. Evol. Biol. 21 (2008) 1189-1200
59. Arnqvist G., and Rowe L. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415 (2002) 787-789
60. Lew T.A., et al. Standing genetic variance for female resistance to harm from males and its relationship to intralocus sexual conflict. Evolution 60 (2006) 97-105
61. Gosden T.P., and Svensson E.I. Density-dependent male mating harassment, female resistance, and male mimicry. Am. Nat. 173 (2009) 709-721
62. Moorcroft P.R., et al. Density-dependent selection in a fluctuating ungulate population. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B. Biol. Sci. 263 (1996) 31-38
63. Sinervo B., et al. Density cycles and an offspring quantity and quality game driven by natural selection. Nature 406 (2000) 985-988
64. Svensson E., et al. Density-dependent competition and selection on immune function in genetic lizard morphs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98 (2001) 12561-12565
65. Mueller L.D. Evolution of competitive ability in Drosophila by density-dependent natural selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85 (1988) 4383-4386
66. Borash D.J., et al. A genetic polymorphism maintained by natural selection in a temporally varying environment. Am. Nat. 151 (1998) 148-156
67. Frank S.A., and Slatkin M. Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7 (1992) 92-95
68. Both C., and Visser M.E. Breeding territory size affects fitness: an experimental study on competition at the individual level. J. Anim. Ecol. 69 (2000) 1021-1030
69. Gomulkiewicz R., et al. Dos and don'ts of testing the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution. Heredity 98 (2007) 249-258
70. Baucom R.S., and Mauricio R. The evolution of novel herbicide tolerance in a noxious weed: the geographic mosaic of selection. Evol. Ecol. 22 (2008) 85-101