Fred morrow fling and the source-method of teaching history

Theory and Research in Social Education

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 466-501

  Osborne, Ken ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950531047     PISSN: 00933104     EISSN: 21631654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2003.10473234     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Adams, N. and B.G. Smith (eds.). (2001) History and the Texture of Modern Life: Selected Essays: Lucy Maynard Salmon. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
2. American Historical Association. (1898). Annual report of the American Historical Association for the year 1898. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
3. American Historical Association. (1899). The study of history in schools: Report to the American Historical Association by the Committee of Seven. New York:Macmillan.
4. American Historical Association. (1911). The meeting of the American Historical Association at Baltimore. American Historical Review, 11, 491-514.
5. American Historical Association. (1912). Annual report of the American Historical Association for the year 1912. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
6. American Historical Association. (1927). The meeting of the American Historical Association at Rochester. American Historical Review, 33, 429-445.
7. Barnes, M.S. (1885). Studies in general history. Boston: Heath.
8. Barnes, M.S. (1886). Studies in general history: Teachers' manual. Boston: Heath.
9. Beale, H.K. (1936). Are teachers free? An analysis of restraints upon the freedom of teaching in America. Part X11, Report of the Commission on the Social Studies. New York: Scribner's.
10. Beard, C.A. (1909). The use of sources in instruction in government and politics. History Teachers Magazine, 1, 40-50.
11. Becker, C. (1910/1958). Detachment and the writing of history. The Atlantic Monthly, 106, 524-536. Reprinted in P. L. Snyder (Ed.). (1958). Detachment and the writing of history: Essays and letters of Carl L. Becker. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 3-28.
12. Bohan, C.H. (1999) Lucy Maynard Salmon: Progressive historian, teacher, and democrat. In M.S. Crocco and O.L. Davis, Jr. (Eds.), Bending the future to their will: Civic women, social education, and democracy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Litlefield, 47-72.
13. Bourne, H.E. (1921). Review of F.M. Fling, The Writing of History: An Introduction to Historical Method. American Historical Review, 26, 305-307.
14. Breisach, E.A. (1993). American progressive history: An experiment in modernization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Brown, L.F. (1943). Apostle of democracy: The life of Lucy Maynard Salmon. New York: Harper.
16. Caldwell, H.W. (1897). Studies in American history, Volume 1: A survey of American history. Lincoln, NE: J.H. Miller.
17. Caldwell, H.W. (1898). Studies in American history, Volume 11: Some American legislators: Source extracts. Lincoln, NE: J.H. Miller.
18. Carlson, R.E. (1981). Professor Fred Fling, his career and conflicts at Nebraska University. Nebraska History, 62, 481-496.
19. Carr, E.H. (1961). What is history? London: Macmillan.
20. Cripe, M. H. (1926). Lecture Notes October 6,1926-May 8,1927. Fling Papers, Box 6, Folder 5. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Archives.
21. Cripe, M, Hermanek, M. (1926-1927). Cripe, Mrs. Edward ((Marie Hermanek), lecture notes 1926-27. Fling Papers, Box 6, Folder 2. Lincoln, NE:University of Nebraska Archives.
22. Crocco, M.S. (1997). Mary Ritter Beard and Marion Thompson Wright: Shaping inclusive social education. Theory and Research in Social Education, 25, 9-33.
23. Dickinson, A, Gordon, P., and Lee, P. J. (2003) International review of history education, Volume 3: Raising standards in history education. London: Woburn Press.
24. Dudley, R.E. (1970). History and the social sciences in Nebraska public secondary schools during the quarter century of the national committee movement, 1891-1918. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Ph.D. dissertation.
25. Dudley, R.E. (1973). Nebraska public school education 1890-1910. Nebraska History, 54, 65-90.
26. Fling, F.M. & Caldwell, H.W. (1897). Studies in European and American history: An introduction to the source study method in history. Lincoln, NE: J.H. Miller.
27. Fling, F. M. (1898). Studies in European history: Grecian and Roman civilization, with an introduction to the source method. Lincoln, NE:J.H. Miller.
28. Fling, F.M. (1899a). Outline of historical method. Lincoln: J.H. Miller.
29. Fling, F.M. (1899b). The study of history in schools. North-Western Monthly, 10, pp. 459-462.
30. Fling, F.M. (1903). Historical synthesis. American Historical Review, 9, 1-22.
31. Fling, F.M. (1907). A source book of Greek history. Boston: Heath.
32. Fling, F.M. (1908a). Information versus method. University Journal, 4, 59-60.
33. Fling, F.M. (1908b). Mirabeau and the French Revolution: The youth of Mirabeau. New York: Putnam.
34. Fling, F.M. (1909/1994). One use of sources in the teaching of history. The Social Studies, 1, reprinted 85, 206-210.
35. Fling, F.M. (1912). Review of J.H. Robinson, The new history. Yale Review, 11, 166-169.
36. Fling, F.M. & Fling, H.D. (1913). Source problems on the French Revolution. New York: Harper.
37. Fling, F.M. (1919). The use of sources in history teaching during the last decade (19091919). The Historical Outlook, 10, 507-508.
38. Fling, F.M. (1920). The Writing of History. New Haven: Yale University Press.
39. Fling, F.M. (1934). Seventh international congress of historical sciences, Warsaw, August 21-28, 1933. American Historical Review, 39, 269-274.
40. Granatstein, J.L. (1998) Who killed Canadian history? Toronto: HarperCollins.
41. Grant, S.G. (2003). History lessons: Teaching, learning, and testing in U.S. high school classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Haines, D.L. (1977). Scientific history as a teaching method. Journal of American History, 63, 892-912.
43. Haskins, C.H. (1906). Report of the conference on the first year of the college work in history. Annual Report of the American Historical Association for the Year 1905. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 147-174.
44. Hazen, C.D. et al. (1902). Historical sources in schools: Report to the New England History Teachers' Association by a select committee. New York: Macmillan.
45. Herbst, J. (1965). The German historical school in American scholarship: A study in the transfer of culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
46. Hertzberg, H.W. (1981). Social studies reform 1880-1980. Boulder: Social Science Education Consortium.
47. Hertzberg, H.W. (1989). History and progressivism: A century of reform proposals. In P. Gagnon (Ed.). Historical literacy: The case for history in American Education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 69-99.
48. Hicks, J.D. (1965). My nine years at the University of Nebraska. Nebraska History, 46, 1-27.
49. Higham, J. (1989). History: Professional scholarship in America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
50. History. (1918). The effect of the war on the teaching of history. History 3, 10-24.
51. James, J.A. (1906). Report of the conference on the teaching of history in elementary schools. Annual report of the American Historical Association for the year 1905, Vol. 1. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 135-145.
52. Keatinge, M.W. (1910). Studies in the Teaching of History. London: A. & C. Black.
53. Keels, O.M. (1980). The collegiate influence on the early social studies curriculum: A reassessment of the role of historians. Theory and Research in Social Education, 8, 105-120.
54. Keels, O.M. (1988-1989). Herbert Baxter Adams and the influence of the American Historical Association on the early social studies. International Journal of Social Education, 3, 37-49.
55. Keohane, R.E. (1948). Mary Sheldon Barnes and the origin of the source method of teaching history in the American secondary school. American Heritage, 2, 68-72 & 109-112.
56. Keohane, R. E. (1949). The great debate over the source method. Social Education, 13, 212-218.
57. Krey, A.C. (1915). Bulletin for teachers of history. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Current Problems No. 7.
58. Lincoln Star. (1934). “Dr. Fred Fling, noted historian of Nebraska University, is dead." Lincoln Star, 9 June, 3.
59. Link, A.S. (Ed.). (1970). The papers of Woodrow Wilson, Vol. 8, 1892-1894. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
60. MacIntyre, S. & Clark, A. (2003). The History Wars. Melbourne: University of Melbourne Press.
61. Manley, R.N. (1969). Centennial history of the University of Nebraska, Volume 1. Frontier University (1869-1919). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
62. Martineau, R. (1999). L'histoire a l'ecole: Matiere a penser. Montreal: L'Harmattan.
63. McAninch, S.A. (1990). The educational theory of Mary Sheldon Barnes; Inquiry learning as indoctrination in history education. Educational Theory, 40, 45-52.
64. Monteverde, F.E. (1999). Considering the source: Mary Sheldon Barnes. In M.S. Crocco and O.L. Davis, Jr. (eds.), Bending the future to their will: Civic women, social education, and democracy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 17-46.
65. Nash, G.B., Crabtree, C., and Dunn, R.E. (1997). History on trial: Culture wars and the teaching of the past. New York: Knopf.
66. Nelson, M.R. (1996). Lucy Maynard Salmon (1853-1927): Pioneering views on teaching history. The Social Studies, 87, 7-12.
67. Novick, P. (1988). That noble dream: The "objectivity question" and the American historical profession. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
68. Ogg, F.A. (1907). A source book of mediaeval history. New York: American Book Company.
69. Osborne, K. (2000). ‘Our history syllabus has us gasping': History in Canadian schools - past, present, and future. Canadian Historical Review, 81 (3), 404-435.
70. Osborne, K. (2003). Teaching history in schools: A Canadian debate. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35, 585-626
71. Pierce, B.L. (1926). Public opinion and the teaching of history in the United States. New York: Knopf.
72. Phillips, R. (1998). History teaching, nationhood and the state: A study in educational politics. London: Cassell.
73. Pollak, O.B. (1999). Fred Morrow Fling on historical methodology: A one-hundred-year retrospective. Nebraska History, 80. 166-168.
74. Robinson, J.H. (1894). Ought the sources to be used in teaching history? Association of Colleges and Preparatory Schools of the Middle States and Maryland, Proceedings, 38-44.
75. Robinson, J.H. (1904). Readings in European History, Volume 1. Boston: Ginn, 1-13.
76. Robinson, J.H. (1912). The New History. New York: Macmillan.
77. Salmon, L.M. (1902). Some principles in the teaching of history. In C.A. McMurry (Ed.). The first yearbook of the National Society for the Scientific Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 11-61.
78. Saxe, D.W. (1989). Mary Sheldon Barnes and the introduction of social sciences in public schools. The Social Studies, 80, 199-202.
79. Saxe, D.W. (1991). Social studies in schools: A history of the early years. Albany: State University of New York Press.
80. Saxe, D.W. (1994). Establishing a voice for history in schools: The first methods textbooks for history instruction 1896-1902. Theory and Research in Social Education, 22, 482-514.
81. Schmitt, B. (1960). The fashion and future of history: Historical studies and addresses. Cleveland, OH: Press of Western Reserve University.
82. Smith, C.W. (1973). Carl Becker: On history and the climate of opinion. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
83. Smith, M.P. (1925-1926) Lecture notes from Fling's/Pfeiffer's classes. Fling papers, Box 6, Folder 13. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Archives.
84. Soderbergh, P. A. (1965). Charles A. Beard and the public schools, 1909-1939. History of Education Quarterly, 5, 241-252.
85. Stearns, P. N., Seixas, P, and Wineburg, S. (Eds.). (2000). Knowing, teaching and learning history: National and international perspectives. New York: New York University Press.
86. Symcox, L. (2002). Whose history? The struggle for national standards in American classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
87. Van Sledright, B. (2002). In search of America's past: Learning to read history in elementary school. New York: Teachers College Press.
88. Waggener, Miss. 1919. Lecture notes from Miss Waggener's rewritten notes, Oct.-Nov 1919-May n.d. Fling papers, Box 6, Folder 5. University of Nebraska Archives.
89. Whelan, M. (1991). James Harvey Robinson, the new history, and the 1916 social studies report. The History Teacher, 24, 191-202.
90. Whelan, M. (1994). Albert Bushnell Hart and the origins of social studies education. Theory and Research in Social Education, 22, 423-440.
91. Whelan, M. (1997). Social studies for social reform: Charles Beard's vision of history and social studies education. Theory and Research in Social Education, 25, 288-315.
92. Wentworth, C. (1964). The development of the social studies in the Omaha public schools. Lincoln: University of Nebraska, Ed. D. Dissertation.
93. Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.