Randomized comparison between 3 surface treatments of a single anteverted stem design. 84 hips followed for 5 Years.

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Thien, Truike M ^a   Thanner, Jonas ^a   Kärrholm, Johan ^a  

^a SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bone mineral density; Cemented; Femoral component; Hip arthroplasty; Primary; Radiostereometry; Surface treatment

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM; COBALT; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; PELVIS RADIOGRAPHY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; WEIGHT BEARING;

EID: 77950521503     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.01.015     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Nivbrant B., Kärrholm J., Soderlund P. Increased migration of the SHP prosthesis: radiostereometric comparison with the Lubinus SP2 design in 40 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1999, 70:569.
2. Kärrholm J., Borssen B., Lowenhielm G., et al. Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994, 76:912.
3. Huiskes R., Verdonschot N., Nivbrant B. Migration, stem shape, and surface finish in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 355:103.
4. Rockborn P., Olsson S.S. Loosening and bone resorption in Exeter hip arthroplasties. Review at a minimum of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993, 75:865.
5. Middleton R.G., Howie D.W., Costi K., et al. Effects of design changes on cemented tapered femoral stem fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 355:47.
6. Mohler C.G., Callaghan J.J., Collis D.K., et al. Early loosening of the femoral component at the cement-prosthesis interface after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995, 77:1315.
7. Alfaro-Adrian J., Gill H.S., Murray D.W. Cement migration after THR. A comparison of Charnley Elite and Exeter femoral stems using RSA. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999, 81:130.
8. Alfaro-Adrian J., Gill H.S., Murray D.W. Should total hip arthroplasty femoral components be designed to subside? A radiostereometric analysis study of the Charnley Elite and Exeter stems. J Arthroplasty 2001, 16:598.
9. Rasquinha V.J., Ranawat C.S., Dua V., et al. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study of smooth versus rough stems using cement fixation: minimum 5-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19(7 Suppl 2):2.
10. Della Valle A.G., Zoppi A., Peterson M.G., et al. A rough surface finish adversely affects the survivorship of a cemented femoral stem. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 436:158.
11. Harris W.H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty: an end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969, 51:737.
12. Huskinsson EC Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974, 2:1127.
13. Selvik G. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1989, 232:1.
14. Kärrholm J. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Review of orthopedic applications. Acta Orthop Scand 1989, 60:491. [Review].
15. Kärrholm J., Herberts P., Hultmark P., et al. Radiostereometry of hip prostheses. Review of methodology and clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997, 344:94.
16. Gruen T.A., McNeice G.M., Amstutz H.C. Modes of failure of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979, 141:17.
17. Barrack L.R., Mulroy R.D., Harris W.H. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1992, 74:385.
18. Hultmark P., Hostner J., Herberts P., et al. Radiographic evaluation of Charnley cups used in first-time revision: repeated observations for 7-15 years. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18:1005.
19. Brooker A.F., Bowerman J.W., Robinson R.A., et al. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg 1973, 55:1629.
20. Delee J.G., Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976, 121:20.
21. O'Connor D.O., Burke D.W., Jasty M., et al. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing. J Orthop Res 1996, 14:769.
22. Collis D.K., Mohler C.G. Comparison of clinical outcomes in total hip arthroplasty using rough and polished cemented stems with essentially the same geometry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84-A:586.
23. Fowler J.L., Gie G.A., Lee A.J., et al. Experience with the Exeter total hip replacement since 1970. Orthop Clin North Am 1988, 19:477.
24. Nivbrant B. The femoral component in total hip arthroplasty: an evaluation of stem design, fixation principles and loosening scenario. Thesis Umeå, Sweden 1999.
25. Stefansdottir A., Franzen H., Johnsson R., et al. Movement pattern of the Exeter femoral stem; a radiostereometric analysis of 22 primary hip arthroplasties followed for 5 years. Acta Orthop Scand 2004, 75:408.
26. Nivbrant B., Kärrholm J., Rohrl S., et al. Bone cement with reduced proportion of monomer in total hip arthroplasty: preclinical evaluation and randomized study of 47 cases with 5 years' follow-up. Acta Orthop Scand 2001, 72:572.
27. Thanner J., Freij-Larsson C., Kärrholm J., et al. Evaluation of Boneloc. Chemical and mechanical properties, and a randomized clinical study of 30 total hip arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 1995, 66:207.
28. Digas G., Kärrholm J., Thanner J. Addition of fluoride to acrylic bone cement does not improve fixation of a total hip arthroplasty stem. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 448:58.
29. Muller S.D., Green S.M., McCaskie A.W. The dynamic volume changes of polymerising polymethyl methacrylate bone cement. Acta Orthop Scand 2002, 73:684.
30. Verdonschot N., Huiskes R. Acrylic cement creeps but does not allow much subsidence of femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997, 79-B:665.
31. Jasty M., Maloney W.J., Bragdon C.R., et al. The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991, 73:551.
32. Barker D.S., Wang A.W., Yeo M.F., et al. The skeletal response to matt and polished cemented femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000, 82:1182.
33. Lennon A.B., McCormack B.A., Prendergast P.J. The relationship between cement fatigue damage and implant surface finish in proximal femoral prostheses. Med Eng Phys 2003, 25:833.
34. Ebramzadeh E., Sangiorgio S.N., Longjohn D.B., et al. Initial stability of cemented femoral stems as a function of surface finish, collar, and stem size. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A:106.
35. Howie D.W., Middleton R.G., Costi K. Loosening of matt and polished cemented femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998, 80:573.
36. Collis D.K., Mohler C.G. Loosening rates and bone lysis with rough finished and polished stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 255:113.
37. Kärrholm J., Herberts P. Annual report 2006 Swedish total hip arthroplasty register. Augustus 2007.
38. Catani F., Ensini A., Leardini A., et al. Migration of cemented stem and restrictor after total hip arthroplasty: a radiostereometry study of 25 patients with Lubinus SP II stem. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:244.
39. Oosterbos J.M., Rahmy A.I.A., Tonino A.J., et al. High survival rate of hydroxyapatite-coated hip prostheses. 100 consecutive hips followed for 10 years. Acta Orthop Scand 2004, 75:127.
40. Saito J., Aslam N., Tokunaga K., et al. Bone remodeling is different in metaphyseal and diaphyseal-fit uncemented hip stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 451:128.