A prospective, randomized, double-blind study of smooth versus rough stems using cement fixation: Minimum 5-year follow-up

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 19, Issue 7 SUPPL., 2004, Pages 2-9

  Rasquinha, Vijay J ^a   Ranawat, Chitranjan S ^a,b   Dua, Vipul ^a   Ranawat, Amar S ^a   Rodriguez, Jose A ^a  

^a LENOX HILL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Ranawat Orthopaedic Center   (United States)

Author keywords

cemented; femoral; stem; surface roughness; third generation

Indexed keywords

CEFAZOLIN; CEMENT; WARFARIN;

ADULT; AGED; ASEPSIS; BONE NECROSIS; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COXITIS; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DEVICE INFECTION; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DYSPLASIA; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; LOW DRUG DOSE; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OSTEOLYSIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; THROMBOEMBOLISM;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CEMENTATION; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 5344244739     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.06.005     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Charnley J. Operative technique of low friction arthroplasty of the hip joint. 1967;Internal Publication, Centre for Hip Surgery, Wrightington, England. 6:1
2. Herberts P., Malchau H. How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden. Clin Orthop. 344:1997;44
3. Crowninshield R.D., Jennings J.D., Laurent M.I., et al. Cemented femoral component surface finish mechanics. Clin Orthop. 355:1998;90
4. Ling R.S.M. The use of a collar and precoating on cemented femoral stems is unnecessary and detrimental. Clin Orthop. 285:1992;73
5. Gruen T. A simple assessment of bone quality prior to hip arthroplasty cortical index revisited. Acta Orthop Belg. 63:(Suppl 1):1997;20
6. Wilson P.D. Jr, Amstutz H.C., Czerniecki A., et al. Total hip replacement with fixation by acrylic cement a preliminary study of 100 consecutive McKee-Farrar prosthetic replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 54:1972;207
7. DeLee J.G., Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop. 121:1976;20
8. Martell J.M., Pierson R.H. III, Jacobs J.J., et al. Primary total hip reconstruction with a titanium fiber-coated prosthesis inserted without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 75:1993;554
9. Ranawat C.S., Deshmukh R.G., Peters L.E., Umlas M.E. Prediction of the long-term durability of all-polyethylene cemented sockets. Clin Orthop. 317:1995;89
10. Barrack R.L., Mulroy R.D. Jr, Harris W.H. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty a 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 74:1992;385
11. Brooker A.F., Bowerman J.W., Robinson R.A., Riley L.H. Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 55:1973;1629
12. Kaplan E.L., Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Statist Assoc. 53:1958;457
13. Middleton R.G., Howie D.W., Costi K., Sharpe P. Effects of design changes on cemented tapered femoral stem fixation. Clin Orthop. 355:1998;47
14. Williams H.D.W., Browne G., Gie G.A., et al. The Exeter universal cemented femoral component at 8 to 12 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 84:2002;324
15. Fowler J.L., Gie G.A., Lee A.J., Ling R.S. Experience with the Exeter total knee replacement since 1970. Orthop Clin North Am. 19:1988;477
16. Rockborn P., Olsson S.S. Loosening and bone resorption in Exeter hip arthroplasties review at a minimum of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 75:1993;865
17. Collis D.K. The value of maintaining outcomes in an individual practice for 25 years. Clin Orthop. 344:1997;69
18. Dall D.M., Learmonth I.D., Solomon M.I., et al. Fracture and loosening of Charnley femoral stems comparison between first-generation and subsequent designs. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 75:1993;259
19. Kavanagh B.F., Wallrichs S., Dewitz M., et al. Charnley low-friction arthroplasty of the hip twenty-year results with cement. J Arthroplasty. 9:1994;229
20. Schulte K.R., Callaghan J.J., Kelley S.S., Johnston R.C. The outcome of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement after a minimum twenty-year follow-up the results of one surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 75:1993;961
21. Callaghan J.J., Forest E.E., Sporer S.M., et al. Total hip arthroplasty in the young adult. Clin Orthop. 344:1997;257
22. Harris W.H. Hybrid total hip replacement rationale and intermediate clinical results. Clin Orthop. 333:1996;155
23. Mulroy W.F., Estok D.M., Harris W.H. Total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques a fifteen-year average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 77:1995;1845
24. Maloney W.J., Schmalzried T., Harris W.H. Analysis of long-term cemented total hip arthroplasty retrievals. Clin Orthop. 405:2002;70
25. Malchau H., Herberts P. Prognosis of total hip replacement: revision and re-revision rate in THR: a revision-risk study of 148,359 primary operations. 1998;Proceedings of the 65th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, New Orleans, LA
26. Malchau H., Herberts P., Garellick G., et al. Prognosis of total hip replacement update of results and risk-ratio analysis for revision and re-revision from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register 1979-2000. 2002;Proceedings of the 69th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Dallas, TX